JB/141/137/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/137/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>Punishment <foreign>in alienam perforam</foreign><lb/>
<p>Punishment <foreign>in alienam personam</foreign>
<note>Ins:<hi rend="superscript">a</hi><lb/>
Collective punishment<lb/>
Corporations
</note>
of those who form the governing part of it. The<lb/>
of those who form the governing part of it. The<lb/>
power however of adjudging such a forfeiture<lb/>
power however of adjudging such a forfeiture<lb/>
has been very rarely <del>used</del><add>exercised</add>: and the insidious &amp;<lb/>
has been very rarely <del>used</del> <add>exercised</add>: and the insidious &amp;<lb/>
unconstitutional use that was attempted to be made<lb/>
unconstitutional use that was attempted to be made<lb/>
of it in [<add>from the reign of Charles 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></add><del>the case of the City of London]</del> has cast<lb/>
of it in <del>[the case of the City of London]</del> <add>from the reign of Charles 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></add> has cast<lb/>
a stigma on the general doctrine: so that it is<lb/>
a stigma on the general doctrine: so that it is<lb/>
not likely to be ever more carried into practise.</p>
not likely to be ever more carried into practise.</p>
Line 14: Line 18:
and inexpedient, <del>For</del> The particular <del>[persons who</del><lb/>
and inexpedient, <del>For</del> The particular <del>[persons who</del><lb/>
<del>have been]</del> delinquents <add>in this way</add> may always be ascertained<lb/>
<del>have been]</del> delinquents <add>in this way</add> may always be ascertained<lb/>
<del>will</del> &amp; that <del>with peculiar facility <gap/> with</del> much<lb/>
<del>with</del> &amp; that <del>with peculiar facility <gap/> with</del> much<lb/>
more easily and infallibly than in the case of ordinary<lb/>
more easily and infallibly than in the case of ordinary<lb/>
offences: their acts being in the very essence<lb/>
offences: their acts being in the very essence<lb/>
Line 20: Line 24:
case such a punishment can always be laid<lb/>
case such a punishment can always be laid<lb/>
on the individuals as shall [constitute a much<add>operate with much</add><lb/>
on the individuals as shall [constitute a much<add>operate with much</add><lb/>
more forcible<add>more force</add> motive] than the trifling punishment<lb/>
more forcible motive] <add>more force</add> than the trifling punishment<lb/>
they would <del>undergo</del><add>sustain</add> in common with their innocent <lb/>
they would <del>undergo</del><add>sustain</add> in common with their innocent <lb/>
b<del>y</del>rethren by the loss of their corporate rights.<lb/>
b<del>y</del>rethren by the loss of their corporate rights.<lb/>
The punishment of forfeiture is therefore with respect<lb/>
The punishment of forfeiture is therefore with respect<lb/>
to all but the particular<add>guilty</add> persons guilty<lb/>
to all but the particular <add>guilty</add> persons guilty,<lb/>
altogether <del>unecess</del> unecessary and mischievous. The<lb/>
altogether <del>unecess</del> unecessary and mischievous. The<lb/>
punishment is sure to fail in respect of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>
punishment is sure to fail in respect of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>
of the abovementioned requisites, and may<add>is very likely</add> very<lb/>
of the abovementioned requisites, and may <add>is very likely</add> very<lb/>
<add>to do so</add>probably in respect of the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p>
<add>to do so</add> probably in respect of the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p>
<p>Our own times have exhibited several instances<lb/>
<p>Our own times have exhibited several instances<lb/>
in which punishment either<add>in reality <del>or <gap/></del></add> <del>has been inflicted</del><lb/>
in which punishment either <del>has been inflicted</del> <add>in reality <del>or to</del></add><lb/>
<del>or has appeared to be</del><add>or to appearance has been</add> inflicted on a <del><gap/></del> body of <add>men</add></p><pb/>
<del>or has appeared to be</del> <add>or to appearance has been</add> inflicted on a <del><gap/></del> body of <add>men</add></p><pb/>
 
 





Revision as of 10:02, 5 January 2016

Click Here To Edit

Punishment in alienam personam Ins:a
Collective punishment
Corporations
of those who form the governing part of it. The
power however of adjudging such a forfeiture
has been very rarely used exercised: and the insidious &
unconstitutional use that was attempted to be made
of it in [the case of the City of London] from the reign of Charles 2d has cast
a stigma on the general doctrine: so that it is
not likely to be ever more carried into practise.

Such a mode of Punishment is plainly unnecessary
and inexpedient, For The particular [persons who
have been] delinquents in this way may always be ascertained
with & that with peculiar facility with much
more easily and infallibly than in the case of ordinary
offences: their acts being in the very essence
of them public & notorious. By the means This being the
case such a punishment can always be laid
on the individuals as shall [constitute a muchoperate with much
more forcible motive] more force than the trifling punishment
they would undergosustain in common with their innocent
byrethren by the loss of their corporate rights.
The punishment of forfeiture is therefore with respect
to all but the particular guilty persons guilty,
altogether unecess unecessary and mischievous. The
punishment is sure to fail in respect of the 1st
of the abovementioned requisites, and may is very likely very
to do so probably in respect of the 2d.

Our own times have exhibited several instances
in which punishment either has been inflicted in reality or to
or has appeared to be or to appearance has been inflicted on a body of men


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/141/137/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

137

Info in main headings field

punishment in alienam personam

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f34 / f35

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48354

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in