JB/096/200/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/200/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Lidunn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Manslaughter, that is killing done in cold anger produces a mischief of the first order, which every man, were there no punishment to check it, might have reason to  apprehend much more then now that there is a punishment, from such persons (<unclear>of horror papicreto term per absents</unclear>) as falls within his acquaintance.
These persons are few in comparison  of those to whom a man would stand underposed to suffer the <unclear>late</unclear> pain, were there no punishment for <hi rend='underline'>Murder</hi>
I am speaking  now of killing done through Avarice.


From the true mischief of cash is as the matter of the <unclear>sil</unclear> of persons to that of the  other.
<p>Manslaughter, that is killing <del>in passion,</del> <add>done in sudden anger</add> <lb/>
produces a mischief of the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> order, which <lb/>
every man, were there no punishment to <lb/>
check it, might have reason to apprehend <lb/>
much more then now that there is a punishment, <lb/>
from such persons (of <del><gap/><gap/></del> <lb/>
passionate temperaments) as falls within <lb/>
his acquaintance.</p>
<p>
These persons are few in comparison of <lb/>
those to whom a man would stand exposed <lb/>
to suffer the <unclear>late</unclear> pain, were there <lb/>
no punishment for <hi rend='underline'>Murther.</hi><lb/></p>


<p>I am speaking  now of killing done through <lb/>
Avarice.</p>
<p>
<del>From</del> The total Mischief of cash is as the number <lb/>
of the one set of persons to that of the  other.<lb/></p>


It is but too true, that the whole doctrine of concluding manslaughter and murder is a <unclear>science</unclear> of the most deplorable <unclear>confession</unclear>
<p>It is but too true, that the whole doctrine <del>of</del> <lb/>
<del>Murder <gap/></del> <add>concerning</add> Manslaughter and Murder is a scene of the most deplorable <unclear>confession</unclear>.<lb/></p>


Lawyers joy on with their unreal indifference through this confusion, amidst establishments which give an equal shock to the heart and the understanding.
<p>Lawyers jog on, with their unreal indifference, <lb/>
through this confusion, amidst <lb/>
establishments which give an equal shock <add>equally shock</add><lb/> the heart and the understanding.<lb/></p>


The whole doctrine /notion of concerning killing of the particular cases of high and  
The whole doctrine <add>notion of</add> concerning killing (the <lb/>
<unclear>faulty</unclear> treason accepted is decided into murder and manslaughter. The punishments that are distributed accordingly to this division. Thus the mischief  of the offence does nothing up than levels not with this proportionment of the punishment. There are murders vastly more mischievous than murders: there are manslaughters vastly more mischievous than manslaughters:
particular cases of High and <unclear>petty</unclear> Treason <lb/>
Murder through avarice is other first by persons specially related : or second, by persons at large.
excepted) is divided into Murder and <lb/>
From murder by persons at large there is danger to a greater number. But form murder by specially related there is first greater opportunity: second greater motives. The danger of each one of these that stand exposed.  
Manslaughter. The Punishments that <add>there</add><lb/>
On the other hand there are in this either case greater restrictions than in the other: <unclear>questionable reading</unclear>affection<unclear>questionable reading</unclear>whether through blood or through simple intercourse.
<note>The <gap/> of Punishment there are for there are but two: one <add>that</add> <gap/> for the <gap/> of them: another, the lower <del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> for the second <del><gap/></del></note>are, are distributed according to this division. <lb/>
But the mischief  of the offence <lb/>
<add>does nothing less than</add> <unclear>tallies</unclear> not with this proportionment of the <lb/>
Punishment. There are murders <del>much</del> vastly more <lb/>
mischievous than Murders: there are Manslaughters <lb/>
vastly more mischievous than Manslaughters:<lb/>
<head>
MURDER &amp; MANSLAUGHTER. Duelling.</head><lb/>
<pb/>
 
<p>
Murder through avarice is either 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> By <lb/>
persons specially related: or 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> By persons <lb/>
at large.</p>
<p>
From murder by persons at large there <lb/>
is danger to a greater number. But <lb/>
from murder by persons specially related, <lb/>
the danger of each one of these that stand exposed <!-- symbol? --><lb/> is greater.<lb/>
there is 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Greater opportunity: 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi><lb/>
Greater motives. On the other hand there <lb/>
are in this latter case greater <hi rend='underline'>restrictions</hi> <lb/>
than in the other: viz: Affections: whether <lb/>through blood or through simple intercourse.<lb/></p>
 
<!-- horizontal rule -->
 
<p><del>Suppose</del> Let the danger from unpunished Manslaughter <lb/>
be such, that every man myself <lb/>
for example, have one man <del><gap/> whom</del> <add>who would</add> <lb/>
have <add>the</add> adequate motive and opportunity to <del><gap/></del> cause <lb/>
my death in this manner at some time within 40 years. For one <lb/>
man that has <add>such</add> adequate motive and opportunity <lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>during the same</add> period there would be many <lb/>
men who would have the same were Murder <lb/>
to be punished.<lb/></p>
 
<p>On this case therefore, the danger from Murder <lb/>
is some number of times greater than that <lb/>
from Manslaughter.<lb/></p>
 
<p>My life could not stand 100 years against <add>suppose for</add> <lb/>
<add>dispositions</add> <del><gap/></del>of Manslaughter: it could not stand <lb/>
<del><gap/></del> 1/4 of a year <add>perhaps</add> against dispositions <lb/>
to Murder.<lb/></p>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Let the danger from unpunished manslaughter for such, that every man might , for example, have one man who would have the adequate motive and opportunity to <unclear>questionable reading</unclear>my death in this manner at some time within 40 years. For one  man that has such adequate motive and opportunity
There are even Murders that are not mischievous: <lb/>
during the same period there would be many men who would have the same were murder to be punished.
and there are Manslaughters more mischievous than those that are.<lb/>
On this case therefore, the danger from murder is some number of times greater than that from manslaughter.
 
My life could not stand too years against impositions of manslaughter: it could not stand one-fourth of a year against dispositions to murder.
Homicide by Duelling, is homicide ensuing <lb/>
_______________________________________________
from attempts done and suffered by <hi rend='underline'>consent</hi>.<lb/>
There were murders that are not mischievous : and kind nor manslaughters more mischievous than those that are;
Every man may choose whether he will consent: <lb/>
Homicide by duelling is homicide ensuing from attempts done and suffered by consent.
every man therefore may choose whether <lb/>
Every man may choose whether he will consent: every man therefore may choose whether he will die by duelling.
he will die by Duelling.<lb/>
That of which means he may choose whether it shall come to pass or not, he is not afraid of hurdles not approached homicide by duelling , therefore as such carried with it.
 
That of which <add> a man</add> he may choose whether it shall come <lb/>
to pass or no, he is not afraid of <unclear>hurdles</unclear> not approached Homicide by Duelling therefore, as such carries with it. + <lb/>
 
<note>DUELLING. + no terror: it produceds not any Pain of Apprehension.</note>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 01:42, 7 March 2011

Click Here To Edit


Manslaughter, that is killing in passion, done in sudden anger
produces a mischief of the 1st order, which
every man, were there no punishment to
check it, might have reason to apprehend
much more then now that there is a punishment,
from such persons (of
passionate temperaments) as falls within
his acquaintance.

These persons are few in comparison of
those to whom a man would stand exposed
to suffer the late pain, were there
no punishment for Murther.

I am speaking now of killing done through
Avarice.

From The total Mischief of cash is as the number
of the one set of persons to that of the other.

It is but too true, that the whole doctrine of
Murder concerning Manslaughter and Murder is a scene of the most deplorable confession.

Lawyers jog on, with their unreal indifference,
through this confusion, amidst
establishments which give an equal shock equally shock
the heart and the understanding.

The whole doctrine notion of concerning killing (the
particular cases of High and petty Treason
excepted) is divided into Murder and
Manslaughter. The Punishments that there
The of Punishment there are for there are but two: one that for the of them: another, the lower for the second are, are distributed according to this division.
But the mischief of the offence
does nothing less than tallies not with this proportionment of the
Punishment. There are murders much vastly more
mischievous than Murders: there are Manslaughters
vastly more mischievous than Manslaughters:
MURDER & MANSLAUGHTER. Duelling.

---page break---

Murder through avarice is either 1st By
persons specially related: or 2dly By persons
at large.

From murder by persons at large there
is danger to a greater number. But
from murder by persons specially related,
the danger of each one of these that stand exposed
is greater.
there is 1st Greater opportunity: 2dly
Greater motives. On the other hand there
are in this latter case greater restrictions
than in the other: viz: Affections: whether
through blood or through simple intercourse.


Suppose Let the danger from unpunished Manslaughter
be such, that every man myself
for example, have one man whom who would
have the adequate motive and opportunity to cause
my death in this manner at some time within 40 years. For one
man that has such adequate motive and opportunity
during the same period there would be many
men who would have the same were Murder
to be punished.

On this case therefore, the danger from Murder
is some number of times greater than that
from Manslaughter.

My life could not stand 100 years against suppose for
dispositions of Manslaughter: it could not stand
1/4 of a year perhaps against dispositions
to Murder.

_______________________________________________ There are even Murders that are not mischievous:
and there are Manslaughters more mischievous than those that are.

Homicide by Duelling, is homicide ensuing
from attempts done and suffered by consent.
Every man may choose whether he will consent:
every man therefore may choose whether
he will die by Duelling.

That of which a man he may choose whether it shall come
to pass or no, he is not afraid of hurdles not approached Homicide by Duelling therefore, as such carries with it. +

DUELLING. + no terror: it produceds not any Pain of Apprehension.


Identifier: | JB/096/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

murder manslaughter duelling

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31204

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in