JB/141/134/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/134/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/134/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/134/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
2<lb/>
B.6<lb/>
Ch.4<lb/>
Sec 3<lb/>
<head>Punishment - whether defeasible by Death</head>
<p>in that of compensation, that <del><gap/></del> a Law which<add><del>by</del></add> appoints<lb/>
the latter is not understood to <del><hi rend="underline">punish</hi></del><add>appoint the former</add> <del>it</del> is not<lb/>
looked upon as a <hi rend="underline">penal</hi> Law.</p>
<p>Punish however it must, a penal Law in<lb/>
<note>yet compensation without punishment is an inadequate remedy</note> one <add><del>the</del> sense of the word, it must</add> <del><gap/> <gap/></del>, if it <del>has</del> is to have any <lb/>
effect at all in preventing the the practise which is<lb/>
productive of the mischief it means to cure. And<lb/>
it is by <hi rend="underline">punishing</hi> that it does more good than<lb/>
by <hi rend="underline">indemnifying</hi>. For of the two ends prevention  <lb/>
and <del>indemnification</del><add>compensation</add>, the former, <del>as<add><gap/>added text</add></del> has been been proved,<lb/>
is <del>beyond comparison
</del><add>by much</add> the most important.</p>
This neglect however of the principal end of Law<lb/>
<note>The purpose of punishment <add>is however in</add> <del>has frequently</del> many instances <del><gap/></del> answered without design.</note> made <add>in restraint of</add> <del>against</del> private injuries has not been attended<lb/>
with all the ill consequences that might at<lb/>
first sight be imagined.


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 17:01, 9 November 2015

Click Here To Edit 2
B.6
Ch.4
Sec 3

Punishment - whether defeasible by Death

in that of compensation, that a Law whichby appoints
the latter is not understood to punishappoint the former it is not
looked upon as a penal Law.

Punish however it must, a penal Law in
yet compensation without punishment is an inadequate remedy one the sense of the word, it must , if it has is to have any
effect at all in preventing the the practise which is
productive of the mischief it means to cure. And
it is by punishing that it does more good than
by indemnifying. For of the two ends prevention
and indemnificationcompensation, the former, asadded text has been been proved,
is beyond comparison by much the most important.

This neglect however of the principal end of Law
The purpose of punishment is however in has frequently many instances answered without design. made in restraint of against private injuries has not been attended
with all the ill consequences that might at
first sight be imagined.




Identifier: | JB/141/134/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

134

Info in main headings field

b. 6 ch. 4 section 3 defeazance of punishment punishment - whether defeasible by death

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48351

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in