JB/052/075/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/075/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 31.<lb/></head>
<head>Procedure Code.<lb/></head>
 
<head>1.<lb/></head>
<p>Where Examinees in<lb/>
different judicatories<lb/>
the circumstance<lb/>
may appear to pro<lb/>
&#x2014;duce a complexity<lb/>
requiring a change<lb/>
in these provisions.<lb/></p>
 
<head>2.</head>
<p>But the complication<lb/>
not chargeable to the<lb/>
<unclear>accounts</unclear> of the provi<lb/>
&#x2014;sions here made.<lb/>
</p>
 
<head>3.</head>
<p>Under English as<lb/>
well as under any<lb/>
other system, the com<lb/>
&#x2014;plication has place<lb/></p>
 
<head>4.</head>
<p>Under English sys<lb/>
&#x2014;tem, inadequate pro<lb/>
&#x2014;vision.</p>
 
<head>5.</head>
<p>In the case of a<lb/>
party, <unclear>no mal exa</unclear><lb/>
mination.<lb/></p>
 
<head>6.</head>
<p>Epistolary examina&#x2014;<lb/>
tion applicable only<lb/>
to one party in the<lb/>
narrow circle of Equi&#x2014;<lb/>
ty procedure, and<lb/>
in no other case.<lb/></p>
 
<head>7.</head>
<p>But, if subservient<lb/>
to justice in one<lb/>
case, why not in eve<lb/>
ry case.<lb/></p>
 
<head>8.</head>
<p>Extraneous witness<lb/>
&#x2014;es examined in no<lb/>
place but before a<lb/>
Jury.<lb/></p>
 
<head>9.</head>
<p>In a proposed code,<lb/>
universal admissi<lb/>
&#x2014;on of Evidence at<lb/>
Judges's discretion.<lb/></p>
 
<head><unclear>6 II</unclear></head>
<head>Ch IV</head>
<del>Ch. IX.</del> <head>Intermediate Proceeding<unclear>s</unclear></head><lb/>
<head>S.q. Examination process.<lb/></head>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 20:22, 16 November 2016

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany 31.
Procedure Code.

1.

Where Examinees in
different judicatories
the circumstance
may appear to pro
—duce a complexity
requiring a change
in these provisions.

2.

But the complication
not chargeable to the
accounts of the provi
—sions here made.

3.

Under English as
well as under any
other system, the com
—plication has place

4.

Under English sys
—tem, inadequate pro
—vision.

5.

In the case of a
party, no mal exa
mination.

6.

Epistolary examina—
tion applicable only
to one party in the
narrow circle of Equi—
ty procedure, and
in no other case.

7.

But, if subservient
to justice in one
case, why not in eve
ry case.

8.

Extraneous witness
—es examined in no
place but before a
Jury.

9.

In a proposed code,
universal admissi
—on of Evidence at
Judges's discretion.

6 II Ch IV Ch. IX. Intermediate Proceedings
S.q. Examination process.









Identifier: | JB/052/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-9

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16748

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in