JB/038/319/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/038/319/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1826. July 4.<lb/><head>Constitutional Code.</head><lb/><p>Ch. IX. Ministers Collectively.<lb/>§. Insubordination obviated.</p><p><gap/> 2<lb/>Art 2. Object of this and<lb/>the next section,<lb/>obviating wrongs, by<lb/>functionaries, suitors, and <add>Inspectors</add><lb/>and <del><gap/></del> <add>Evidence holders</add> against<lb/>one another and the<lb/><del><gap/> and</del> state: and of<lb/>anyone against the rest.<lb/>See 55. 56.</p><p>3<lb/>Art 3. A Suitor, who.</p><p>4.<lb/>Art 4 An Inspector, who.</p><p>5.<lb/>Art 5. Examiner, or<lb/>say Evidence holder,<lb/>who.</p><p>6.<lb/>Art 6. Insubordination<lb/>what.</p><p>7.<lb/>Art 7. Quasi-insubordination,<lb/>what.</p><p>8.<lb/>Art 8. Quasi-insubordination &#x2014; <sic>it's</sic> difference<lb/>from insubordination.</p><p>9<lb/>Art <gap/> Disturbances &#x2014; In these modes</p><p>10. Ratiocinative<lb/>Art 10. From mere<lb/><hi rend="underline">inspection</hi>, as above,<lb/>no interest not<lb/>sinister, san suffer.</p><p>11<lb/>Art 11 Ratiocinative.<lb/>But for such<lb/>inspectability, by sinister<lb/>interest or intellectual<lb/>error,founders might<lb/>be led to establish<lb/>ordinances repugnant<lb/>to greatest happiness<lb/>principle, and to<lb/>actually existing<lb/>legislative ordinances.<lb/>To</p><pb/>Ch. IX. Ministers Collectively.<lb/>§. Insubordination obviated.<p>9. contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>To found an institution<lb/>and establishment with<lb/>money to carry it on is<lb/>to exercise, pro tanto, the<lb/>legislative function,<lb/>with the matter of reward<lb/>and punishment for<lb/>securing execution and<lb/>effect to it: of reward<lb/>manifestly of punishment<lb/>less manifestly, but not<lb/>less undeniably: substitution<lb/>of reward, having<lb/>pro tanto all the effect<lb/>of functionaries.</p><p>10. 10<lb/>Ratiocinative<lb/>Art 10. If under the<lb/>Constitution, from any<lb/>secretly conducted institution,<lb/>the people would<lb/>have little to fear, still<lb/>less from a regulation<lb/>for exposing to their<lb/>inspection, by means of their<lb/>functionaries all<lb/>institutions: so long as the<lb/>inspection were not<lb/>in this case accompanied<lb/>by the directive, dislocative,<lb/>or suspensive.</p><p>12.<lb/>Art 12 Disturbance etc.<lb/>which &#x2014; Quasi-insubordination<lb/>commissible by<lb/>it. Suitor Inspector or<lb/>Evidence holder</p><p>Art 13 <del>An Inspector, who</del>:<lb/>Quasi-insoburdination<lb/>commissible by an<lb/>Inspector</p><p>12.<lb/>Art 12. <del>An Evidence holder,<lb/>who:</del> Quasi-insubordination<lb/>commissible<lb/>by <del>him</del> an Evidence<lb/>holder.</p><pb/>Ch. IX. Ministers Collectively.<lb/>§. Insubordination obviated.





Revision as of 19:39, 2 January 2017

Click Here To Edit

1826. July 4.
Constitutional Code.

Ch. IX. Ministers Collectively.
§. Insubordination obviated.

2
Art 2. Object of this and
the next section,
obviating wrongs, by
functionaries, suitors, and Inspectors
and Evidence holders against
one another and the
and state: and of
anyone against the rest.
See 55. 56.

3
Art 3. A Suitor, who.

4.
Art 4 An Inspector, who.

5.
Art 5. Examiner, or
say Evidence holder,
who.

6.
Art 6. Insubordination
what.

7.
Art 7. Quasi-insubordination,
what.

8.
Art 8. Quasi-insubordination — it's difference
from insubordination.

9
Art Disturbances — In these modes

10. Ratiocinative
Art 10. From mere
inspection, as above,
no interest not
sinister, san suffer.

11
Art 11 Ratiocinative.
But for such
inspectability, by sinister
interest or intellectual
error,founders might
be led to establish
ordinances repugnant
to greatest happiness
principle, and to
actually existing
legislative ordinances.
To


---page break---
Ch. IX. Ministers Collectively.
§. Insubordination obviated.

9. contind.
To found an institution
and establishment with
money to carry it on is
to exercise, pro tanto, the
legislative function,
with the matter of reward
and punishment for
securing execution and
effect to it: of reward
manifestly of punishment
less manifestly, but not
less undeniably: substitution
of reward, having
pro tanto all the effect
of functionaries.

10. 10
Ratiocinative
Art 10. If under the
Constitution, from any
secretly conducted institution,
the people would
have little to fear, still
less from a regulation
for exposing to their
inspection, by means of their
functionaries all
institutions: so long as the
inspection were not
in this case accompanied
by the directive, dislocative,
or suspensive.

12.
Art 12 Disturbance etc.
which — Quasi-insubordination
commissible by
it. Suitor Inspector or
Evidence holder

Art 13 An Inspector, who:
Quasi-insoburdination
commissible by an
Inspector

12.
Art 12. An Evidence holder,
who:
Quasi-insubordination
commissible
by him an Evidence
holder.


---page break---
Ch. IX. Ministers Collectively.
§. Insubordination obviated.




Identifier: | JB/038/319/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38.

Date_1

1826-07-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

2-13, 1

Box

038

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

319

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

ch. ix ministers collectively / subordination obviated

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

11956

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in