JB/106/250/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/106/250/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
delinquency in <del>any</del> respect of any part of his political duty or power<lb/>
delinquency in <del>any</del> respect of any part of his political duty or power<lb/>
<del>a member of the official established</del><lb/>
<del>a member of the official established</del><lb/>
is imputed to any member of the Official<add>governing body</add> Establishment<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <del>Of</del>  say the <gap/><lb/>
is imputed to any member of the Official <add>governing body</add> Establishment<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <del>Of</del>  say the <gap/><lb/>
is included</note><lb/>
is included</note><lb/>
of the state or to the whole as any branch of that body<lb/>
of the state or to the whole as any branch of that body<lb/>
Line 31: Line 31:
<p>Nor that of any person on whom the imputation <note>nor that of any<lb/>
<p>Nor that of any person on whom the imputation <note>nor that of any<lb/>
person on whom the<lb/>
person on whom the<lb/>
imputation attaches</note><lb/>
imputation attaches<lb/></note>
attaches: the <add>as </add> vexation liable to be produced by answer<lb/>
attaches: the <add>as </add> vexation liable to be produced by answer<lb/>
made to questions tending to the extraction of such evidence<lb/>
made to questions tending to the extraction of such evidence,<lb/>
affords not any receivable ground for the exclusion<lb/>
affords not any receivable ground for the exclusion<lb/>
of it: that is for forbidding such question to be put.<add>(a)</add></p>
of it: that is for forbidding such question to be put.<add>(a)</add></p>
Line 49: Line 49:
<p>Not <del><gap/></del> to afford those facilities for defence against a<lb/>
<p>Not <del><gap/></del> to afford those facilities for defence against a<lb/>
suit for political defamation or vituperation would be <lb/>
suit for political defamation or vituperation would be <lb/>
employ the present Code in the character if a support to misrule <note>-conduct upon the smaller <add>and the production of mischief</add><lb/>
employ the present Code in the character of a support to misrule <note>-conduct upon the smaller <add>and the production of mischief</add><lb/>
scales</note><lb/>
scales</note><lb/>
to misrule in <add>in a word to tyranny</add> every imaginable degree.  It would be to <lb/>
to misrule in <add>in a word to tyranny</add> every imaginable degree.  It would be to <lb/>

Revision as of 17:44, 4 February 2016

Click Here To Edit

1818 July 3 Penal Code

Extra Printing is are includes writing

If in any printed written (1) and published discourse In case of defamation
of official persons
dependant to be at

liberty to plead and
prove the truth of
the imputation

delinquency in any respect of any part of his political duty or power
a member of the official established
is imputed to any member of the Official governing body Establishment+ + Of say the
is included

of the state or to the whole as any branch of that body
collectively and in respect of such imputation the author
or any person concerned in the production or publication of
it be sued as for wrongful defamation or vitu Wrongful Vituperation,
the defendant shall be at liberty to plead the
truth of the imputation, and to prove the truth of it by
all such evidence as he can produce.

From the best of the species of evidence thus producible Defendants own
evidence not excluded

that of the defendant himself is not excluded

Nor that of any person on whom the imputation nor that of any
person on whom the
imputation attaches
attaches: the as vexation liable to be produced by answer
made to questions tending to the extraction of such evidence,
affords not any receivable ground for the exclusion
of it: that is for forbidding such question to be put.(a)

Note (a)

(a) The Provisions to this effect the proper places are the Code of
Procedure: and in it the division of which Evidence is the
subject.[+] The name use of them being brought to view in the [+] The non-exclusionary
system there proposed
will be seen to extend
not to this case alone
but to all others

place is that the nature of the here proposed check on
misrule, may be the more plainly understood.

Not to afford those facilities for defence against a
suit for political defamation or vituperation would be
employ the present Code in the character of a support to misrule -conduct upon the smaller and the production of mischief
scales

to misrule in in a word to tyranny every imaginable degree. It would be to
support and excite misconduct upon the largest scaleand produce mischief, which inby the
very work had for the discarded object the checking of misconduct


---page break---






Identifier: | JB/106/250/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1818-07-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

106

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

250

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::c1[?]]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34838

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in