JB/120/088/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/088/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Charges against White</head>
 
<p>24 Mar 1802</p>
 
<p>but when the said Jeremy Bentham requested him<lb/>
to <del>appoint</del> point out to him such clause or<lb/>
clauses of the said Act as so appeared to him<lb/>
to be incompatible as also that he would hear<lb/>
<add>a review in writing</add> from he said Jeremy Bentham either then<lb/>
or at any other time more convenient to him<lb/>
the statements &amp; reasons on which the said<lb/>
application had been grounded he the said<lb/>
Joseph White did then &amp; there utterly refuse<lb/>
at that time or any other either to <gap/><lb/>
the said Act or to hold any communication<lb/>
whatever with or so ready or hear any thing<lb/>
from the said Jeremy Bentham on the said<lb/>
subject &amp; the better <add>more effectually</add> to put an end to all<lb/>
further application &amp; applications relative<lb/>
to the same to the said Joseph White did<lb/>
immediately <sic>transmitt</sic> to the said Board<lb/>
such his Report by letter dated on that same<lb/>
day.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:36, 25 April 2016

Click Here To Edit

Charges against White

24 Mar 1802

but when the said Jeremy Bentham requested him
to appoint point out to him such clause or
clauses of the said Act as so appeared to him
to be incompatible as also that he would hear
a review in writing from he said Jeremy Bentham either then
or at any other time more convenient to him
the statements & reasons on which the said
application had been grounded he the said
Joseph White did then & there utterly refuse
at that time or any other either to
the said Act or to hold any communication
whatever with or so ready or hear any thing
from the said Jeremy Bentham on the said
subject & the better more effectually to put an end to all
further application & applications relative
to the same to the said Joseph White did
immediately transmitt to the said Board
such his Report by letter dated on that same
day.



Identifier: | JB/120/088/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-03-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

088

Info in main headings field

charges against white

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f11

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

39914

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in