JB/014/011/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/014/011/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
high is more a mode of proof as those which Logic
and Geometry afford &#x2014; Why? because Logic
and Geometry to him who will bestow attention
enough, will with respect to all
matters that are within their competency
afford in all instances perfect satisfaction
Human testimony will also in some of the instances
that are within it's competence afford the same perfect satisfaction
the same quiescent feel of the mind; in other cases however,
I should say Geometry
rather: for &#x2014;
Logic teaches in truth informs men
nothing but what
they know already.
a determination less steady, a satisfaction less
perfect, and in others again none at all.
Are they then susceptible of Demonstration?
Locke has said they are &#x2014; It is he saud
true &#x2014; to know this, one must understand
what Demonstration is, we must satisfy <gap/>
ourselves clearly what we mean by Demonstration:
we must examistic the foundation of that
assurance, that satisfaction we find ourselves able to obtain concerning
the truth of those propositions which are
said to be demonstrated to us in Mathematics
 
 





Revision as of 09:33, 23 April 2017

Click Here To Edit

high is more a mode of proof as those which Logic and Geometry afford — Why? because Logic and Geometry to him who will bestow attention enough, will with respect to all matters that are within their competency afford in all instances perfect satisfaction Human testimony will also in some of the instances that are within it's competence afford the same perfect satisfaction the same quiescent feel of the mind; in other cases however, I should say Geometry rather: for — Logic teaches in truth informs men nothing but what they know already. a determination less steady, a satisfaction less perfect, and in others again none at all. Are they then susceptible of Demonstration? Locke has said they are — It is he saud true — to know this, one must understand what Demonstration is, we must satisfy ourselves clearly what we mean by Demonstration: we must examistic the foundation of that assurance, that satisfaction we find ourselves able to obtain concerning the truth of those propositions which are said to be demonstrated to us in Mathematics





Identifier: | JB/014/011/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

011

Info in main headings field

introduction jurisprudence &c how far susceptible of demonstration

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4774

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in