JB/079/059/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/059/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
<!-- this folio is divided into quarters.  It has a margin to the left of each quarter, a footer heading, but not heading per se. -->
<p>Were the Law condensed into that Brevity ; digested into that order,
<lb/>
expressed with that precision and promulgated with that
<lb/>
notoriety of which it is susceptible, these would not be in it &#x2014;
<lb/>
wherewithal to denominate him that knew it "learned".  Every
<lb/>
man <del>at least</del> if these <add>at least</add> in comparison of whom it is any thing
<lb/>
to be denominated. "learned", would feel so much of the Theory
<lb/>
of it as concerned him within his grasp.  Within his grasp
<lb/>
either actually, as in those points for the knowledge of which the
<lb/>
call is sudden, or potentially as to those concerning which there
<lb/>
is leisure for deliberation. <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> He would have it, either <hi rend='underline'>in memory</hi> or at <hi rend='underline'>command</hi>.</note> &#x2014; Sagacious a man of Law might
<lb/>
be, prompt he might be, eloguent he might be; but "<hi rend='underline'>learned</hi>" &#x2014;
<lb/>
would be his epithet no longer, so true it is however paradoxical
<lb/>
a position , that the <del>System</del> <add><sic>Satyre</sic></add> of this Science is the eloguim
<lb/>
of <sic>it's</sic> <sic>professers</sic>.
<lb/></p>
<p>That since neither the representation of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>. Barrington, nor
<lb/>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>
 
of D<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>. Burn, nor of the Author of the Commentaries , for even
<lb/>
the Author of the Commentaries, does not seem to think except
<lb/>
in matters Ecclesiastical that every thing is "as it should be",
<lb/>
have hitherto been attended with any effect, the Legislators &#x2014;
<lb/>
which are and shall be from hence forward at least may as &#x2014;
<lb/>
much as possible be left without excuse &#x2014; I know there is &#x2014;
<lb/>
a difference between wishing that a thing were done, and &#x2014;
<lb/>
<sic>shewing</sic> in detail how it may be done, &amp; in that difference is
<lb/>
founded so much of excuse as hath hitherto been competent,
<lb/>
A portion of excuse which <unclear><gap/></unclear><!-- symbol -->. and which therefore still subsists
<lb/>
if what is here said and done shall be found to be of
<lb/>
that insignificance, which very probably it may , but which
<lb/>
he who offers it cannot be supposed consist<del>ually</del><add>ently</add> with any &#x2014;
<lb/>
due sense of his duty to the public , to attribute to it &#x2014;
<lb/>
That public is now possessed of it, &amp; will judge.
<lb/></p>
<!-- mini horizontal line centre after the last line -->
<!-- horizontal line of footer -->
<pb/>
 
<!-- horizontal line of header, right-hand upper quarter -->
 
<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>
 
<!-- horizontal line of footer, right-hand quarter -->
 
<head>Compos. Consolidation. <unclear><sic>Perorat</sic></unclear><!-- should this be Perorate ?  It would seem to make sense in the context of this heading! -->.  Former exhortations with[  ][  ]-out effect.</head>





Revision as of 03:05, 6 April 2011

Click Here To Edit


Were the Law condensed into that Brevity ; digested into that order,
expressed with that precision and promulgated with that
notoriety of which it is susceptible, these would not be in it —
wherewithal to denominate him that knew it "learned". Every
man at least if these at least in comparison of whom it is any thing
to be denominated. "learned", would feel so much of the Theory
of it as concerned him within his grasp. Within his grasp
either actually, as in those points for the knowledge of which the
call is sudden, or potentially as to those concerning which there
is leisure for deliberation. [+] [+] He would have it, either in memory or at command. — Sagacious a man of Law might
be, prompt he might be, eloguent he might be; but "learned" —
would be his epithet no longer, so true it is however paradoxical
a position , that the System Satyre of this Science is the eloguim
of it's professers.

That since neither the representation of Mr. Barrington, nor

---page break---
of Dr. Burn, nor of the Author of the Commentaries , for even
the Author of the Commentaries, does not seem to think except
in matters Ecclesiastical that every thing is "as it should be",
have hitherto been attended with any effect, the Legislators —
which are and shall be from hence forward at least may as —
much as possible be left without excuse — I know there is —
a difference between wishing that a thing were done, and —
shewing in detail how it may be done, & in that difference is
founded so much of excuse as hath hitherto been competent,
A portion of excuse which . and which therefore still subsists
if what is here said and done shall be found to be of
that insignificance, which very probably it may , but which
he who offers it cannot be supposed consistuallyently with any —
due sense of his duty to the public , to attribute to it —
That public is now possessed of it, & will judge.


---page break---



---page break---


Compos. Consolidation. Perorat. Former exhortations with[ ][ ]-out effect.




Identifier: | JB/079/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

compos. consolidation perorat. former exhortations without effect

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25501

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in