JB/095/115/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/115/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
<head><del>The</del> Nugatory<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi>  Preamble<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
<head><del>The</del> Nugatory<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi>  Preamble<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
<p><del>This Statute to</del> <note>Where <hi rend='underline'>something</hi> is to be said, the ways of saying it may come under tolerable cal-culation.  But the ways of saying nothing at all are infinite. </note> It may not be easy to discover &amp; to class every<lb/>distinguishable species of <hi rend='underline'>nugation</hi>: this Statute<lb/> will furnish us with 2.<lb/></p><p>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief<lb/>meant to be prevented.<lb/></p>2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Recital in <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> <add>terms of the existence</add> that a certain practice <lb/>is inconvenient &#x2014; suspended <add>or both</add>  
<p><del>This Statute to</del> <note>Where <hi rend='underline'>something</hi> is to be said, the ways of saying it may come under tolerable cal-culation.  But the ways of saying nothing at all are infinite. </note> It may not be easy to discover &amp; to class every<lb/>distinguishable species of <hi rend='underline'>nugation</hi>: this Statute<lb/> will furnish us with 2.<lb/></p><p>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief<lb/>meant to be prevented.<lb/></p>2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Recital in <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> <add>terms of the existence</add> that a certain practice <lb/>is inconvenient &#x2014; suspended <add>or both</add>  
by the very act<add> the possibility of an act <add>event</add> <add> and its imagined mischief <add>inconvenience</add> </add> <lb/>of prohibition.  <note>Or thus  - 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital that a franchise <lb/>meant to be prevented is mischievous. 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> Recital that it is possible.</note><lb/>
by the very act<add> the possibility of an act <add>event</add> <add> and its imagined mischief <add>inconvenience</add> <lb/>of prohibition.  <note>Or thus  - 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital that a practice <lb/>meant to be prevented is mischievous. 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> Recital that it is possible.</note><lb/>
<head>§ 23</head>
<head>§ 23</head>
<p>I cannot very well understand <del>a</del> <del><add>the</add></del> reason <add>there is to be an example</add> why Noblemen's<lb/>& Gentlemen's carriages are to be exempted from<lb/> all these regulations <note>because he <del>has</del> is a Gentleman</note> by being "covered" when <add>there is none for</add> such<lb/> as are open are not exempted.</p>
<p>I cannot very well understand <del>a</del> <del><add>the</add></del> reason <add>there is to be an example</add> why Noblemen's<lb/> &amp; Gentlemen's carriages are to be exempted from<lb/> all these regulations <note>because he <del>has</del> is a Gentleman</note> by being "<hi rend='underline'>covered</hi>" when <add>there is none for</add> such<lb/> as are open. <del>are not exempted</del>.<lb/></p>
<p>Nor why upon the <add>this</add> condition of covering his carriage<lb/><del>a man</del> is to <del> be <sic>allow'd</sic></del> <add>bear up</add> the Load, with any weight<lb/>drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.<lb/></p>
<p>Nor why <add>a man</add> upon the <add>this</add> condition of covering his carriage<lb/><del>a man</del> is to <del>be <sic>allow'd</sic></del> <add>bear up</add> the Load, with any weight<lb/>drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.<lb/></p>
<p>But if he assumes those insignia of a Gentleman<lb/><sic>uncover'd</sic> carriage <add>how can it be that .. is a </add>what Exempted man is to <lb/>suppose take upon him to suppose <add>presume</add> from that what is in the mode of it is not<lb/> for the owner's own use</p><pb/>
<p>But if he assumes these insigniae of a Gentleman<lb/>a <sic>cover'd</sic> carriage <add><del>how can it be thoug</del> whatever is a </add>which <del>is to</del> Exempted man is to <lb/>suppose take upon him to suppose <add>presume</add> from that what is in the inside of it is not<lb/> for the owner's own use<lb/></p><pb/>
<p><add>contemplating it all along</add> according to the plan adopted <add>traced out</add> here and there<lb/>in different parts of the instrument. <add>Statute</add> <del>examples</del><lb/> In this view <del>I have</del> care has been taken not to insert any <!-- blank space underlined with dashes --> for which a  precedent<lb/> is not to be met with<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> in some part of it or other<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi><!-- the superscript 2 is bracketed to the phrase "is not to be met with", and the superscript 1 is bracketed to the phrase "in some part of it or other--></p>
<p><add>contemplating it all along</add> according to the plan adopted <add>traced out</add> here and there<lb/>in different parts of the instrument. <add>Statute</add> <del>examples</del><lb/> In this view <del>I have</del> care has been taken not to insert any <!-- blank space underlined with dashes --> for which a  precedent<lb/> is not to be met with<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> in some part of it or other<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi><!-- the superscript 2 is bracketed to the phrase "is not to be met with", and the superscript 1 is bracketed to the phrase "in some part of it or other--></p>
<pb/>
<pb/>

Revision as of 22:53, 23 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet ObservationsXXIV

Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect
obedience they will take up with that
promise no more than to procure produce a partial one
but such a partial one, as the event often shews
to be insufficient to answer the purposes of the Law.

Whereas, as Mechanics in calculating the
effect of their Machines, always make [considerableoffer their utmost industry
employ'd in mitigating the effects of allowance abatement on the account of Inertia & others
to which their work is liable, yet fail not to make
a considerable deduction abatement on these accounts, so
ought Legislators in calculating the force of their
engines to be persuaded, to lay their account that many more obstacles
will spring up to their execution than what they
can foresee, much more all they do foresee.

§ 6.

Ahab hath served Baal a little: but Jehu
shall serve him much —

The following Sections of the original prepared in with the interpolations
that manner that the ones here inserted may serve as a commentary
on this text.

As a proof that so much more than enough becomes
less I have here inserted all along the additions
necessary to make it consistent with itself.


---page break---

The Nugatory2 Preamble1

This Statute to Where something is to be said, the ways of saying it may come under tolerable cal-culation. But the ways of saying nothing at all are infinite. It may not be easy to discover & to class every
distinguishable species of nugation: this Statute
will furnish us with 2.

1st Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief
meant to be prevented.

2d Recital in general terms of the existence that a certain practice
is inconvenient — suspended or both

by the very act the possibility of an act <add>event and its imagined mischief <add>inconvenience
of prohibition. Or thus - 1st Recital that a practice
meant to be prevented is mischievous. 2nd Recital that it is possible.

§ 23

I cannot very well understand a the reason there is to be an example why Noblemen's
& Gentlemen's carriages are to be exempted from
all these regulations because he has is a Gentleman by being "covered" when there is none for such
as are open. are not exempted.

Nor why a man upon the this condition of covering his carriage
a man is to be allow'd bear up the Load, with any weight
drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.

But if he assumes these insigniae of a Gentleman
a cover'd carriage how can it be thoug whatever is a which is to Exempted man is to
suppose take upon him to suppose presume from that what is in the inside of it is not
for the owner's own use


---page break---

contemplating it all along according to the plan adopted traced out here and there
in different parts of the instrument. Statute examples
In this view I have care has been taken not to insert any for which a precedent
is not to be met with2 in some part of it or other1


---page break---
CARRIERS

Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning the
respective denominations of carriages to which the
several parts Articles of this division respectively relate
It might have been a still further would have contributed still to
to have broken it into subdivisions corresponent
to these denominations — The Law concerning the owners of of private
carriages would thus have bedeleted text made one Section: that
concerning carriages used only in Husbandry another a 2d
That concerning Public Carriages in general a 3d.


---page break---

And here [it is]we we may feel at once see the advantages of a synoptic
representation: whereby & of a compacted stile,
without which indeed the framer scarely could
have place.


---page break---

By the 1st the multitude of particular propositions
of which a more general proposition is in
some way or other predicated, are together
with it, that general proposition brought under the eye at once:
By means of the 2d, the eye is enabled to fastens in the instant fastens on the object in the instant
on that which it is in quest of, no longer
doomed to the hideous dread? labours of picking out
one by one the significant the words significant, from the
insignificant.

An expedient, by virtue force of which whereby, the toil of legislation might
be reduced, as I much mistake, to a degree
not easily to be conceived.


---page break---
§ 6c

It certainly is not every Aactprovision</add<add>>purpose effect of a repealed Statute repealed
that is by the repealing Statute: all acts transacted
under it remain ...: with respect to them
it is considered as having spent itself & having
had its force.

Suppose a temporary Act to repeal another
Act: would the latter be considered as revived
by the expiration of the former?


---page break---











Identifier: | JB/095/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

observations xxiv

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in