JB/120/093/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/093/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Long and Forgery</head>
 
<p>12 May 1802</p>
 
<p>These are two very different <add>distinct</add> parties, to whom as many<lb/>
distinct injuries may be seen to be done in the same <add>certain cases</add> circumstances<lb/>
by the same act of forgery: the person to whose prejudice<lb/>
in a pecuniary or any other way the imposition is practiced<lb/>
and the person upon whom it is practiced. Among<lb/>
individuals it is to my prejudice <add>at least</add> in the first instance<lb/>
in a pecuniary way that the injury was done the<lb/>
imposition practiced, by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long: but it is upon<lb/>
the Treasury Board, that is upon such of the Members<lb/>
whose signatures or whose acquiescence was obtained<lb/>
on the several occasions that the imposition was on<lb/>
those occasions practiced by their Secretary. For no<lb/>
inconsiderable part if not the whole of the time during<lb/>
which such impositions were <del>to be</del> continuing to be<lb/>
practiced, the <del>Noble Lord</del> Board had the advantage<lb/>
of numbering <add>reckoning</add> this same Noble Lord <add>in the number of</add> among its Members.<lb/>
By a proper examination of the Minute<lb/>
Books it would appear whether on any one or more<lb/>
of those occasions the Noble Lord was of the number<lb/>
of the Members to whose injury in this way the<lb/>
<del>forgery</del> fraud&#x2014;the forgery was committed. It would<lb/>
be a spectacle equally beneficial and instructive to the<lb/>
public to behold his Lordship in his place in Parliament<lb/>
making for the second <add>time</add> the application of his own<lb/>
principles, and for this time to his own experience.<lb/>
What mountains would not the sinner <add>sinners</add> call upon to<lb/>
cover him <add>them</add> while, with the fire of his <add>independent spirit</add> independence<lb/>
<add>indignation</add> and the thunders of his eloquence the justly offended<lb/>
judge was hunting down upon their devoted heads the<lb/>
reproach of this <add>forgery</add>.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:14, 25 April 2016

Click Here To Edit

Long and Forgery

12 May 1802

These are two very different distinct parties, to whom as many
distinct injuries may be seen to be done in the same certain cases circumstances
by the same act of forgery: the person to whose prejudice
in a pecuniary or any other way the imposition is practiced
and the person upon whom it is practiced. Among
individuals it is to my prejudice at least in the first instance
in a pecuniary way that the injury was done the
imposition practiced, by Mr Long: but it is upon
the Treasury Board, that is upon such of the Members
whose signatures or whose acquiescence was obtained
on the several occasions that the imposition was on
those occasions practiced by their Secretary. For no
inconsiderable part if not the whole of the time during
which such impositions were to be continuing to be
practiced, the Noble Lord Board had the advantage
of numbering reckoning this same Noble Lord in the number of among its Members.
By a proper examination of the Minute
Books it would appear whether on any one or more
of those occasions the Noble Lord was of the number
of the Members to whose injury in this way the
forgery fraud—the forgery was committed. It would
be a spectacle equally beneficial and instructive to the
public to behold his Lordship in his place in Parliament
making for the second time the application of his own
principles, and for this time to his own experience.
What mountains would not the sinner sinners call upon to
cover him them while, with the fire of his independent spirit independence
indignation and the thunders of his eloquence the justly offended
judge was hunting down upon their devoted heads the
reproach of this forgery.



Identifier: | JB/120/093/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-05-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

093

Info in main headings field

long and forgery

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39919

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in