★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- this page is organised in 4 columns with a margin to the left of column 1 --> <p>1) <gap/> Narrative 18 <sic>Mar</sic> 1802<lb/> Charges against White Long Rise of Pitt <gap/></p> <!-- column 1. Points 1-5 have a line though them in pencil --> <head>1. White</head> <p>1. Refusal to prepare<lb/> contract 15 May 1799<lb/> J.B. to Long §§.5.C.12</p> <p> <add>3</add> <del>2. Refusal to deliver<lb/> Deeds 15th <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 1799</del> </p> <p> 2<lb/> 3. <add>2</add> <unclear>Forming</unclear> in clandestine<lb/> steps for obtaining<lb/> the money without the<lb/> party of J.B. that<lb/> the money might be<lb/> put into <sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> S.'s</sic> <gap/><lb/> without the lands being<lb/> clear of leases. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/> <note> [+] and without J.<lb/> B.'s knowing that<lb/> the £1000 for the<lb/> clearing away the Leases<lb/> was not comprised<lb/> in it, <gap/> whereby<lb/> J.B. was prevented<lb/> all that while from<lb/> <sic>soliciting</sic> the warrant<lb/> for the money<lb/> for himself for that<lb/ | <!-- this page is organised in 4 columns with a margin to the left of column 1 --> <p>1) <gap/> Narrative 18 <sic>Mar</sic> 1802<lb/> Charges against White Long Rise of Pitt <gap/></p> <!-- column 1. Points 1-5 have a line though them in pencil --> <head>1. White</head> <p>1. Refusal to prepare<lb/> contract 15 May 1799<lb/> J.B. to Long §§.5.C.12</p> <p> <add>3</add> <del>2. Refusal to deliver<lb/> Deeds 15th <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 1799</del> </p> <p> 2<lb/> 3. <add>2</add> <unclear>Forming</unclear> in clandestine<lb/> steps for obtaining<lb/> the money without the<lb/> party of J.B. that<lb/> the money might be<lb/> put into <sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> S.'s</sic> <gap/><lb/> without the lands being<lb/> clear of leases. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/> <note> [+] and without J.<lb/> B.'s knowing that<lb/> the £1000 for the<lb/> clearing away the Leases<lb/> was not comprised<lb/> in it, <gap/> whereby<lb/> J.B. was prevented<lb/> all that while from<lb/> <sic>soliciting</sic> the warrant<lb/> for the money<lb/> for himself for that<lb/> purpose according<lb/> to the plan offered<lb/> to and approved by<lb/> Long.</note> </p> <p> 5<lb/> 5. + <note> + long suppressed<lb/> on that occasion<lb/> <gap/> <hi rend="underline">around | ||
</hi> <gap/><lb/> sending only the<lb/> unarmed one to<lb/> <gap/></note> Wilful neglect in<lb/> not making any <gap/><lb/> from (4 <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> <lb/> day of Long's letter) to<lb/> 23 <sic>Jan</sic> 1800 day of<lb/> J.B.'s application to<lb/> him (§§.6.D.7) on<lb/> pretence of J.B.'s <lb/> never having applied<lb/> to him — <sic>tho</sic> by Long's<lb/> Letter 20 <sic>Feb.</sic> 1800)<lb/> it appears that that very<lb/> day he made his Report.</p> <p. 6. wilful refusal<lb/> to him turn the Act on<lb/> that occasion — or <gap/><lb/> J.B.</p> <p> 7.<lb/> 7. Taking upon himself<lb/> to oppose for<lb/> a frivolous reason,<lb/> the recommendation of the competent<lb/> authority (the Surveyor<lb/> General) he <lb/> being not <gap/> not <lb/> competent to judge<lb/>but having no knowledge<lb?> of the matters<lb/> of fact in which the<lb/> eligibility of the venture<lb/> depended. See how <lb/> the Act is quoted in<lb/> <add>Long's</add><lb/><!-- continues in adjacent column --> & <lb/> Long's letter to J.B. <lb/> 20 <sic>Feb.</sic> 1800. D.8.<lb/> the having no reason<lb/> to think the leases<lb/> would be bought out<lb/> for less than the £1000<lb/> <add> but</add> <lb/><!-- continues in adjacent column -->7. <lb/> but having good<lb/> reason to think the<lb/> contrary, from the<lb/> Surveyor General's<lb/> Report</p> <!-- second column --> <head>1. White <!-- illegible word overwritten --></head> <p>8<lb/> 8. Refusing to fix<lb/> any day for the leases<lb/> to quit, but<lb/> requiring the Surrenders<lb/> of the terms<lb/> to be immediate<lb/> in consequence of<lb/> which the clause<lb/> <gap/> not an edict<lb/> amounted to £12000<lb/> D.12 Wh. to J.B.<lb/> 22 <sic>Feb.</sic> 1800.</p> <p> 9<lb/> 9. <unclear>Lowdes</unclear> sending Counterparts of Leases<lb/> as desired by J.B.<lb/> for the <del>dor</del> entering<lb/> upon this treaty<lb/> he had been sent <lb/> upon according <lb/> to White's report<lb/> D.12 as above</p> <p> 10<lb/> 10. Rights obtaining<lb/> the counterparts<lb/> of the Leases previous<lb/> to the completion<lb/> of the Conveyance —<lb/> although <lb/> he <add> must have</add> <gap/> of their<lb/> existence from Estcourt<lb/> &c.</p> <!-- third column is blank --> <!-- fourth column --> <head>Lang</head> <p> 1<lb/> 1 that having entered<lb/> into the conspiracy<lb/> for defeating the establishment,<lb/> and having<lb/> entered into the<lb/> plan or conspiracy<lb?> for wasting the public<lb/> money in the <lb/> purchase of <sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic> Salisbury's<lb/> estate for the<lb/> benefit of <sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic> Salisbury<lb/> in pretence of<lb/> its being for the establishment,<lb/>he proposed<lb/> the estate to J.B.<lb/> <del> in the intent</del> pretence <lb/> of intending to apply it to that<lb/> purpose, but intending<lb/> in fact<lb/> never so to do: he<lb/> undertook the management<lb/> of the business for the express wishes — of causing <lb/> it to miscarry.</p> <p> 2<lb/> 2. Having promised<lb/> compliance with J.<lb/> B.'s application for<lb/> the Previous Contract<lb/> and having through<lb/> carelessness and for<lb/> want of seeing the <gap/><lb/> to the prejudice<lb/> of the object of<lb?> the conspiracy, obstructed<lb?> a resolution<lb?> of the Board<lb/> to that effect — and<lb/> announced it to J.<lb/> B. and written a letter<lb/> in conspiracy to White.</p> <p>3. He either gave<lb/> or was privy to<lb/> secret <del>orders</del> application<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add> without</add><lb/> and contrary to the<lb?> authority of the Board<lb/> for rendering the<lb/> direction of the Board<lb/> to White without<lb/> <unclear>issuing</unclear>.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1) Narrative 18 Mar 1802
Charges against White Long Rise of Pitt
1. White
1. Refusal to prepare
contract 15 May 1799
J.B. to Long §§.5.C.12
3 2. Refusal to deliver
Deeds 15th Novr 1799
2
3. 2 Forming in clandestine
steps for obtaining
the money without the
party of J.B. that
the money might be
put into Ld S.'s
without the lands being
clear of leases. [+]
[+] and without J.
B.'s knowing that
the £1000 for the
clearing away the Leases
was not comprised
in it, whereby
J.B. was prevented
all that while from
soliciting the warrant
for the money
for himself for that
purpose according
to the plan offered
to and approved by
Long.
5
5. + + long suppressed
on that occasion
around
sending only the
unarmed one to
Wilful neglect in
not making any
from (4 Decr
day of Long's letter) to
23 Jan 1800 day of
J.B.'s application to
him (§§.6.D.7) on
pretence of J.B.'s
never having applied
to him — tho by Long's
Letter 20 Feb. 1800)
it appears that that very
day he made his Report.
<p. 6. wilful refusal
to him turn the Act on
that occasion — or
J.B.
7.
7. Taking upon himself
to oppose for
a frivolous reason,
the recommendation of the competent
authority (the Surveyor
General) he
being not not
competent to judge
but having no knowledge<lb?> of the matters
of fact in which the
eligibility of the venture
depended. See how
the Act is quoted in
Long's
&
Long's letter to J.B.
20 Feb. 1800. D.8.
the having no reason
to think the leases
would be bought out
for less than the £1000
but
7.
but having good
reason to think the
contrary, from the
Surveyor General's
Report
1. White
8
8. Refusing to fix
any day for the leases
to quit, but
requiring the Surrenders
of the terms
to be immediate
in consequence of
which the clause
not an edict
amounted to £12000
D.12 Wh. to J.B.
22 Feb. 1800.
9
9. Lowdes sending Counterparts of Leases
as desired by J.B.
for the dor entering
upon this treaty
he had been sent
upon according
to White's report
D.12 as above
10
10. Rights obtaining
the counterparts
of the Leases previous
to the completion
of the Conveyance —
although
he must have of their
existence from Estcourt
&c.
Lang
1
1 that having entered
into the conspiracy
for defeating the establishment,
and having
entered into the
plan or conspiracy<lb?> for wasting the public
money in the
purchase of Ld Salisbury's
estate for the
benefit of Ld Salisbury
in pretence of
its being for the establishment,
he proposed
the estate to J.B.
in the intent pretence
of intending to apply it to that
purpose, but intending
in fact
never so to do: he
undertook the management
of the business for the express wishes — of causing
it to miscarry.
2
2. Having promised
compliance with J.
B.'s application for
the Previous Contract
and having through
carelessness and for
want of seeing the
to the prejudice
of the object of<lb?> the conspiracy, obstructed<lb?> a resolution<lb?> of the Board
to that effect — and
announced it to J.
B. and written a letter
in conspiracy to White.
3. He either gave
or was privy to
secret orders application
without
and contrary to the<lb?> authority of the Board
for rendering the
direction of the Board
to White without
issuing.
|
Identifier: | JB/120/071/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-03-18 |
1-10, 1-13 |
||
|
120 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
071 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::panopt. narrative charges against white long rise of […?] brouillon]] |
||
|
002 |
white / long |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
cw 1799 |
||
|
c. abbit lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
39897 |
|||
