JB/097/187/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/097/187/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>13 July 1802</head>
<head>N.S. Wales</head>
 
<note>Conduct<lb/>
III. Non-existence proved<lb/>
(a)
37 <del>47</del><lb/>
Specimens of the<lb/>
Uncertainties and<lb/>
deficiencies in the<lb/>
previous heads in<lb/>
the Act for the<lb/>
establishment of the<lb/>
necessary <gap/> of<lb/>
laws in N. S. Wales<lb/>
1. This realm<lb/>
2. Civil <gap/></note>
 
<p>Notes to <hi rend="underline">this realm</hi> 27 G.3. c. 2</p>
 
<p><hi rend="superscript">a</hi> Obliged to <del><gap/> these words</del> <add>copy from the Act the words</add> <hi rend="underline">"this realm"</hi>, it is impossible<lb/>
<del>for me</del> <add><del>my <gap/></del></add> to avoid returning to what a degree a <del>what little <gap/></del> <add>even</add><lb/>
the <del>inadequate</del> <add>scanty</add> scrap of power <add>undertaken <del><gap/></del> to be created by it</del></add> <del><gap/> it appears <gap/> <gap/> been</del><lb/>
<del>in contemplation to <gap/> by the Act</del> is born <del>to pieces</del> <add>in tatters</add><lb/>
<del>and rendered <gap/></del> by these two words: a proof how<lb/>
compleatly incompetent the draughtsman was to his task, <del>and</del><lb/>
how little of the mind of <del>the</del> <add>a</add> legislation was bestowed upon<lb/>
this business, and how <del>the</del> slight <del>the</del> <add>any</add> inference that can be<lb/>
drawn, frm what was actually done by it, to what was intended<lb/>
is <del>otherwise</del> in contemplation to be done. <hi rend="underline">This realm</hi><lb/>
what realm? <del>What was the <gap/> an offence be</del> <add><del>Under</del> <add>Against</add> the law of what realm</add> must an<lb/>
act be an offence to be triable under the Court so constituted?<lb/>
<del>if</del> against the law of England? of Scotland? or of <add>Great Britain</add> both together?<lb/>
<del><gap/> of Great Britain?</del> If an act being an offence - not<lb/>
against any law passed since the union, but only <add>against the law of England as it stood</add> before the<lb/>
union <add>if such an act</add> be an offence triable in this court, so must an act<lb/>
which though not an offence against the English law is an<lb/>
offence against the Scotch law. <del>It is an</del> To point out the confusion<lb/>
is the only thing to the present purpose: to <add>attempt to</add> clear it up would take<lb/>
a volume.</p>
 
<note><del>the thing has no<lb/>
realm now but<lb/>
<gap/> and<lb/>
There is no realm<lb/>
now for Parliament to<lb/>
legislate upon but Great<lb/>
Britain and Ireland.<lb/>
There was then no<lb/>
realm for it but <lb/>
Great Britain</del></note>
 
<note>3. Laws <gap/><lb/>
upon names of<lb/>
things and persons<lb/>
not in N. S. Wales<lb/>
4. <gap/><lb/>
offences</note>
 
<p>Injuries purely <hi rend="underline">civil</hi> <del>are</del> <del>may</del> <add>might</add> <del>be called in the regarded</del><lb/>
<del>as comprized</del> for ought I know be <hi rend="underline">misbehaviours</hi>: but are they<lb/>
<del>in the legal sense</del> <hi rend="underline">misdemeanours?</hi> I mean in the legal sense of<lb/>
the word according to the law of England. <del><gap/></del> Take for example<lb/>
acts purely negative - the payment of debts: non-performance<lb/>
of Contracts <del>and</del> &amp;c &amp;c <add>Blackstone's at least is as decided as possible in the negative [B. IV. c. I]</add> And how <add>stands this matter</add> <del>is it as be</del> nder the law<lb/>
of Scotland?</p>
 
<p>England I take for granted - England alone was <del>never</del> looked<lb/>
to as the standard of every thing that was to be done: unto Scotland<lb/>
not so much as the mind of our legislators had ever travelled.</p>
 
<p><del>Of neither the person not so much as the mind of our legislators<lb/>
neither of them so neither of them <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> place as Scotland<lb/>
has ever travelled. What are the <gap/> of the Treasury? Yes<lb/>
but we had forgot it. Among <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></add><lb/>
<gap/> is to forget <gap/> <gap/> every thing that <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> of <gap/> <add><gap/></add> littleness <gap/> everything that belongs<lb/>
to it.</del></p>
 
<p>Offences</p>
 





Revision as of 08:27, 22 July 2016

Click Here To Edit

13 July 1802 N.S. Wales

Conduct
III. Non-existence proved
(a) 37 47
Specimens of the
Uncertainties and
deficiencies in the
previous heads in
the Act for the
establishment of the
necessary of
laws in N. S. Wales
1. This realm
2. Civil

Notes to this realm 27 G.3. c. 2

a Obliged to these words copy from the Act the words "this realm", it is impossible
for me my to avoid returning to what a degree a what little even
the inadequate scanty scrap of power undertaken to be created by it it appears been
in contemplation to by the Act is born to pieces in tatters
and rendered by these two words: a proof how
compleatly incompetent the draughtsman was to his task, and
how little of the mind of the a legislation was bestowed upon
this business, and how the slight the any inference that can be
drawn, frm what was actually done by it, to what was intended
is otherwise in contemplation to be done. This realm
what realm? What was the an offence be Under <add>Against the law of what realm</add> must an
act be an offence to be triable under the Court so constituted?
if against the law of England? of Scotland? or of Great Britain both together?
of Great Britain? If an act being an offence - not
against any law passed since the union, but only against the law of England as it stood before the
union if such an act be an offence triable in this court, so must an act
which though not an offence against the English law is an
offence against the Scotch law. It is an To point out the confusion
is the only thing to the present purpose: to attempt to clear it up would take
a volume.

the thing has no
realm now but
and
There is no realm
now for Parliament to
legislate upon but Great
Britain and Ireland.
There was then no
realm for it but
Great Britain

3. Laws
upon names of
things and persons
not in N. S. Wales
4.
offences

Injuries purely civil are may might be called in the regarded
as comprized for ought I know be misbehaviours: but are they
in the legal sense misdemeanours? I mean in the legal sense of
the word according to the law of England. Take for example
acts purely negative - the payment of debts: non-performance
of Contracts and &c &c Blackstone's at least is as decided as possible in the negative [B. IV. c. I] And how stands this matter is it as be nder the law
of Scotland?

England I take for granted - England alone was never looked
to as the standard of every thing that was to be done: unto Scotland
not so much as the mind of our legislators had ever travelled.

Of neither the person not so much as the mind of our legislators
neither of them so neither of them place as Scotland
has ever travelled. What are the of the Treasury? Yes
but we had forgot it. Among
is to forget every thing that
of littleness everything that belongs
to it.

Offences




Identifier: | JB/097/187/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 97.

Date_1

1802-07-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

37a

Box

097

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

187

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d21 / e1 / f39 / f1*

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

31571

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in