JB/087/104/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/087/104/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
"Vesting the power of displacing in different hands from the power of appointing"
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/087/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/087/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Vesting the power of displacing in different hands<lb/>from the power of appointing</head><p>This idea I take from + a very ingenious<lb/>state paper published in America. <add><del>The <unclear>use</unclear> of this arrangement is</del></add></p><p>A man's pride is <add>it is <unclear>then</unclear> <gap/></add> interested in not condemning<lb/><note><unclear>Almon's<unclear/> <unclear>Rememberancer</unclear><lb/>No 86 p. 223</note> his own <gap/> <add>Independent of affection</add>  He will therefore <add>get to be</add> be more<lb/><note>+ the title of it the original paper is <gap/><lb/>of the convention of Delegates<lb/><unclear>held</unclear> at Ipswich in the<lb/>county of Essex, who were<lb/><unclear>deputed</unclear> to take into consideration<lb/>the constitution<lb/>and form of government<lb/>proposed by the convention<lb/>of the state of Massachusetts<lb/>Bay Apr. 29 1778. republished in <unclear>Almon's</unclear><lb/><unclear>Rememberancer</unclear> No 86 p. 223.</note><lb/>backward in <unclear>displacing</unclear> the man giving ear to any<lb/>complaints against the <add>subordinate</add> person appointed than another<lb/>person would, and very probably than he ought.<lb/>This consideration will help account for <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add><unclear>whatever</unclear></add><lb/>bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical<lb/>states when great powers are given to<lb/>single persons in subordinate <unclear>stations</unclear> <unclear>without</unclear> <unclear>witness</unclear>or <gap/><lb/>other than that of the person to<lb/>whom they owe their office.  <add>But</add> the less the share<lb/>in which any one person has in the appointment<lb/>of such subordinate, the less strongly is his<lb/>pride inherited in the affair: <del>insomuch that when</del><lb/>and when the appointment by <add>in <gap/></add> the <unclear>number</unclear> of hands<lb/>it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular<lb/>election, <unclear>this</unclear> <unclear>source</unclear> of <unclear>illusion</unclear> <unclear>seems</unclear> <unclear>scarcely</unclear><lb/><unclear>to</unclear> <unclear>have</unclear> <unclear>place</unclear>.</p><p>There is a reason it is to be opined, <add>for</add> why another<lb/><add>besides</add> them the person appointing <unclear>granted</unclear> <unclear>have</unclear> <unclear>the</unclear><lb/><lb/>power of displacing, not <add><gap/></add> <unclear>why</unclear> he should have <add>it should not be <unclear>connected</unclear> <unclear>when</unclear></add></p>
<head>Vesting the power of displacing in different hands<lb/>from the power of appointing</head><p>This idea I take from + a very ingenious<lb/>state paper published in America. <add><del>The <unclear>use</unclear> of this arrangement is</del></add></p><p>A man's pride is <add>it is <unclear>then</unclear> <gap/></add> interested in not condemning<lb/><note><unclear>Almon's</unclear><unclear>Rememberancer</unclear><lb/>No 86 p. 223</note> his own <gap/> <add>Independent of affection</add>  He will therefore <add>get to be</add> be more<lb/><note>+ the title of it the original paper is <gap/><lb/>of the convention of Delegates<lb/><unclear>held</unclear> at Ipswich in the<lb/>county of Essex, who were<lb/><unclear>deputed</unclear> to take into consideration<lb/>the constitution<lb/>and form of government<lb/>proposed by the convention<lb/>of the state of Massachusetts<lb/>Bay Apr. 29 1778. republished in <unclear>Almon's</unclear><lb/><unclear>Rememberancer</unclear> No 86 p. 223.</note><lb/>backward in <unclear>displacing</unclear> the man giving ear to any<lb/>complaints against the <add>subordinate</add> person appointed than another<lb/>person would, and very probably than he ought.<lb/>This consideration will help account for <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add><unclear>whatever</unclear></add><lb/>bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical<lb/>states when great powers are given to<lb/>single persons in subordinate <unclear>stations</unclear> <unclear>without</unclear> <unclear>witness</unclear>or <gap/><lb/>other than that of the person to<lb/>whom they owe their office.  <add>But</add> the less the share<lb/>in which any one person has in the appointment<lb/>of such subordinate, the less strongly is his<lb/>pride inherited in the affair: <del>insomuch that when</del><lb/>and when the appointment by <add>in <gap/></add> the <unclear>number</unclear> of hands<lb/>it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular<lb/>election, <unclear>this</unclear> <unclear>source</unclear> of <unclear>illusion</unclear> <unclear>seems</unclear> <unclear>scarcely</unclear><lb/><unclear>to</unclear> <unclear>have</unclear> <unclear>place</unclear>.</p><p>There is a reason it is to be opined, <add>for</add> why another<lb/><add>besides</add> them the person appointing <unclear>granted</unclear> <unclear>have</unclear> <unclear>the</unclear><lb/><lb/>power of displacing, not <add><gap/></add> <unclear>why</unclear> he should have <add>it should not be <unclear>connected</unclear> <unclear>when</unclear></add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 06:50, 16 February 2017

Click Here To Edit

Vesting the power of displacing in different hands
from the power of appointing

This idea I take from + a very ingenious
state paper published in America. The use of this arrangement is

A man's pride is it is then interested in not condemning
Almon'sRememberancer
No 86 p. 223
his own Independent of affection He will therefore get to be be more
+ the title of it the original paper is
of the convention of Delegates
held at Ipswich in the
county of Essex, who were
deputed to take into consideration
the constitution
and form of government
proposed by the convention
of the state of Massachusetts
Bay Apr. 29 1778. republished in Almon's
Rememberancer No 86 p. 223.

backward in displacing the man giving ear to any
complaints against the subordinate person appointed than another
person would, and very probably than he ought.
This consideration will help account for whatever
bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical
states when great powers are given to
single persons in subordinate stations without witnessor
other than that of the person to
whom they owe their office. But the less the share
in which any one person has in the appointment
of such subordinate, the less strongly is his
pride inherited in the affair: insomuch that when
and when the appointment by in the number of hands
it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular
election, this source of illusion seems scarcely
to have place.

There is a reason it is to be opined, for why another
besides them the person appointing granted have the

power of displacing, not why he should have it should not be connected when


Identifier: | JB/087/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

104

Info in main headings field

indirect

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27629

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in