JB/141/139/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/139/003: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
say to Reformers, <hi rend="underline">Serve the whole, but forget not</hi><lb/>
say to Reformers, <hi rend="underline">Serve the whole, but forget not</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">that each member is a part of it.</hi></p>
<hi rend="underline">that each member is a part of it.</hi></p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
 
<head>NOTE</head> <note>(Note continued)<lb/>
<note><hi rend="underline">Note continued</hi><lb/>
Strictly speaking, it is<lb/>
Strictly speaking, it is<lb/>
true, that the Electors<lb/>
true, that the Electors<lb/>
Line 29: Line 29:
you ought not to be<lb/>
you ought not to be<lb/>
trusted with it. If you<lb/>
trusted with it. If you<lb/>
do it is no benefit<lb/>
do it is of no benefit<lb/>
to you, and you can<lb/>
to you, and you can<lb/>
<!-- continues below another marginal note --><lb/>
<!-- continues below another marginal note --><lb/>
Line 36: Line 36:
taken from you for<lb/>
taken from you for<lb/>
the benefit of the State.</note>
the benefit of the State.</note>
<head>NOTE</head>
<head>NOTE</head>
<p>The incapacitated Electors were about sixty: suppose<lb/>
<p>The incapacitated Electors were about sixty: suppose<lb/>
Line 43: Line 44:
to <del>be <gap/></del><add>have been</add> such a number, viz: 580 when added<lb/>
to <del>be <gap/></del><add>have been</add> such a number, viz: 580 when added<lb/>
to the twenty left would make up the whole number<lb/>
to the twenty left would make up the whole number<lb/>
600. I would have had <del><gap/></del> <unclear>ten</unclear> votes given to each <note>Instead of that<lb/>
600. I would have had <del>given</del> ten votes given to each <note>Instead of that<lb/>
they are <gap/> to<lb/>
they are <gap/> to<lb/>
a <gap/> part of<lb/>
a tenth part of<lb/>
their former influence<lb/>
their former influence<lb/>
(value)</note><lb/>
[value]</note><lb/>
of the old electors; their suffrages taken together would<lb/>
of the old electors; their suffrages taken together would<lb/>
then have &amp; born the same proportion to those of the<lb/>
then have &amp; born the same proportion to those of the<lb/>
Line 59: Line 60:
<del>personal affron</del> the <del><gap/></del> First Magistrate of the<lb/>
<del>personal affron</del> the <del><gap/></del> First Magistrate of the<lb/>
state a personal affront <add>bravado</add>, which <del>was</del> exemplified<lb/>
state a personal affront <add>bravado</add>, which <del>was</del> exemplified<lb/>
no self-denial. was attended with no danger,<lb/>
no self-denial, was attended with no danger,<lb/>
&amp; promised no success.</p><pb/>
&amp; promised no success.</p><pb/>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:56, 8 January 2016

Click Here To Edit Note continued

-ished, would have seemed to be rewarded. They certainly Collective punishmt
New Shoreham

would have been rewarded in point ofby the honour.
If a religious attention were constantly to be paid private subsisting
interests which being temporary may always
be provided for at a small expence, reformation and which cannot
be neglected without
injustice,

would be deliver'd from much of that opposition
which it is at present apt to meet with. One may
say to Reformers, Serve the whole, but forget not
that each member is a part of it.

Note continued
Strictly speaking, it is
true, that the Electors
have no reason to complain,
except as above,
upon the occasion of an
extension of the Elective
franchise. The dilemma
is clear: if you
do not mean to discharge
it conscientiously
you ought not to be
trusted with it. If you
do it is of no benefit
to you, and you can

have no ground to
complain of its being
taken from you for
the benefit of the State.

NOTE

The incapacitated Electors were about sixty: suppose
those not incapacitated to have been 20 : The suffrages
of the untainted part were on this supposition of 1/3
part of the whole. Suppose the new-admitted voters
to be have been such a number, viz: 580 when added
to the twenty left would make up the whole number
600. I would have had given ten votes given to each Instead of that
they are to
a tenth part of
their former influence
[value]

of the old electors; their suffrages taken together would
then have & born the same proportion to those of the
rest under the new constitution as under the old one:
for as for 20 is to 60, so is 200 to 600. As those old
ones came to die off, thestanding improvement would have
taken place.

...This was the man to have rewarded with a
statue in the [Palladium] of the Metropolis. This rather
than he whose merit consisted in the offering to
personal affron the First Magistrate of the
state a personal affront bravado, which was exemplified
no self-denial, was attended with no danger,
& promised no success.


---page break---


Identifier: | JB/141/139/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

139

Info in main headings field

punishment in alienam personam

Image

003

Titles

note / deodands / bail

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f39 / f40 / f41 / f42

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48356

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in