JB/541/466/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/541/466/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/541/466/001" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
favour of your Packet, and shou'd
favour of your Packet, and shou'd
<lb/>
<lb/>
have thanked you for it sooner
have thanked you for it sooner,
<lb/>
<lb/>
if I had not been carried to distant
if I had not been carried to distant

Revision as of 14:25, 13 April 2016

Click Here To Edit

Bishopthorpe Sept. 17. 173 1793

Dear Sir

I have received the
favour of your Packet, and shou'd
have thanked you for it sooner,
if I had not been carried to distant
parts of my Diocese, by my necessary
Business. I am newly returned
and have not had time to give
much Consideration to the Substance
of your Letter.

When the Subject was originally
discussed, I do not remember that
I ever gave it any proposal, or
that I ever was in any temper of
mind but that of a passive Regnescence.
As to the wisdom and




Identifier: | JB/541/466/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1793-09-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

466

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

"William Markham, Archbishop of York"

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in