JB/120/119/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/120/119/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
<del>the existence of a determination to that same effect</del><lb/>
<del>the existence of a determination to that same effect</del><lb/>
<del>at a preceding period there is certainly no</del><lb/>
<del>at a preceding period there is certainly no</del><lb/>
<del>want of inconsistency.- But</del>
<del>want of inconsistency.- But</del> if the inconsistency, of<lb/>
the conduct thus delineated and imputed, were to<lb/>
be received as an objection to the truth and accurracy<lb/>
of the delineation itself - actors as culpable<lb/>
transactions would be in a very commodious situation<lb/>
<add>&#x2014;</add> <del>and <gap/></del> those, to whose lot iell to be<lb/>
the historiographers of such transactions, <del><gap/></del>in a very<lb/>
disadvantageous one.  <del>If this</del>
as good logic <add>of one imputed him of conduct to be admitted as a conclusive<lb/>
proof<add><del><gap/></del></add></add><add>of the un-reality of it</add> no act so flagitious but might <lb/>
be commited with impunity, on the single condition <lb/>
of mixing up a certasin dose of inconsistency<lb/>
in the composition of it.<add><del>[+]</del></add> <gap/> would then <note><add>[+]</add> At this rate, as<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the appearance<lb/>
of <del><gap/></del> inconsistency<lb/>
to a degree of</note><lb/>
 
 
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:24, 14 May 2016

Click Here To Edit

5 Mar 1802 +Before12 Conn Obs

SS4 Symptom

Between the assurance given to Lord Belgrave
of the determination to sacrifice the establishment to of the establishment being sacrificed for his sake and
the existence of a determination to that same effect
at a preceding period there is certainly no
want of inconsistency.- But if the inconsistency, of
the conduct thus delineated and imputed, were to
be received as an objection to the truth and accurracy
of the delineation itself - actors as culpable
transactions would be in a very commodious situation
and those, to whose lot iell to be
the historiographers of such transactions, in a very
disadvantageous one. If this as good logic of one imputed him of conduct to be admitted as a conclusive
proof<add>
</add>of the un-reality of it no act so flagitious but might
be commited with impunity, on the single condition
of mixing up a certasin dose of inconsistency
in the composition of it.[+] would then [+] At this rate, as
the appearance
of inconsistency
to a degree of





Identifier: | JB/120/119/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-03-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

15

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

119

Info in main headings field

symptoms

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d12 / e2 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39945

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in