★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Letter 3</head> | |||
<p>22 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1802</p> | |||
<p><del>So much for theory, now for</del> <add>Theory has been spoken of—now comes</add> experience: <del>so much for</del> duty <del>now</del><lb/> | |||
<del>Your performance</del> has been spoken of—now comes performance. Even upon<lb/> | |||
the face of the law, the duty is meagre and inefficient: and performance falls<lb/> | |||
short even of the meagre<lb/> | |||
<gap/> so carefully<lb/> | |||
chalked out and narrowed<lb/> | |||
by the law.</p> | |||
<p><del>At</del> <add>By the Act, at</add> the commencement of every Session this Report is to be made.<lb/> | |||
On the 16<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <del>The Session</del> commenced the first session after the appointment.<lb/> | |||
On the |^^^| of Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> the House adjourns and no <add>such</add> Report has<lb/> | |||
<add>been <del>ever</del></add> made. At the very outset, the duty is not done—no<lb/> | |||
not even that <del>meagre portion of</del> <add>beggarly account of empty</add> duty that has been made<lb/> | |||
obligatory by the Act. When <del>which</del> that which is made<lb/> | |||
obligatory is left undone, <add>can there be so much as a hope left for that whole</add> | |||
<del>with that which is made free<lb/> | |||
be done?</del> <add>is <del>free?</del> left free?</add> When that <add>duty</add> which is <del>attended with</del> <add>without</add> <sic>expence</sic><lb/><del>to the office</del> is left undone, will that be done <del>by him</del><lb/>the <sic>expence</sic> of which, if <add>repeated with a certain degree of frequency</add> <del>done <gap/> frequently would</del><lb/><del>eat out a great part of his recompense?</del> <add>would swallow up the only motive for acceptance?</add> | |||
</p> | |||
<p>I have no <add>personal complaint against</add> quarrel with the gentleman. <add>I have not the honour of non personal knowledge of him</add> Knowing no <gap/> of him<lb/> | |||
except as <gap/> <add>of course</add> far be it from me <add>I speak now</add> to say any. Finding him<lb/> | |||
established in ground which I had purchased—to clear the ground<lb/>of him? if it could be done <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add>or say</add> belongs<lb/><add>rights</add> to be of common right <add>were by law</add>.</p> | |||
<p>A gentleman whose duty <add>it was</add> under Your Lordship and the Duke<lb/>of Portland and Your Lordship to have prevented the abuse and<lb/>who <del>if he had not</del> to avoid preventing the abuse <del>wrote that</del><lb/>set aside the two Acts of Parliament by the letter which the D of Portland<lb/><gap/> enough to give <gap/> and signature this <gap/><lb/>instead of preventing the abuse nurses it—he nurses it for<lb/>months and even years. He nurses it still it appears <gap/><lb/>and then came the occasion for recommending a friend to look at<lb/>it. A friend and what friend? A gentleman whose whole time<lb/>had <del>been</del> already been brought for the public and twice over paid<lb/>for it: paid by one Act, now paid by <add>another Act</add> an Act made on purpose.<lb/>Two Acts made for one gentleman: both of them at the instance of<lb/>Your Lordship's Secretary both of them under Your Lordship's<lb/>auspices. One to overpay a man for Duke's <add>business</add> he was already paid<lb/>for which in his own estimation <add>as proved by the very best evidence his own</add> <del>as <gap/></del> by his acceptance he<lb/>had been paid enough already: another to call him off from that<lb/>to other business, pay and overpay still continued one for making him<lb/><gap/> more money: another for making him do less service.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
Letter 3
22 Decr 1802
So much for theory, now for Theory has been spoken of—now comes experience: so much for duty now
Your performance has been spoken of—now comes performance. Even upon
the face of the law, the duty is meagre and inefficient: and performance falls
short even of the meagre
so carefully
chalked out and narrowed
by the law.
At By the Act, at the commencement of every Session this Report is to be made.
On the 16th of Novr The Session commenced the first session after the appointment.
On the |^^^| of Decr the House adjourns and no such Report has
been ever made. At the very outset, the duty is not done—no
not even that meagre portion of beggarly account of empty duty that has been made
obligatory by the Act. When which that which is made
obligatory is left undone, can there be so much as a hope left for that whole
with that which is made free
be done? is free? left free? When that duty which is attended with without expence
to the office is left undone, will that be done by him
the expence of which, if repeated with a certain degree of frequency done frequently would
eat out a great part of his recompense? would swallow up the only motive for acceptance?
I have no personal complaint against quarrel with the gentleman. I have not the honour of non personal knowledge of him Knowing no of him
except as of course far be it from me I speak now to say any. Finding him
established in ground which I had purchased—to clear the ground
of him? if it could be done or say belongs
rights to be of common right were by law.
A gentleman whose duty it was under Your Lordship and the Duke
of Portland and Your Lordship to have prevented the abuse and
who if he had not to avoid preventing the abuse wrote that
set aside the two Acts of Parliament by the letter which the D of Portland
enough to give and signature this
instead of preventing the abuse nurses it—he nurses it for
months and even years. He nurses it still it appears
and then came the occasion for recommending a friend to look at
it. A friend and what friend? A gentleman whose whole time
had been already been brought for the public and twice over paid
for it: paid by one Act, now paid by another Act an Act made on purpose.
Two Acts made for one gentleman: both of them at the instance of
Your Lordship's Secretary both of them under Your Lordship's
auspices. One to overpay a man for Duke's business he was already paid
for which in his own estimation as proved by the very best evidence his own as by his acceptance he
had been paid enough already: another to call him off from that
to other business, pay and overpay still continued one for making him
more money: another for making him do less service.
Identifier: | JB/116/597/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-12-22 |
7 |
||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
597 |
letter 3 |
||
001 |
|||
correspondence |
1 |
||
recto |
d14 / e54 |
||
jeremy bentham |
cw 1799 |
||
c. abbit lees |
|||
1799 |
|||
letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7 |
38130 |
||