JB/120/125/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/125/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
<p><del>SS.4. Prior entry Backstockings of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose</del></p>
<p><del>SS.4. Prior entry Backstockings of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose</del></p>


<add>It is this deeper-seated, and simply probable hypothesis,</add> <del>The mention of this<add>the</add> other hypothesis - that</del><lb/>
<p><add>It is this deeper-seated, and simply probable hypothesis,</add> <del>The mention of this<add>the</add> other hypothesis - that</del><lb/>
<del>of a much earlier commencement to the design</del><lb/>
<del>of a much earlier commencement to the design</del><lb/>
<del>of setting <add>laying</add> the whole plan aside <add>upon the shelf</add> a design</del><lb/>
<del>of setting <add>laying</add> the whole plan aside <add>upon the shelf</add> a design</del><lb/>
Line 14: Line 14:
<del>the Salisbury estate and consequently <gap/>pted</del><lb/>
<del>the Salisbury estate and consequently <gap/>pted</del><lb/>
<del>with the termination of <gap/>applying it <add>that estate</add> to</del><lb/>
<del>with the termination of <gap/>applying it <add>that estate</add> to</del><lb/>
<del>its pretended use this collectively <add>when considered</add>, if from</del><lb/>
<del>which I <gap/> note <gap/> to disentangle the</del><lb/>
<del>history in such means as to leave it intelligible</del> <lb/><add>that</add> renders it necessary for me to <lb/>
interactive upon this occasion a personage
<del>distorted to figures <add>hereinafter</add> in this <add>an</add> earlier parts of</del><lb/>
<add>whose <del>portrait</del><add>pertraiture</add></add><add> might otherwise have been reserved  for the history<lb/>
of an earlier period &#x2014;</add> <del>the history - </del> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Secretary Rose. <note>+ may not his apparently<lb/>
taking it up have<lb/>
been a fault - to keep it<lb/>
down in favour of the Hulks</note></p>





Revision as of 08:44, 5 June 2016

Click Here To Edit

29 Jany 1802 + Before B1 18 Connectg Observ
SS4 Tergiversation of Mr Rose
Tegiversation

SS.4. Prior entry Backstockings of Mr Rose

It is this deeper-seated, and simply probable hypothesis, The mention of thisthe other hypothesis - that
of a much earlier commencement to the design
of setting laying the whole plan aside upon the shelf a design
anterior to the very proposition for the purchase of
the Salisbury estate and consequently pted
with the termination of applying it that estate to
its pretended use this collectively when considered, if from
which I note to disentangle the
history in such means as to leave it intelligible
that renders it necessary for me to
interactive upon this occasion a personage distorted to figures hereinafter in this an earlier parts of
whose portrait<add>pertraiture</add> might otherwise have been reserved for the history
of an earlier period —
the history - Mr Secretary Rose. + may not his apparently
taking it up have
been a fault - to keep it
down in favour of the Hulks






Identifier: | JB/120/125/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-01-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

125

Info in main headings field

tergiversation of mr rose

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d18 / f18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

39951

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in