★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>29 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1803</head> | ||
<p>On this as on <del><gap/></del> all other occasions of necessity,<lb/> | |||
real or apparent, I impute not any moral blame to<lb/> | |||
the Governor: moral blame might for aught I<lb/> | |||
known have been imputable to him, had he done otherwise.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="superscript">(b)</hi> Elsewhere however — I mean <del>here at home</del><lb/> | |||
to his Majesty's "Officers and Ministers" here at home —<lb/> | |||
I see not how <del>Moral blame</del> it can be that moral blame<lb/> | |||
should not be imputable: I mean, if under <hi rend="underline">constitutional</hi><lb/> | |||
blame, <hi rend="underline">moral</hi> be included; — if a regard for the constitution<lb/> | |||
<del>which they as</del> <add>of their country</add> for the "<hi rend="underline">laws and Statutes</hi> <del>can <gap/></del> <add><hi rend="underline">according to</hi>"</add> <hi rend="underline">which</hi> they<lb/> | |||
are thus pledged "<hi rend="underline">to serve</hi>" their Royal Master: have <del>among</del><lb/> | |||
<del>the moral consideration an <gap/> an article in the moral</del> <add>any sort of place among the articles of their moral code.</add><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> of his Officers and Ministers</del> — <del>With</del> <add>Amongst</add> the documents<lb/> | |||
which composed the legal armature of the Governor,<lb/> | |||
was <del>that</del> any such power as that of declaring martial<lb/> | |||
law in that nursery of despotism, included? If so,<lb/> | |||
then has there <add>been</add> in that <gap/> <add>on <del><gap/> their part</add> an open and point-blank<lb/> | |||
<del>gap/> of</del> <add>breach made in</add> this constitutional and hard earned <del>safeguard</del> <add>bulwark</add><lb/> | |||
<del>on the part of his Majesty's Officers and Ministers here at home</del><lb/> | |||
<add>of the Constitution. <del><gap/> <gap/> </del> Again, be this as it may, when </add> <del><gap/> Officer When</del>, with or without precedent, authority<lb/> | |||
from <add>these</add> his Majesty's "Officers and Ministers" <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
martial law had continually been proclaimed<lb/> | |||
was information of such proceeding <add><del><gap/></del> officially transmitted</add> <del>received sent to <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del>by</del> them in consequence — <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <del>If not</del> <add>by the next conveyance and</add> in the way of Official<lb/> | |||
correspondence, <del>at any rate</del> (an omissions not naturally<lb/> | |||
to be presumed) at any rate <add>it was received by them in</add> <del>in 17- it <add>180</add> it has since<lb/> | |||
been received by them if in no other way</del> <add>1798</add> through<lb/> | |||
the medium of the press. It is <add>therefore at any rate</add> with their knowledge<lb/> | |||
that <del>that</del> the <hi rend="underline">Petition of Right</hi> has thus been violated:<lb/> | |||
<add>For this any more than for so many other <add>exercises <del><gap/></del> of unconstitutional power <del><gap/> unconstitutional <gap/></del> <gap/> they ever condescended to apply to Parliament<lb/> | |||
I do not say for <hi rend="underline">precedent</hi> authority — bu <add><del>so</del></add> <del>far</del> so<lb/> | |||
much as for an so post facto indemnity? — not they indeed: no not in any <add>one</add> <del>single</del><lb/> | |||
of the multitude of <gap/> that have called <del>at least</del> for indemnity at least if not for punishment.</p> | |||
<note>Note <hi rend="superscript">(b)</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="superscript">(b)</hi> The note is at the<lb/> | |||
bottom of the preceding page</note> | |||
<note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> That, <del>at</del> one<lb/> | |||
way or other, at one<lb/> | |||
time or other, <del>it has</del><lb/> | |||
<del>been</del> information of<lb/> | |||
this fact has come<lb/> | |||
to their cognizance<lb/> | |||
is beyond dispute:<lb/> | |||
if not</note> | |||
29 Jany 1803
On this as on all other occasions of necessity,
real or apparent, I impute not any moral blame to
the Governor: moral blame might for aught I
known have been imputable to him, had he done otherwise.
(b) Elsewhere however — I mean here at home
to his Majesty's "Officers and Ministers" here at home —
I see not how Moral blame it can be that moral blame
should not be imputable: I mean, if under constitutional
blame, moral be included; — if a regard for the constitution
which they as of their country for the "laws and Statutes can according to" which they
are thus pledged "to serve" their Royal Master: have among
the moral consideration an an article in the moral any sort of place among the articles of their moral code.
of his Officers and Ministers — With Amongst the documents
which composed the legal armature of the Governor,
was that any such power as that of declaring martial
law in that nursery of despotism, included? If so,
then has there been in that on their part an open and point-blank
gap/> of breach made in this constitutional and hard earned safeguard bulwark
on the part of his Majesty's Officers and Ministers here at home
of the Constitution. Again, be this as it may, when Officer When, with or without precedent, authority
from these his Majesty's "Officers and Ministers"
martial law had continually been proclaimed
was information of such proceeding officially transmitted received sent to
by them in consequence — [+] If not by the next conveyance and in the way of Official
correspondence, at any rate (an omissions not naturally
to be presumed) at any rate it was received by them in in 17- it 180 it has since
been received by them if in no other way 1798 through
the medium of the press. It is therefore at any rate with their knowledge
that that the Petition of Right has thus been violated:
For this any more than for so many other <add>exercises of unconstitutional power unconstitutional they ever condescended to apply to Parliament
I do not say for precedent authority — bu <add>so far so
much as for an so post facto indemnity? — not they indeed: no not in any one single
of the multitude of that have called at least for indemnity at least if not for punishment.
Note (b)
(b) The note is at the
bottom of the preceding page
[+] That, at one
way or other, at one
time or other, it has
been information of
this fact has come
to their cognizance
is beyond dispute:
if not
Identifier: | JB/116/371/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1803-01-29 |
|||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
371 |
|||
001 |
note (b) |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
1800 |
||
1800 |
|||
37904 |
|||