JB/002/287/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/287/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
prevention &#x2014; limitation, to a degree altogether<lb/>
prevention &#x2014; limitation, to a degree altogether<lb/>
without effect &#x2014; would be the utmost possible result<lb/>
without effect &#x2014; would be the utmost possible result<lb/>
of the most unanimous and most per<add>-severing</add><del>sever<gap/></del> opposition on this ground.
of the most unanimous and most per<add>-severing</add><del>sever<gap/></del> opposition on this ground.
</p>
</p>
<p>2. A sacrifice</p>
<p>Note comes in as p. 196</p>
<p><del>Though</del> The being <add>so perfectly</add> opposition - proof is a feature<lb/>
by which <del>distinguishes</del> the proposed mode of reduction, <add>stands distinguished</add> in a<lb/>
very striking <del>way</del><add><del>degree</del> point of view</add> from every other.  Though the  consequence<lb/>
of the <add>proposed</add> conversion were ever so clearly<lb/>
foreseen, <add>[+]</add> though it were even expressly announced  <note><add>[+]</add> by those who<lb/>
either <del>through</del><add>from</add> fact<gap/><lb/>
motives, or on the<lb/>
honest ground of <lb/>
personal interest<lb/>
were disposed to<lb/>
thwart it</note><lb/>
by government - (as <add>indeed</add> virtually it<add>could not but</add> <del>would</del> be) it<lb/>
would not be in the power even of conspiracy, so <lb/>
much as ti impede it.  By refusing <del>&amp;c</del><add>(a) as above</add> <!-- change to red ink -->as in p.3
of the copy.</p><pb/>





Revision as of 06:23, 25 December 2016

Click Here To Edit Sept. 1800
Annuity Notes 4 Abstract
Ch. XV.

Though this effect of the measure should be foreseen
- [+] though it should even be preexpressly-announced -} It is proof against

} Party effects
} on this ground

it is not in the power, even of combination comd <add>strong</add> of bination, a combination
to defeat it

Limitation only, not prevention
limitation to a degree altogether effect -
would be the utmost possible result of the most by every
[+] impressed on
every mind, and most
deeply in those
against whose machinations
it presents
an additional security
is in this view
intended as a defence
-
nous and most persevering combination that
could be found againstupon the measure in this ground.
and,(a) By refusing the paper, each conspirator would make
a compleat and certain sacrifice of his own personal advantage, without
the smallest chance of affording any possible<add>desirable</add> effectual help
to the common object of the conspiracy. — Limitation only, not
prevention — limitation, to a degree altogether
without effect — would be the utmost possible result
of the most unanimous and most per-severingsever opposition on this ground.

2. A sacrifice

Note comes in as p. 196

Though The being so perfectly opposition - proof is a feature
by which distinguishes the proposed mode of reduction, stands distinguished in a
very striking waydegree point of view from every other. Though the consequence
of the proposed conversion were ever so clearly
foreseen, [+] though it were even expressly announced [+] by those who
either throughfrom fact
motives, or on the
honest ground of
personal interest
were disposed to
thwart it

by government - (as indeed virtually itcould not but would be) it
would not be in the power even of conspiracy, so
much as ti impede it. By refusing &c(a) as above as in p.3 of the copy.


---page break---






Metadata:JB/002/287/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in