JB/149/144/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/149/144/001: Difference between revisions

ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
one third of the money, but probably for considerably<lb/>
one third of the money, but probably for considerably<lb/>
less. It would then indeed be necessary for<lb/>
less. It would then indeed be necessary for<lb/>
Parliament to act above board to speak of<lb/>
Parliament to act <del><gap/></del> above board to speak of<lb/>
itself as doing what it meant to do&#x2014;to throw off<lb/>
itself as doing what it meant to do&#x2014;to throw off<lb/>
disguises, and to look its own proceedings in the<lb/>
disguises, and to look its own proceedings in the<lb/>
face. The same number of persons who now<lb/>
face. The same number of persons who now <add>+</add><lb/>
find means to escape their <add>secretly</add> intended doom, might<lb/>
find means to escape their <add>secretly</add> intended doom, might<lb/>
then be exempted from the succedaneum <add>succedaneous doom</add> proposed,<lb/>
then be exempted from the succedaneum <add>succedaneous doom</add> proposed,<lb/>
but with this difference, that the <add>exceptions</add> selections<lb/>
but with this difference, that the selections <add>exceptions</add><lb/>
would be the result&#x2014;not of chance, or (what is<lb/>
would be the result&#x2014;not of chance, or (what is<lb/>
worse) connection with guilty opulence&#x2014;but<lb/>
worse) connection with guilty opulence&#x2014;but<lb/>
Line 47: Line 47:
that Your Committee<lb/>
that Your Committee<lb/>
has in view)</note>
has in view)</note>
<note>to have done</note>


<note><del>with or without the law</del><lb/>
<note><del>with or without the law</del><lb/>
<del>on their side</del></note>
<del>on their side</del></note>


<note>under or without the <add>allowance</add> <del>favour</del><lb/>
<note>under or without the <del>favour</del> <add>allowance</add> <lb/>
of the law.</note>
of the law.</note>



Revision as of 17:03, 31 March 2016

Click Here To Edit

Police Report
Expence of Punishment
N.S. Wales.

But of this sort of security should seriously be
thought fit to be purchased and worth purchasing
at any such price,+ viz: injustice it might surely be worth
considering whether a similar but superior degree
of security might not be capable of being purchased at some inferior
price. If instead of a wild country
under a military government a government without
regular controul at 8 months the distance of
an 8 months voyage from every thing a man
holds dear, the scene of his confinement were
to be a tract of land, walled in indeed for safe-
custody, but spacious enough to be stiled a
Farm,+ the change though on the supposed case
as in the actual one the confinement were to be
for life) the change would even thus be such
as the party would have little reason, and probably
be little disposed, to complain of. In this
case a degree of security which is now attempted
to be bought, but which is not to be bought for £44
a head might be bought at the worst for
one third of the money, but probably for considerably
less. It would then indeed be necessary for
Parliament to act above board to speak of
itself as doing what it meant to do—to throw off
disguises, and to look its own proceedings in the
face. The same number of persons who now +
find means to escape their secretly intended doom, might
then be exempted from the succedaneum succedaneous doom proposed,
but with this difference, that the selections exceptions
would be the result—not of chance, or (what is
worse) connection with guilty opulence—but
mercy with wisdom for its guide. And Mr Bentham
to whom Your Committee have communicated are indebted for this idea
ready to do what depends upon him for carrying it into
effect.II

+ it is
Your Committee (have
the intended Penitentiary
Establishment in view
that Your Committee
has in view)

to have done

with or without the law
on their side

under or without the favour allowance
of the law.

II Appendix
Mr Bentham's examination.



Identifier: | JB/149/144/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

144

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d17

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49998

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in