JB/121/343/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/343/001: Difference between revisions

ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<note>9 July 1801</note>
<note>9 July 1801</note>
<p>The idea of obligation was rejected plainly and simply:<lb/>
<p>The idea of obligation was rejected plainly and simply:<lb/>
rejected as inapplicable not only to the case in<lb/>
rejected as inapplicable not only <del>in ma</del> to the case in<lb/>
hand but to any other that could be supposed. In speaking<lb/>
hand but to any other that could be supposed. In speaking<lb/>
of cobwebs, I fell short of the mark: Cobwebs, though no <add>one ineffectual</add><lb/>
of cobwebs, I fell short of the mark: Cobwebs, though no <add>one ineffectual</add><lb/>
<add>resistance</add> bar might afford <add> oppose <del><gap/></del></add> obstruction <add>resistance</add> and annoyance:<lb/>
<add>resistance</add> bar might afford <add> oppose <del><gap/></del></add> obstruction <add>resistance</add> and annoyance: <del><gap/></del><lb/>
Acts <add>of</add> <del>and</del> Parliament <add>in any number</add> <del>and</del> engagements were I should not have<lb/>
Acts <del>and</del> <add>of</add> Parliament <add>in any number</add> <del>and</del> engagements were I should not have<lb/>
said cobwebs but <add>I should have said</add> moonshine to <add>Secretaries</add> First Lords of the<lb/>
said cobwebs but <add>I should have said</add> moonshine to First Lords <add>Secretaries</add> of the<lb/>
Treasury and Secretaries of State. Were I inclined to<lb/>
Treasury and Secretaries of State. Were I inclined to<lb/>
exaggerate all the hyperboles I could find or make would<lb/>
exaggerate all the hyperboles I could find or make would<lb/>
Line 19: Line 19:
denying the existence of either&#x2014;how is it possible to<lb/>
denying the existence of either&#x2014;how is it possible to<lb/>
exaggerate!</p>
exaggerate!</p>
<p><add>On this occasion the description of</add> In this score it would be an act of injustice to<lb/>
<p><add>On this occasion <del><gap/></del> the description of</add> In this score it would be an act of injustice to<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hiley Addington not to <add>observe</add> acknowledge that his part<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hiley Addington not to acknowledge <add>observe</add> that his part<lb/>
in it <add>seemed rather</add> a subordinate one. The doctrines were<lb/>
in it <del>was</del> <add>seemed rather</add> a subordinate one. The doctrines were<lb/>
laid down principally if not exclusively by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long.<lb/>
laid down principally if not exclusively by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long.<lb/>
<del>His</del> Informant <add>of the oracles</add> rather than invention was the task of his<lb/>
<del>His</del> Informant <add>of the oracles</add> rather than invention was the task of his<lb/>
<add>new-interred successors</add> successors in office. Being from <add>what</add> every judgment I could<lb/>
successors <add>new-interred successors</add> in office. Being from every <add>what</add> judgment I could<lb/>
make in so short an interview a good natured man&#x2014;his<lb/>
make in so short an interview a good natured man&#x2014;his<lb/>
hue and manner were adapted to the task <add>more <gap/> <gap/> part: the part</add> of soothing<lb/>
hue and manner were adapted to the task <add>more <gap/> <gap/> part: the part</add> of soothing<lb/>
and smoothing away by a mixture of reproof and kindness<lb/>
and smoothing away by a mixture of reproof and kindness<lb/>
such obstinacy as mine. His words were as<lb/>
such obstinacy as mine. His words were as<lb/>
oil to the vinegar which I had been made<lb/>
oil to the vinegar <del><gap/> <gap/></del> which I had been used<lb/>
to receive <add>in the few, as few as possible, occasions in which till now</add> any thing could be squeezed<lb/>
to receive <add>in the few, as few as possible, occasions, on which till now</add> any thing could be squeezed<lb/>
out of the other <gap/>. All the axioms whether of<lb/>
out of the other <gap/>. All the axioms whether of<lb/>
politics or issues advanced by his learned head  
politics or issues advanced by his learned head  
Line 39: Line 39:
of the <add>famed</add> distinction between absolute and limited monarchies&#x2014;<lb/>
of the <add>famed</add> distinction between absolute and limited monarchies&#x2014;<lb/>
<del>about the</del><lb/>
<del>about the</del><lb/>
<add>aboue</add></p>
<add>about</add></p>
<note> that had been laid down<lb/>by  this <gap/>-<gap/></note>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:44, 31 March 2016

'Click Here To Edit

24 Aug. 1802

9 July 1801

The idea of obligation was rejected plainly and simply:
rejected as inapplicable not only in ma to the case in
hand but to any other that could be supposed. In speaking
of cobwebs, I fell short of the mark: Cobwebs, though no one ineffectual
resistance bar might afford oppose obstruction resistance and annoyance:
Acts and of Parliament in any number and engagements were I should not have
said cobwebs but I should have said moonshine to First Lords Secretaries of the
Treasury and Secretaries of State. Were I inclined to
exaggerate all the hyperboles I could find or make would
not enable me to exaggerate. In speaking of him who
over and over again and in a time of contempt disdain
and scorn disclaims all regard to laws—all regard
to engagements—holds himself bound by neither—not
denying the existence of either—how is it possible to
exaggerate!

On this occasion the description of In this score it would be an act of injustice to
Mr Hiley Addington not to acknowledge observe that his part
in it was seemed rather a subordinate one. The doctrines were
laid down principally if not exclusively by Mr Long.
His Informant of the oracles rather than invention was the task of his
successors new-interred successors in office. Being from every what judgment I could
make in so short an interview a good natured man—his
hue and manner were adapted to the task more part: the part of soothing
and smoothing away by a mixture of reproof and kindness
such obstinacy as mine. His words were as
oil to the vinegar which I had been used
to receive in the few, as few as possible, occasions, on which till now any thing could be squeezed
out of the other . All the axioms whether of
politics or issues advanced by his learned head were
so many to
all that the the declining that the of parliaments about the futility
of the famed distinction between absolute and limited monarchies—
about the
about

that had been laid down
by this -



Identifier: | JB/121/343/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-08-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon versus New South Wales

Folio number

343

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F11

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in