JB/120/042/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/042/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Emily.K (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Mr Bentham's Evidence</head> <note>5</note><lb/>
 
<p>if Persons as well as local Situation were at the same Time to<lb/>
be comprehended in the Change. This Idea I have accordingly<lb/>
ventured to suggest, and though it has not yet been complied<lb/>
with, the Reception given to it was not altogether a discouraging<lb/>
one.<lb/></p>
 
<p>As to the Annual Allowance per Head, since the Approbation<lb/>
give to my demand of £12,(which was in July 1793)<lb/>
the Allowance to the present Contractors on the Hulk Plan has<lb/>
throughout been raised a Penny a Day per Head, amounting<lb/>
by the year to £1..10<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>..5<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>; the Rise in the Price of Provisions<lb/>
having been the evident ground of the Allowance, the same<lb/>
Indemnification would not, I suppose, be thought unreasonable<lb/>
in my Case.<lb/></p>
<p>Question 3.- Do you think you should now be able to exhibit<lb/>
Vouchers for, or distinct Statements of, the Expenditure of the £9,000 you speak of?-</p>
 
Answer. - I have taken Care to preserve Vouchers for the<lb/>
Money expended in Materials for the Building itself, to an amount<lb/>
more than equal to what I have received: as above; and for the<lb/>
Rest, I should that satisfactory Vouchers might be collected,<lb/>
although, the Money being my own and no Conception entertained<lb/>
of any Occasion for accounting to or with any Body<lb/>
on the Subject, I had no Reason for keepign Vouchers as such.<lb/>
In March 1973, on my applying for the £2,000, which I<lb/>
did through Mr Nepean (then Under Secretary in the Home<lb/>
Department) my Brother delivered or produced to that Gentleman<lb/>
a hasty sketch of an Account, drawn up in obedience to a<lb/>
Suggestion made at the Moment for that Purpose. At that<lb/>
early Stage of the Concern it contained (I remember) Articles to<lb/>
the Amount of above £4,600, after which it was needless<lb/>
to look out for more. Upwards of £500 of it was for Patents<lb/>
which are become of so old a Date, that before I<lb/>
could<lb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 12:59, 21 May 2016

Click Here To Edit

Mr Bentham's Evidence 5

if Persons as well as local Situation were at the same Time to
be comprehended in the Change. This Idea I have accordingly
ventured to suggest, and though it has not yet been complied
with, the Reception given to it was not altogether a discouraging
one.

As to the Annual Allowance per Head, since the Approbation
give to my demand of £12,(which was in July 1793)
the Allowance to the present Contractors on the Hulk Plan has
throughout been raised a Penny a Day per Head, amounting
by the year to £1..10s..5d; the Rise in the Price of Provisions
having been the evident ground of the Allowance, the same
Indemnification would not, I suppose, be thought unreasonable
in my Case.

Question 3.- Do you think you should now be able to exhibit
Vouchers for, or distinct Statements of, the Expenditure of the £9,000 you speak of?-

Answer. - I have taken Care to preserve Vouchers for the
Money expended in Materials for the Building itself, to an amount
more than equal to what I have received: as above; and for the
Rest, I should that satisfactory Vouchers might be collected,
although, the Money being my own and no Conception entertained
of any Occasion for accounting to or with any Body
on the Subject, I had no Reason for keepign Vouchers as such.
In March 1973, on my applying for the £2,000, which I
did through Mr Nepean (then Under Secretary in the Home
Department) my Brother delivered or produced to that Gentleman
a hasty sketch of an Account, drawn up in obedience to a
Suggestion made at the Moment for that Purpose. At that
early Stage of the Concern it contained (I remember) Articles to
the Amount of above £4,600, after which it was needless
to look out for more. Upwards of £500 of it was for Patents
which are become of so old a Date, that before I
could







Identifier: | JB/120/042/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

042

Info in main headings field

mr bentham's evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39868

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in