JB/141/146/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/146/004: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<note>Inf.<hi rend="superscript">n</hi></note> <head>Punishment in elienam personam</head>
<note>Inf.<hi rend="superscript">n</hi></note> <head>Punishment in elienam personam</head>
<note>Incompetency</note> to others in his presence, or what <add>in any</add> other way others <lb/>
<note>Incompetency</note> <p>to others in his presence, or what <add>in any</add> other way others <lb/>
may suffer for <del>wh</del> want of his evidence. I <del>The Case</del><add>A</add><lb/>
may suffer for <del>wh</del> want of his evidence. I <del>The Case</del><add>A</add><lb/>
<note>Example<lb/>
<note>Example<lb/>
Line 15: Line 15:
that <add>the other</add> <del>one of other had</del> once upon a time <del>before the</del><lb/>
that <add>the other</add> <del>one of other had</del> once upon a time <del>before the</del><lb/>
<del>attestation</del> had been convicted of petty Larceny<lb/>
<del>attestation</del> had been convicted of petty Larceny<lb/>
and been <sic>whipt</sic>.
and been <sic>whipt</sic>. This was before the attestation<lb/>
 
how long it does not appear. The suit was<lb/>
commenced five years afterwards. This man  being<lb/>
deemed a bad witness [and as such not to be heard]<lb/>
there wanted the requisite number and the man<lb/>
in whose favour the will had been made lost<lb/>
the estate. One may imagine the shock to a person<lb/>
who thought he had all the security for his estate<lb/>
which the Law <del>who</del> could give him: one may<lb/>
imagine the surprize and indignation the testator were<lb/>
he to arise out of his grave must feel, at seeing his<lb/>
disposition vacated, by an incident which common<lb/>
prudence could never have prompted him to<lb/>
guard against unless by looking in a man's<lb/>
face he could have told that once in his life he<lb/>
had been guilty of a trifling breach of honesty<lb/>
and been whipt for it.</p>
<p>The limits of this design will not <sic>permitt</sic> one to expatiate<lb/>
upon the subject<add><del>topic</del></add> <del>in detail</del><add>any further</add> by <del><gap/></del> suggesting<lb/>
cases of like mischief that <del><gap/> <gap/></del><add>are liable</add> to happen, or<lb/>
collecting such as are known actually to have happen'd.<lb/>
this general sketch of them being given the intelligent reader will<lb/>
readily excuse me from entering into the details -</p> <pb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:23, 23 January 2016

Click Here To Edit

Inf.n Punishment in elienam personam

Incompetency

to others in his presence, or what in any other way others
may suffer for wh want of his evidence. I The CaseA
Example
+ 2. Wils. 18.
I have already had occasion to quote, the case ofof Pendock and Mackender + may serve as an
example. By the Statute of which is called the
Statute of Frauds and Perjuries, three witnesses
are necessary to a will of land. In this case therethe
werewill had three witnesses or but one of them as it ought to
have. Two stood unimpeached: but it was found turned out
that the other one of other had once upon a time before the
attestation had been convicted of petty Larceny
and been whipt. This was before the attestation
how long it does not appear. The suit was
commenced five years afterwards. This man being
deemed a bad witness [and as such not to be heard]
there wanted the requisite number and the man
in whose favour the will had been made lost
the estate. One may imagine the shock to a person
who thought he had all the security for his estate
which the Law who could give him: one may
imagine the surprize and indignation the testator were
he to arise out of his grave must feel, at seeing his
disposition vacated, by an incident which common
prudence could never have prompted him to
guard against unless by looking in a man's
face he could have told that once in his life he
had been guilty of a trifling breach of honesty
and been whipt for it.

The limits of this design will not permitt one to expatiate
upon the subjecttopic in detailany further by suggesting
cases of like mischief that are liable to happen, or
collecting such as are known actually to have happen'd.
this general sketch of them being given the intelligent reader will
readily excuse me from entering into the details -


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/141/146/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

146

Info in main headings field

punishment in alienam personam

Image

004

Titles

incompetency

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f55 / f56 / f57 / f58

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48363

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in