JB/541/416/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/541/416/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
S.D.Croft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/541/416/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/541/416/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>11</p>
<p>visit to the spot, I happened a short time ago, by accident, and without
<lb/>
my seeking, to fall into conversation upon the subject of the penitentiary
<lb/>
plan with one of Your Lordship's tenants, a Gardener of the name of <hi rend="underline">Glonie</hi>,
<lb/>
who did not know the relation I bore to it. Beginning the conversation
<lb/>
(for he avowed a suspicion of me on that score) he mentioned it as a
<lb/>
remarkable circumstance, that no part of the land, either <hi rend="underline">is now upon lease</hi>
<lb/>
or has been for these two hundred years. His own part he spoke of as
<lb/>
being 40 Acres: (being the upper part on which the building would be
<lb/>
placed) and he applied the same observation to the remainder in equal
<lb/>
quantity: (which agreed exactly with the quantity detailed in the inquest
<lb/>
of the Jury.) With respect to his own part, I think he can scarcely have
<lb/>
been otherwise than correct, in regard to a circumstance in which he
<lb/>
was so highly interested: and that is the only part for which I should
<lb/>
have occasion, before, Parliament had had time to do its office.</p>
<p>I set out with observing, that lease or no lease is immaterial
<lb/>
to the present purpose: and so Your Lordship will find it to be. Why?
<lb/>
Because the actual immediate possession is equally out of your Lordship's
<lb/>
power as landlord to grant, whether there be or be not a lease, as I well
<lb/>
knew: that must depend at any rate upon the occupying tenants.
<lb/>
Without their consent, to whom I well knew I must have to apply for it
<lb/>
after all, that of the landlord would in point of law be unavailing: since
<lb/>
a tenant <hi rend="underline"><sic>stiled</sic> a tenant at will</hi> is not so far <hi rend="underline">at will</hi>, as that he can
<lb/>
be removed, or his exclusive possession infringed upon, without a certain
<lb/>
interval of notice: and with the consent of the Tenant on the other hand,
<lb/>
a man might have the use he wanted were the landlord ever so averse.
<lb/>
So far then as <hi rend="underline">immediate</hi> possession is concerned, it was the respect due
<lb/>
to Your Lordship, and to what appeared to me to be the rules of propriety
<lb/>
and decorum, and not any necessity in point of law, that was the motive
<lb/>
of my humble application to Your Lordship, to whose decision in that
<lb/>
particular the same Considerations will command my submission; <add>and</add></p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''

Revision as of 19:25, 5 January 2016

Click Here To Edit

11

visit to the spot, I happened a short time ago, by accident, and without
my seeking, to fall into conversation upon the subject of the penitentiary
plan with one of Your Lordship's tenants, a Gardener of the name of Glonie,
who did not know the relation I bore to it. Beginning the conversation
(for he avowed a suspicion of me on that score) he mentioned it as a
remarkable circumstance, that no part of the land, either is now upon lease
or has been for these two hundred years. His own part he spoke of as
being 40 Acres: (being the upper part on which the building would be
placed) and he applied the same observation to the remainder in equal
quantity: (which agreed exactly with the quantity detailed in the inquest
of the Jury.) With respect to his own part, I think he can scarcely have
been otherwise than correct, in regard to a circumstance in which he
was so highly interested: and that is the only part for which I should
have occasion, before, Parliament had had time to do its office.

I set out with observing, that lease or no lease is immaterial
to the present purpose: and so Your Lordship will find it to be. Why?
Because the actual immediate possession is equally out of your Lordship's
power as landlord to grant, whether there be or be not a lease, as I well
knew: that must depend at any rate upon the occupying tenants.
Without their consent, to whom I well knew I must have to apply for it
after all, that of the landlord would in point of law be unavailing: since
a tenant stiled a tenant at will is not so far at will, as that he can
be removed, or his exclusive possession infringed upon, without a certain
interval of notice: and with the consent of the Tenant on the other hand,
a man might have the use he wanted were the landlord ever so averse.
So far then as immediate possession is concerned, it was the respect due
to Your Lordship, and to what appeared to me to be the rules of propriety
and decorum, and not any necessity in point of law, that was the motive
of my humble application to Your Lordship, to whose decision in that
particular the same Considerations will command my submission; and


This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/541/416/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1793-08-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

416

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in