JB/120/100/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/100/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>N.S. Wales</head>
 
<p>11 June 1802</p>
<p>3. Incapacitation<lb/>
Fraud upon the<lb/>
legislature proved.</p>
<p>That the <add>affections of the</add> patrons of the Act of 1779 were very<lb/>
anxiously bent upon the principal object of that Act<lb/>
the Penitentiary Establishment I have occasion to know<lb/>
and the Act itself <del>declares</del> <add>expresses</add> as much: that with those affections<lb/>
<del>there</del> their views should have pointed to any such<lb/>
discordant object as that of <del>establishing an institution</del><lb/>
applying to the same purpose a spot at the antipodes<lb/>
<add>removed as far as possible</add><lb/>
out of the inspection of every body that was not sent<lb/>
<del>on purpose</del> all mankind is repugnant to the principles<lb/>
so often manifested by them in print.</p>
<p>That the Penitentiary <del>object</del> system still continued<lb/>
to be an object and therefore I conclude the sole object<lb/>
till 1783, <add>I can not but believe</add> knowing from the best authority, that<lb/>
for considerations purely temporary it was <add>at that time that it was laid</add> set aside at<lb/>
<del>that</del> time. M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose<add>+</add>, in the conversation I have <add>already</add> had<lb/>
occasion to touch upon) took <add>assumed</add> to himself the merit of<lb/>
the suspension there put, and which though meant by<lb/>
his <add>their</add> superior <add>in office to be</add> as but temporary, the reasons being but<lb/>
temporary (the extreme distress of the Treasury before the conclusion<lb/>
of the peace) was meant by him I suppose<lb/>
to be perpetual: the reasons assigned by him to can<lb/>
be such, <add>had they been true in fact</add> as apply to one time as well as another:<lb/>
viz: the supposed <del>enormous</del> <add>enormity of the</add> <sic>expence</sic>: <del>of it <add>viz:</add></del> in
<del>comparison<lb/>
of</del> of which a little further on. In the division<lb/>
<del>of that took</del> in that same year took place in the distribution<lb/>
of Treasury labour, the <add>superior</add> province of eloquence<lb/>
falling to the share of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt, the province of economy<lb/>
fell of course to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose. To M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose will therefore<lb/>
belong, without dispute the merit of the choice made of New<lb/>
South Wales with the merits of all kinds appertaining<lb/>
<note>to that choice</note></p><note><add>+</add> being <add>already</add> in that same<lb/>year Secretary to the<lb/>Treasury M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose.</note>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:58, 25 April 2016

Click Here To Edit

N.S. Wales

11 June 1802

3. Incapacitation
Fraud upon the
legislature proved.

That the affections of the patrons of the Act of 1779 were very
anxiously bent upon the principal object of that Act
the Penitentiary Establishment I have occasion to know
and the Act itself declares expresses as much: that with those affections
there their views should have pointed to any such
discordant object as that of establishing an institution
applying to the same purpose a spot at the antipodes
removed as far as possible
out of the inspection of every body that was not sent
on purpose all mankind is repugnant to the principles
so often manifested by them in print.

That the Penitentiary object system still continued
to be an object and therefore I conclude the sole object
till 1783, I can not but believe knowing from the best authority, that
for considerations purely temporary it was at that time that it was laid set aside at
that time. Mr Rose+, in the conversation I have already had
occasion to touch upon) took assumed to himself the merit of
the suspension there put, and which though meant by
his their superior in office to be as but temporary, the reasons being but
temporary (the extreme distress of the Treasury before the conclusion
of the peace) was meant by him I suppose
to be perpetual: the reasons assigned by him to can
be such, had they been true in fact as apply to one time as well as another:
viz: the supposed enormous enormity of the expence: of it viz: in comparison
of
of which a little further on. In the division
of that took in that same year took place in the distribution
of Treasury labour, the superior province of eloquence
falling to the share of Mr Pitt, the province of economy
fell of course to Mr Rose. To Mr Rose will therefore
belong, without dispute the merit of the choice made of New
South Wales with the merits of all kinds appertaining
to that choice

+ being already in that same
year Secretary to the
Treasury Mr Rose.



Identifier: | JB/120/100/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-06-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

100

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cs 1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

george elrick

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

39926

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in