JB/139/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/139/021/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>1817 Aug. 30  3</head><lb/><head>Not Paul</head><lb/><!-- following is written in 4 narrow columns -->


<head>Ch. Paul's Style</head><lb/><head>Obscurity disproves inspiration</head><lb/>
<head>1817 Aug. 30  </head>
<head>25 or 1.</head><lb/>
<head>Not Paul</head><!-- in pencil --><lb/><!-- following is written in 4 narrow columns -->
<p>In Paul's discourses<lb/> are characters disproving<lb/> the supposition<lb/> of special commission<lb/> from God<lb/> Principal &amp; <hi rend='underline'>obscurity</hi></p>  
 
<head>26 or 2</head><lb/><p>To all persons for<lb/> whose use it is designed<lb/> the conception<lb/> conveyed by a discourse<lb/> should be clear, correct<lb/> and <sic>compleat</sic> as may be.</p>  
<head>Ch. Paul's Style</head><head>§. Obscurity disproves inspiration</head>
<head>27 or 3</head><lb/>
<head>25 or 1.</head>
<p>In Paul's discourses<lb/> are characters disproving<lb/> the supposition<lb/> of special commission<lb/> from God<lb/> Principal <unclear>&amp;</unclear> <hi rend='underline'>obscurity</hi></p>  
 
<head>26 or 2</head>
 
<p>To all persons for<lb/> whose use it is designed<lb/> the conception<lb/> conveyed by a discourse<lb/> should be clear, correct<lb/> and <sic>compleat</sic> as may be.</p>  
 
<head>27 or 3</head>
<p>Only in proportion<lb/> as it is <hi rend='underline'>understood</hi><lb/> can any good expected<lb/> from it be produced.</p>  
<p>Only in proportion<lb/> as it is <hi rend='underline'>understood</hi><lb/> can any good expected<lb/> from it be produced.</p>  
<head>28 or 4</head><lb/>  
 
<head>28 or 4</head>
<p>Evils produced in so <lb/> far as it fails of being<lb/> understood&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>Evils produced in so <lb/> far as it fails of being<lb/> understood&#x2014;<lb/>
1. Evil of<lb/>  
1. Evil of<lb/>  
2. Evil of<lb/>
2. Evil of<lb/></p>
<head>29 or 5</head><lb/> <p>Proportioned to the <lb/> practical importance<lb/> of the subject are both<lb/> these evils.</p><pb/><!-- end of 1st column -->
 
<head>Ch. Pauls Style.</head><lb/><head>(Obscurity disproves unfinished)</head><lb/><head>30 or 6</head> <lb/>
<head>29 or 5</head>
<p>Proportioned to the <lb/> practical importance<lb/> of the subject are both<lb/> these evils.</p>
 
<!-- end of 1st column -->
<head>Ch. Pauls Style.</head>
<head>§ Obscurity disproves unfinished</head>
<head>30 or 6</head>
<p>In so far as such<lb/> failure has place, the<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>means</hi> are ill adapted<lb/> to their end.</p>
<p>In so far as such<lb/> failure has place, the<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>means</hi> are ill adapted<lb/> to their end.</p>
<head>31 or 7</head><lb/>
<head>31 or 7</head>
<p>To employ means ill<lb/> adapted to the end <lb/>is to be deficient in <lb/>wisdom: if they are<lb/> known to be so and<lb/> the end known to be <lb/>good - an ordinary benevolence.<head>32 or 8</head>
<p>To employ means ill<lb/> adapted to the end <lb/>is to be deficient in <lb/>wisdom: if they are<lb/> known to be so and<lb/> the end known to be <lb/>good - an ordinary benevolence.</p>
<lb/> <p>Under such deficiencies<lb/> how can any discourses<lb/> be now believed<lb/> to be the results<lb/> of a special commission<lb/> from God?</p><head>33 or 9.</head><lb/>
<head>32 or 8</head>
<p>Objection - difficult<lb/> as are these discourses <lb/>they <sic>admitt</sic> of some <lb/>explanation: some<lb/> explanation given, <lb/>difficulty is at <del>one</del>  an <lb/>end.</p><head>34 or 10.</head>
<lb/> <p>Under such deficiencies<lb/> how can any discourses<lb/> be now believed<lb/> to be the results<lb/> of a special commission<lb/> from God?</p>
<p>Answer. (Saving conception <lb/>of which <sic>aftwds</sic>)<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>explanation</hi> is <hi rend='underline'>substitution</hi><lb/> by it the obscurity<lb/> or ambiguity<lb/> i e  the imperfection is <lb/>admitted &#x2014;</p> <pb/> <!-- end of 2nd column -->
 
<head>Ch Pauls Style.</head><lb/><head>Obscurity disproved inspiration></head><lb/><head>35 or 11</head><lb/>
<head>33 or 9.</head>
<p>Objection - difficult<lb/> as are these discourses <lb/>they <sic>admitt</sic> of some <lb/>explanation: some<lb/> explanation given, <lb/>difficulty is at <del>one</del>  an <lb/>end.</p>
 
<head>34 or 10.</head>
<p>Answer. (Saving conception <lb/>of which <sic>aftwds</sic><add><!-- note symbol --></add>)<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>explanation</hi> is <hi rend='underline'>substitution</hi><lb/> by it the obscurity<lb/> or ambiguity<lb/> i e  the imperfection is <lb/>admitted &#x2014;</p>
<!-- end of 2nd column -->
 
<head>Ch. Pauls Style.</head>
<head>§ Obscurity disproved inspiration</head>
<head>35 or 11</head>
<p><foreign>Conseditur</foreign>&#x2014; By <lb/>length of time and <lb/> change of circumstance <lb/>(i e deprivation of a<lb/> temporary explanatory<lb/> circumstance)<lb/> what was clear might <lb/>be rendered obscure<lb/> or ambiguous</p>  
<p><foreign>Conseditur</foreign>&#x2014; By <lb/>length of time and <lb/> change of circumstance <lb/>(i e deprivation of a<lb/> temporary explanatory<lb/> circumstance)<lb/> what was clear might <lb/>be rendered obscure<lb/> or ambiguous</p>  
<head>36 or 12</head><lb/>
<head>36 or 12</head>
<p>But the Vindication <lb/>applies not beyond <lb/>the particular facts <lb/>thus obscured. On the<lb/> defender it rests to<lb/> <sic>shew</sic> that by that<lb/> course not by deficiency <lb/>in ability or probity<lb/> the obscurity was <lb/> produced.</p>  
<p>But the Vindication <lb/>applies not beyond <lb/>the particular facts <lb/>thus obscured. On the<lb/> defender it rests to<lb/> <sic>shew</sic> that by that<lb/> course not by deficiency <lb/>in ability or probity<lb/> the obscurity was <lb/> produced.</p>  
<head>37 or 13</head><lb/>
 
<head>37 or 13</head>
<p>By no such supposition<lb/> can obscurity<lb/> be consistent with the <lb/> supposition of dictation<lb/> by God. Employing<lb/> means <sic>unsufficient</sic> to the end<lb/> can never be reconcilable <lb/>to the supposition <lb/> of infinite wisdom.</p>
<p>By no such supposition<lb/> can obscurity<lb/> be consistent with the <lb/> supposition of dictation<lb/> by God. Employing<lb/> means <sic>unsufficient</sic> to the end<lb/> can never be reconcilable <lb/>to the supposition <lb/> of infinite wisdom.</p>
<head>38 or 14</head><lb/>
<head>38 or 14</head>
<p><sic>Irreconcileable</sic> is the<lb/> supposition of the name<lb/> of divine wisdom <add>and</add> benevolence<lb/> <add>as</add> obscurity: <pb/><!-- end of column -->  
<p><sic>Irreconcileable</sic> is the<lb/> supposition of the name<lb/> of divine wisdom &amp; <add>and</add> benevolence<lb/> <add>as</add> obscurity: </p>
<head><sic>Pauls</sic> Style.</head><lb/>
<!-- end of column -->  
<head>38 or 14 continued</head><lb/>
<head>Ch <sic>Pauls</sic> Style.</head>
<add>it</add> is altogether <sic>favourable</sic> <lb/> to the supposition<lb/> of human <hi rend='underline'><sic>improbity</sic></hi>: i-e <hi rend='underline'>imposture</hi></p><head>39 or 15.</head><lb/>
<head>38 or 14 continued</head>
<add>it</add> is altogether <sic>favourable</sic> <lb/> to the supposition<lb/> of human <hi rend='underline'><sic>improbity</sic></hi>: i-e <hi rend='underline'>imposture</hi></p>
<head>39 or 15.</head>
<p>To a false prophet<lb/> obscurity affords an<lb/> always open refuge.<lb/> He may thus hazard<lb/> whatever affords a hope<lb/> of <del>wrong</del> <add>working</add> his dishonest<lb/> purpose, without committing<lb/> himself.</p>
<p>To a false prophet<lb/> obscurity affords an<lb/> always open refuge.<lb/> He may thus hazard<lb/> whatever affords a hope<lb/> of <del>wrong</del> <add>working</add> his dishonest<lb/> purpose, without committing<lb/> himself.</p>
<p>Of the false prophet<lb/> verbal obscurity is<lb/> the refuge, as if the<lb/> thief, real <gap/></p>
<p>Of the false prophet<lb/> verbal obscurity is<lb/> the refuge, as if the<lb/> thief, real <gap/></p>
<pb/>
 





Revision as of 10:59, 4 March 2011

Click Here To Edit


1817 Aug. 30 Not Paul

Ch. Paul's Style§. Obscurity disproves inspiration 25 or 1.

In Paul's discourses
are characters disproving
the supposition
of special commission
from God
Principal & obscurity

26 or 2

To all persons for
whose use it is designed
the conception
conveyed by a discourse
should be clear, correct
and compleat as may be.

27 or 3

Only in proportion
as it is understood
can any good expected
from it be produced.

28 or 4

Evils produced in so
far as it fails of being
understood—
1. Evil of
2. Evil of

29 or 5

Proportioned to the
practical importance
of the subject are both
these evils.

Ch. Pauls Style. § Obscurity disproves unfinished 30 or 6

In so far as such
failure has place, the
means are ill adapted
to their end.

31 or 7

To employ means ill
adapted to the end
is to be deficient in
wisdom: if they are
known to be so and
the end known to be
good - an ordinary benevolence.

32 or 8


Under such deficiencies
how can any discourses
be now believed
to be the results
of a special commission
from God?

33 or 9.

Objection - difficult
as are these discourses
they admitt of some
explanation: some
explanation given,
difficulty is at one an
end.

34 or 10.

Answer. (Saving conception
of which aftwds)
explanation is substitution
by it the obscurity
or ambiguity
i e the imperfection is
admitted —

Ch. Pauls Style. § Obscurity disproved inspiration 35 or 11

Conseditur— By
length of time and
change of circumstance
(i e deprivation of a
temporary explanatory
circumstance)
what was clear might
be rendered obscure
or ambiguous

36 or 12

But the Vindication
applies not beyond
the particular facts
thus obscured. On the
defender it rests to
shew that by that
course not by deficiency
in ability or probity
the obscurity was
produced.

37 or 13

By no such supposition
can obscurity
be consistent with the
supposition of dictation
by God. Employing
means unsufficient to the end
can never be reconcilable
to the supposition
of infinite wisdom.

38 or 14

Irreconcileable is the
supposition of the name
of divine wisdom & and benevolence
as obscurity:

Ch Pauls Style. 38 or 14 continued

it is altogether favourable
to the supposition
of human improbity: i-e imposture

39 or 15.

To a false prophet
obscurity affords an
always open refuge.
He may thus hazard
whatever affords a hope
of wrong working his dishonest
purpose, without committing
himself.

Of the false prophet
verbal obscurity is
the refuge, as if the
thief, real




Identifier: | JB/139/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 139.

Date_1

1817-08-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

25 or 1 - 39 or 15

Box

139

Main Headings

not paul but jesus

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

not paul

Image

001

Titles

ch. paul's style / obscurity disproves inspiration

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e5 / f90

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47398

Box Contents


---page break---

---page break---
-->

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in