JB/070/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/012/001: Difference between revisions

Carno (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>Foundation of the Right of Occupancy.<lb/> A man finds a thing: he conceives<lb/> that it will afford him pleasure: that<lb/> it may be <add>of</add> use to him: he occupies it,<lb/> <add>he possesses himself of it</add> and by such his occupancy, <add>his possession</add> gains a<lb/> pleasure of <del>Expectation</del> Possession: that<lb/> is a Pleasure of <del>Possession</del> Expectation.<lb/> Now this <del>is not</del> pleasure of his is a pleasure<lb/> not bought at the <sic>expence</sic> <add>any other persons</add> of any<lb/> other <add>person!!</add>: <note>!!if no body longed for it at the same time</note> it is therefore <hi rend='underline'>pure</hi>:+ <note>+v. axiom 29. BR. III.</note> and as such<lb/> makes a clear accession to the++ <note>++common stock of happiness.</note> stock of happiness<lb/> to the community.</p>
<p>Foundation of the Right of Occupancy.
<p>It is bought at the expense of man's<lb/>pleasure: for it any other man (ha<del>d</del>ving like<lb/> opportunity) had conceived that it would give<lb/> him pleasure <add><del>such <gap/></del></add> <hi rend='underline'>he</hi>would have occupied it.++ <note>++v. axiom 30. BR. III</note><lb/> but he did <hi rend='underline'>not</hi>, by the supposition.</p>
<lb/>  
<p>There is therefore a reason for the occupant's<lb/> <del>having</del> <add><del><gap/></del></add> i:e: keeping the thing occupied.<lb/> let us see what reason there is against<lb/> any other man's having it, unless it be<lb/> by his consent.</p>
A man finds a thing: he conceives
N.B. Place Prescription on the same foundations<lb/>
<lb/>  
<head>INTROD. Occupancy foundation of the Right. II BR</head><pb/>
that it will afford him pleasure: that
<lb/>  
it may be <add>of</add> use to him: he occupies it,
<lb/>  
<add>he possesses himself of it</add> and by such his occupancy, <add>his possession</add> gains a
<lb/>  
pleasure of <del>Expectation</del> Possession: that
<lb/>  
is a Pleasure of <del>Possession</del> Expectation.
<lb/>  
Now this <del>is not</del> pleasure of his is a pleasure
<lb/>  
not bought at the <sic>expence</sic> <add>any other persons</add> of any
<lb/>  
other <add>person<hi rend='superscript'>||</hi></add>: <note><hi rend='superscript'>||</hi>if no body longed for it at the same time</note> it is therefore <hi rend='underline'>pure</hi>:<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> v. axiom 29. BR. III.</note> and as such
<lb/>  
makes a clear accession to the<hi rend='superscript'>#</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>#</hi>common stock of happiness.</note> stock of happiness
<lb/>  
to the community.</p>
 
<p>It is not bought at the <sic>expence</sic> of man's
<lb/>
pleasure: for it any other man (ha<del>d</del>ving like
<lb/>
opportunity) had conceived that it would give
<lb/>  
him pleasure <add><del>such <gap/></del></add> <hi rend='underline'>he</hi>would have occupied it.<hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> v. axiom 30. BR. III</note>
 
<pb/>
 
but he did <hi rend='underline'>not</hi>, by the supposition.</p>
 
<p>There is therefore a reason for the occupant's
<lb/>  
<del>having</del> <add><del>had</del></add> i:e: keeping the thing occupied.
<lb/>  
let us see what reason there is against
<lb/>  
any other man's having it, unless it be
<lb/>  
by his consent.</p>
 
<p>N.B. Place Prescription on the same foundations</p>
 
 
<head>INTROD. Occupancy foundation of the Right. II BR</head>





Revision as of 09:04, 28 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

Foundation of the Right of Occupancy.
A man finds a thing: he conceives
that it will afford him pleasure: that
it may be of use to him: he occupies it,
he possesses himself of it and by such his occupancy, his possession gains a
pleasure of Expectation Possession: that
is a Pleasure of Possession Expectation.
Now this is not pleasure of his is a pleasure
not bought at the expence any other persons of any
other person||: ||if no body longed for it at the same time it is therefore pure:+ + v. axiom 29. BR. III. and as such
makes a clear accession to the# #common stock of happiness. stock of happiness
to the community.

It is not bought at the expence of man's
pleasure: for it any other man (hadving like
opportunity) had conceived that it would give
him pleasure such hewould have occupied it.++ ++ v. axiom 30. BR. III
---page break---
but he did not, by the supposition.

There is therefore a reason for the occupant's
having had i:e: keeping the thing occupied.
let us see what reason there is against
any other man's having it, unless it be
by his consent.

N.B. Place Prescription on the same foundations


INTROD. Occupancy foundation of the Right. II BR






Identifier: | JB/070/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

introd. occupancy foundation of the right

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23127

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in