JB/119/188/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/119/188/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TCMemoire (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/188/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/188/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<note>Reasons</note>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Panopticon Bill</head>


<p>themselves to have been forejudged in due course of law: &amp; to which<lb/>
to this moment they have never been either expressly or tacitly<lb/>
restored.</p>


<p>But secondly, not to use a plea which might be<lb/>
thought to savour of rigoud, I make this answer, which is a<lb/>
short one. Let Lord Spencer give me in any account of money<lb/>
so laid out, I will pay it at his word, in addition to the difference<lb/>
of the lime's price. No use therefore of a valuation<lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>de novo</foreign></hi> for this purpose.</p>
<p>I dont know that Lord Spencer would or would<lb/>
nor prefer a valuation <hi rend="underline"><foreign>de novo</foreign></hi> to the course I have proposed:<lb/>
but, if he did, it could only be in the hope of getting a price beyond<lb/>
what the Jury looked upon as the full price, which could<lb/>
not be done without overthrowing the verdict &amp; impeaching<lb/>
the judgment of that Jury.</p>
<p>Would such a hope have any plea to support<lb/>
it, not on the ground of strict &amp; legal justice, which is out of the<lb/>
question, but on the ground of honour, liberality, or favour? &#x2014;<lb/>
I think not. His Lordship has no claim to favour: he has <sic>shewn</sic><lb/>
none. He was offered favour, he was offered an extra price: but<lb/>
he would not listen to it: four hundred pound for prompt possession<lb/>
(to make up the £6600 even money) upwards of six per cent<lb/>
of advance, &amp; that over &amp; above whatsoever might be adjudged the<lb/>
full value: but he would neither accede to that offer nor call for<lb/>
any other. Apprized that the delay would be the loss of the<lb/>
season to the measure, he chose to abide the determination of<lb/>
Parliament. He refused favour, &amp; threw himself upon strict<lb/>
justice. Strict justice therefore &amp; no more is what he ought<lb/>
to have. <add>Were</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:38, 28 March 2017

Click Here To Edit Reasons

Panopticon Bill

themselves to have been forejudged in due course of law: & to which
to this moment they have never been either expressly or tacitly
restored.

But secondly, not to use a plea which might be
thought to savour of rigoud, I make this answer, which is a
short one. Let Lord Spencer give me in any account of money
so laid out, I will pay it at his word, in addition to the difference
of the lime's price. No use therefore of a valuation
de novo for this purpose.

I dont know that Lord Spencer would or would
nor prefer a valuation de novo to the course I have proposed:
but, if he did, it could only be in the hope of getting a price beyond
what the Jury looked upon as the full price, which could
not be done without overthrowing the verdict & impeaching
the judgment of that Jury.

Would such a hope have any plea to support
it, not on the ground of strict & legal justice, which is out of the
question, but on the ground of honour, liberality, or favour? —
I think not. His Lordship has no claim to favour: he has shewn
none. He was offered favour, he was offered an extra price: but
he would not listen to it: four hundred pound for prompt possession
(to make up the £6600 even money) upwards of six per cent
of advance, & that over & above whatsoever might be adjudged the
full value: but he would neither accede to that offer nor call for
any other. Apprized that the delay would be the loss of the
season to the measure, he chose to abide the determination of
Parliament. He refused favour, & threw himself upon strict
justice. Strict justice therefore & no more is what he ought
to have. Were



Identifier: | JB/119/188/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-9

Box

119

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

188

Info in main headings field

panopticon bill

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 /

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39699

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in