★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
10<lb/>C 1<p><note>17<lb/>Names by which the<lb/>principle has been<lb/>designated, in many<lb/>points inappropriate.</note><lb/>To the diffusion of the system on the reception & adopt<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>the maximum of happiness in the whole human species not to mention<lb/>others <add>is</add> so inseparably and incontroverti<add>a</add>bly dependent, it happens, <add>rather</add><lb/>unfortunately, that the <del>several</del> denomination, by which, at different<lb/>times, it came to be designated <del>were</del> was in many points so<lb/>far from being an apt one.</p><p><note>18.<lb/>Prin. of ut<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> <gap/><lb/>expressiveness of the<lb/>term</note><lb/>At first, the name was the <hi rend="underline">principle of utility</hi>. here the fault<lb/>was that, by the expression thus employed, not the idea meant<lb/>to be conveyed but one widely different from it was in fact<lb/>at all times <hi rend="underline">liable</hi> to be conveyed, and to an inconsiderable<lb/>extent actually conveyed: and of this mistake<del>n</del> <del>a</del> <add>in discourse one</add> bad a practice<lb/>was the <del>causing that</del> drawing down to a correspondent extent<lb/>the sentiment of disapprobation upon the opinion in the reception<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> all the good that c<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be produced by the disseminat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the<lb/>principle depended.</p><p><note>19.<lb/>The word regarded as<lb/>calling for approbat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>of every measure<lb/>contributing to an<lb/>end whatever that<lb/>end be.</note><lb/>To the extent in question, the principle of utility, was, in a word<lb/>regarded, as above, (look at the anterior passage referred to) by<lb/>wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> approbation was called for by every opinion or operation by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>a contribution was made to this or that end, whatsoever might<lb/>be the nature of that end: the _____ of it, being regarded as<lb/>the principe by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> approbation is called for, for such measures<lb/><del>also</del> <add>alone</add> as are contributory to human happiness taken in the aggregate,<lb/>fixed the maximum of the happiness enjoyed by the<lb/>aggregate composed of the several members of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> the in<lb/>question is composed.</p><p><note>20.<lb/></note></p> | 10<lb/>C 1<p><note>17<lb/>Names by which the<lb/>principle has been<lb/>designated, in many<lb/>points inappropriate.</note><lb/>To the diffusion of the system on the reception & adopt<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>the maximum of happiness in the whole human species not to mention<lb/>others <add>is</add> so inseparably and incontroverti<add>a</add>bly dependent, it happens, <add>rather</add><lb/>unfortunately, that the <del>several</del> denomination, by which, at different<lb/>times, it came to be designated <del>were</del> was in many points so<lb/>far from being an apt one.</p><p><note>18.<lb/>Prin. of ut<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> <gap/><lb/>expressiveness of the<lb/>term</note><lb/>At first, the name was the <hi rend="underline">principle of utility</hi>. here the fault<lb/>was that, by the expression thus employed, not the idea meant<lb/>to be conveyed but one widely different from it was in fact<lb/>at all times <hi rend="underline">liable</hi> to be conveyed, and to an inconsiderable<lb/>extent actually conveyed: and of this mistake<del>n</del> <del>a</del> <add>in discourse one</add> bad a practice<lb/>was the <del>causing that</del> drawing down to a correspondent extent<lb/>the sentiment of disapprobation upon the opinion in the reception<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> all the good that c<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be produced by the disseminat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the<lb/>principle depended.</p><p><note>19.<lb/>The word regarded as<lb/>calling for approbat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>of every measure<lb/>contributing to an<lb/>end whatever that<lb/>end be.</note><lb/>To the extent in question, the principle of utility, was, in a word<lb/>regarded, as above, (look at the anterior passage referred to) by<lb/>wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> approbation was called for by every opinion or operation by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>a contribution was made to this or that end, whatsoever might<lb/>be the nature of that end: the _____ of it, being regarded as<lb/>the principe by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> approbation is called for, for such measures<lb/><del>also</del> <add>alone</add> as are contributory to human happiness taken in the aggregate,<lb/>fixed the maximum of the happiness enjoyed by the<lb/>aggregate composed of the several members of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> the in<lb/>question is composed.</p><p><note>20.<lb/>Consequence of the<lb/>mistake -- disapprobat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>supposed to<lb/>be called for to the<lb/>pursuit of pleasure.</note><lb/>Of this mistake one consequence was that of its being a<lb/>principle by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> disapprobation was called for th the pursuit of<lb/>pleas<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, to every action by means of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> pleas<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> was either at<lb/>the moment produced, or a probability of _____ it at a future<lb/>time produced: whereas in the intent<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the originator of it, if<lb/>such he may be <sic>stiled</sic>. the same sentient of approbat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> is<lb/>called for every action without distinct<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> pleas<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> in any<lb/>shape, at the moment or any subsequent moment is produced,<lb/>such opportunity being given on the single condition that by<lb/>such action, pain or loss of pleas<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> to a greater amount<lb/>be not produced. Thus on every occasion, happiness is in<lb/>his view of considering it a subject matter of account &<lb/>calculation, of profit endless, _____ many itself is —<lb/>that <gap/> matter which had for the happiness wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>it is contributory to the production of w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be altogether<lb/>valueless.</p><p><note>21.<lb/>Substitut<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the<lb/>name of <hi rend="underline">gr<add>t.</add> happ.</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">prin.</hi> to that of prin.<lb/>of ut<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></note><lb/>It was not till within these few years, in consequence of<lb/>closer & closer and ever important scrutiny to wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> <del><gap/></del> mankind<lb/>has <add>is</add> been indebted for his discoveries <del>w</del> that Mr. Bentham <del><gap/></del><lb/>arrived at last at the perception that in the same phrase<lb/>the grea<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi> of y<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> number tastes a source of<lb/>misconception. The _____ certain were lost in <del><gap/></del><lb/>communication of it to all such persons whose situat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> happened to</p> | ||
10
C 1
17
Names by which the
principle has been
designated, in many
points inappropriate.
To the diffusion of the system on the reception & adoptn. of whh.
the maximum of happiness in the whole human species not to mention
others is so inseparably and incontrovertiably dependent, it happens, rather
unfortunately, that the several denomination, by which, at different
times, it came to be designated were was in many points so
far from being an apt one.
18.
Prin. of uty.
expressiveness of the
term
At first, the name was the principle of utility. here the fault
was that, by the expression thus employed, not the idea meant
to be conveyed but one widely different from it was in fact
at all times liable to be conveyed, and to an inconsiderable
extent actually conveyed: and of this mistaken a in discourse one bad a practice
was the causing that drawing down to a correspondent extent
the sentiment of disapprobation upon the opinion in the reception
of whh. all the good that cd. be produced by the disseminatn. of the
principle depended.
19.
The word regarded as
calling for approbatn.
of every measure
contributing to an
end whatever that
end be.
To the extent in question, the principle of utility, was, in a word
regarded, as above, (look at the anterior passage referred to) by
whh. approbation was called for by every opinion or operation by whh.
a contribution was made to this or that end, whatsoever might
be the nature of that end: the _____ of it, being regarded as
the principe by whh. approbation is called for, for such measures
also alone as are contributory to human happiness taken in the aggregate,
fixed the maximum of the happiness enjoyed by the
aggregate composed of the several members of whh. the in
question is composed.
20.
Consequence of the
mistake -- disapprobatn.
supposed to
be called for to the
pursuit of pleasure.
Of this mistake one consequence was that of its being a
principle by whh. disapprobation was called for th the pursuit of
please., to every action by means of whh. please. was either at
the moment produced, or a probability of _____ it at a future
time produced: whereas in the intentn. of the originator of it, if
such he may be stiled. the same sentient of approbatn. is
called for every action without distinctn. of whh. please. in any
shape, at the moment or any subsequent moment is produced,
such opportunity being given on the single condition that by
such action, pain or loss of please. to a greater amount
be not produced. Thus on every occasion, happiness is in
his view of considering it a subject matter of account &
calculation, of profit endless, _____ many itself is —
that matter which had for the happiness whh.
it is contributory to the production of wd. be altogether
valueless.
21.
Substitutn. of the
name of grt. happ.
prin. to that of prin.
of uty.
It was not till within these few years, in consequence of
closer & closer and ever important scrutiny to whh. mankind
has is been indebted for his discoveries w that Mr. Bentham
arrived at last at the perception that in the same phrase
the great. happs. of ye. greatt. number tastes a source of
misconception. The _____ certain were lost in
communication of it to all such persons whose situatn. happened to
Identifier: | JB/014/367/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
17-21 |
|||
014 |
deontology |
||
367 |
|||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
f10 |
||
john flowerdew colls |
b&m 1829 |
||
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
1829 |
|||
5130 |
|||