JB/002/513/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/513/002: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- This page has been struck through -->
<!-- This appears to be a rough draft, containing incomplete sentences and many abbreviations. -->
<p>I<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></p>


<p>I have to observe that the 400 in question<lb/>
being dated <add>noted</add> <add><gap/></add> in the <unclear>end</unclear> be <gap/>de of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine<lb/>
<sic>amnt</sic> is <add>operates</add> of course to be deducted from the <unclear>dybrside</unclear> <add>is the way of <unclear>distribution</unclear> of the <unclear>dybrside</unclear></add><lb/>
and accordingly as <del><gap/></del> is my <sic>amnt</sic> I have<lb/>
stated the <sic>amt</sic> of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine bill to be<lb/>
and the <sic>ballance</sic> due to be<lb/>
deducting the <sic>ballance</sic> from the <sic>amt</sic> of the<lb/>
bill it <sic>wld</sic> appear that I had <unclear>charged</unclear><lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine with being <gap/>ed only 15<unclear>s</unclear><lb/>
as I stated in my <unclear>equal</unclear> <sic>amt</sic><lb/>
<note>that the sum of 19s.<lb/>
was due to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine<lb/>
to them his <gap/> he had<lb/>
of me <add>already</add> <gap/>d per<lb/>
me <add>I <gap/>d it</add> it <sic><unclear>wld</unclear></sic> not be<lb/>
<unclear>necessary</unclear> to <unclear>relebast</unclear> the<lb/>
<del><unclear>bullion</unclear> <gap/></del> <gap/> <add><gap/> a</add> due<lb/>
from the <add><gap/></add> account of this<lb/>
bill and this <sic>wld</sic><lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<del><unclear>Icis</unclear> <unclear>have</unclear> this <unclear>same</unclear><lb/>
does not appear</del><lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine however in his<lb/>
May account <unclear>instead</unclear> of<lb/>
<unclear>charging</unclear> himself <unclear>simply</unclear><lb/>
with having <sic>recd</sic> this<lb/>
sum of<lb/>
charges himself with<lb/>
<gap/> nights <sic>amting</sic><lb/>
to 400 with this<lb/>
this sum namely to<lb/>
and notice on the <gap/><lb/>
side this 400 G bill is<lb/>
illegal Pass<gap/> in a way</note></p>
<p>I will observe that for the paper of <gap/><lb/>
how much I charged M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine with being <unclear>named</unclear><lb/>
the <sic>ballance</sic> <del><gap/></del> <unclear>chute</unclear> to be due to him with the<lb/>
<unclear>salessuted</unclear> five <del>the <gap/></del> what I <unclear>thot</unclear> to be the<lb/>
<sic>amnt</sic> of this bill</p>
<p>but as the <del><gap/></del> &amp; refusing this sum of 400<lb/>
<gap/> ballanced <add><gap/> its in <gap/></add> the receipt of so much <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> I <sic>thght</sic><lb/>
<del>did not operate</del> it <sic>wld</sic> only <unclear>compare</unclear> my <sic>amt</sic><lb/>
to notice it <del>and</del> &amp; therefore passed it by as a<lb/>
private transaction which did not at all influence<lb/>
the general <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> of my <sic>accnts</sic> and which rather<lb/>
on M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Paine <sic>accnt</sic> I <del>wished</del> hoped not to have<lb/>
<unclear>among</unclear> to</p>
<p><unclear>who it</unclear> standing as it does on the <gap/> side not<lb/>
simply <sic>counterballance</sic> has an</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:06, 9 April 2017

Click Here To Edit

I

I have to observe that the 400 in question
being dated noted in the end be de of Mr Paine
amnt is operates of course to be deducted from the dybrside is the way of distribution of the dybrside
and accordingly as is my amnt I have
stated the amt of Mr Paine bill to be
and the ballance due to be
deducting the ballance from the amt of the
bill it wld appear that I had charged
Mr Paine with being ed only 15s
as I stated in my equal amt
that the sum of 19s.
was due to Mr Paine
to them his he had
of me already d per
me I d it it wld not be
necessary to relebast the
bullion a due
from the account of this
bill and this wld

Icis have this same
does not appear

Mr Paine however in his
May account instead of
charging himself simply
with having recd this
sum of
charges himself with
nights amting
to 400 with this
this sum namely to
and notice on the
side this 400 G bill is
illegal Pass in a way

I will observe that for the paper of
how much I charged Mr Paine with being named
the ballance chute to be due to him with the
salessuted five the what I thot to be the
amnt of this bill

but as the & refusing this sum of 400
ballanced its in the receipt of so much I thght
did not operate it wld only compare my amt
to notice it and & therefore passed it by as a
private transaction which did not at all influence
the general of my accnts and which rather
on Mr Paine accnt I wished hoped not to have
among to

who it standing as it does on the side not
simply counterballance has an



Identifier: | JB/002/513/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

513

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F12

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

1796

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1796

Notes public

ID Number

1252

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in