JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Gk2829 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Carno (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Pardon
Pardon


<p><unclear>Thus</unclear> either the circumstances specified is not in being <gap/> incapable therefore of being <gap/> <lb/>
<p><unclear>Thus</unclear> either the circumstances specified is not in being <gap/> incapable therefore of being <gap/><lb/> the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal<lb/> evidence. [under <add>limitations of legal rules</add> legal limitations.]</p>  


the subject of a Trial, or is of too <gap/> a <gap/> to be collected from legal<lb/>
<p>The check therefore here <unclear>imposed</unclear> is the only check <unclear>competent</unclear> to the subject, the<lb/> same as that upon Juries the sense of shame - to which may be added, impeachment<lb/>
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case <del>which</del> <add>as it ca</add><lb/> of <unclear>the</unclear> suggestion containing a very <unclear>obvious</unclear> falsehood -<lb/></p>


evidence. [under <add>limitations of legal rules </add> legal limitations.]</p>  
<p>In the instance of particular <gap/> [to be specified by the law] for which, (should<lb/>
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments in <unclear>hor</unclear><lb/> as it is called, without design of universal execution - as <del>in</del> under the Laws<lb/> against Papists these specifications may be dispensed with</p>


<p>The check therefore here <unclear>imposed</unclear> is the only check <gap/> to the subject, the <lb/>
<note><gap/>? should he name of the person applying for the <gap/> be specified in the <gap/> would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
<gap/> too whether any <unclear>distinction</unclear> this law between <gap/></note><pb/>


same as that upon <gap/> the sense of shame - to which may be added, <unclear>impeachment</unclear><lb/>


of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case <del><gap/></del><lb/>


of the <unclear> suggestion containing </unclear> a very <unclear> obvious </unclear> falsehood -<lb/></p>
<p>In the instance of particular <gap/> [to be specified by the law]<lb/>
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments in <gap/> <lb/>
as it is called, without <unclear> design </unclear> of universal execution - as <del><gap/></del> under the Laws<lb/>
against?? Papists?? there specifications may be dispensed with<lb/></p>
??? whould he name of the person applying for the ???
be specified in the ????? wants or want not this be
l???ing too great a ???? or pardons of the man where
???? against himself to p??? one
Less too whether any ???????
??? this law between ?????
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 22:46, 22 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

Pardon

Thus either the circumstances specified is not in being incapable therefore of being
the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal
evidence. [under limitations of legal rules legal limitations.]

The check therefore here imposed is the only check competent to the subject, the
same as that upon Juries the sense of shame - to which may be added, impeachment
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case which as it ca
of the suggestion containing a very obvious falsehood -

In the instance of particular [to be specified by the law] for which, (should
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments in hor
as it is called, without design of universal execution - as in under the Laws
against Papists these specifications may be dispensed with

? should he name of the person applying for the be specified in the would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture was forced to himself to procure one too whether any distinction this law between
---page break---





Identifier: | JB/050/145/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16136

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in