JB/141/134/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/134/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/134/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/134/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
B.6.<lb/>
d.4. <head>Section Defeasance of punishment</head>
<head>Punishment <add><del>whether defeasible</del></add> <del><gap/> <gap/></del> by Death of Parties</head>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
In pursuit of (the means of making<add><del>giving</del></add>] Compensation, <lb/>
the business of Punishment is apt to be overlooked.<lb/>
When one man <add>the party injured</add> is presented with what<lb/>
another man the <del>delinquent</del><add>injurer</add> is made to pay, men<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> are apt to take it for granted, and <del>if asked</del> <add>at first</add><lb/>
<add>asking</add> would be apt to answer that there is no punishment<lb/>
in the case.  The imagine, but hastily and <add><del>Their notion is but it is a hasty</del></add><lb/>
<add>and erroneous [notion] one</add> erroneously, that the only person who has <del><gap/></del> suffer'd<lb/>
by the offence is that party who is the immediate<lb/>
object of the injury. If then (<del>he</del><add>[+]</add>) be made to enjoy] <note><add>[+]</add> that person by an operation of Law</note><lb/>
conclude (and justly enough were the foundation true)<lb/>
that every thing is set to rights, and that the Law<lb/>
has nothing more to do.





Revision as of 10:29, 8 November 2015

Click Here To Edit B.6.
d.4. Section Defeasance of punishment Punishment whether defeasible by Death of Parties

In pursuit of (the means of makinggiving] Compensation,
the business of Punishment is apt to be overlooked.
When one man the party injured is presented with what
another man the delinquentinjurer is made to pay, men
are apt to take it for granted, and if asked at first
asking would be apt to answer that there is no punishment
in the case. The imagine, but hastily and Their notion is but it is a hasty
and erroneous [notion] one erroneously, that the only person who has suffer'd
by the offence is that party who is the immediate
object of the injury. If then (he[+]) be made to enjoy] [+] that person by an operation of Law
conclude (and justly enough were the foundation true)
that every thing is set to rights, and that the Law
has nothing more to do.




Identifier: | JB/141/134/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

134

Info in main headings field

b. 6 ch. 4 section 3 defeazance of punishment punishment - whether defeasible by death

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48351

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in