JB/014/376/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/376/001: Difference between revisions

Jgregor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jgregor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
<note>40.<lb/>Seeing the inaptitude of<lb/>these composite appellatives<lb/>JB gave <hi rend="underline">Brithibernia</hi>,<lb/>which presents no such<lb/>idea of repugnance<lb/>as Brit<hi rend="superscript">h</hi>. &amp; Irish. The<lb/>signs of the things<lb/>signified being melted<lb/>into one, might<lb/>have served as a<lb/>cement.</note>
<note>40.<lb/>Seeing the inaptitude of<lb/>these composite appellatives<lb/>JB gave <hi rend="underline">Brithibernia</hi>,<lb/>which presents no such<lb/>idea of repugnance<lb/>as Brit<hi rend="superscript">h</hi>. &amp; Irish. The<lb/>signs of the things<lb/>signified being melted<lb/>into one, might<lb/>have served as a<lb/>cement.</note>


Mindful of this inaptitude on the<lb/>
part of the composite appellatives thus employed,<lb/>
and not incapable of observing, in the <unclear>worst</unclear> of<lb/>
the logical disorder <sic>it's</sic> political evil consequences,<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Bentham sets his mind on the inquiry<lb/>
after a remedy, and the appellative <hi rend="underline">Brithibernia</hi>,<lb/>
instead of British and Irish, being added, no such<lb/>
idea as that of <hi rend="underline">repugnance</hi>, and consequent consideration which, by the locution British and Irish,<lb/>
is so unhappily forced upon the mind,


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:53, 8 June 2017

Click Here To Edit

1829. June Article on Utilitarianism

G4
4

Irish religion - when these locutions are brought
to view, correspondent to the difficulty of bringing
into union the things signified, was found the difficulty
of bringing into the like state these same
signs of them. British interests being one sort of
thing, Irish interests were found, or thought, or said
to be another and very different sort of thing : and
so in regard to affections, religion, and but too many
other subject matters of thought, action and discourse
that might be named.

40.
Seeing the inaptitude of
these composite appellatives
JB gave Brithibernia,
which presents no such
idea of repugnance
as Brith. & Irish. The
signs of the things
signified being melted
into one, might
have served as a
cement.

Mindful of this inaptitude on the
part of the composite appellatives thus employed,
and not incapable of observing, in the worst of
the logical disorder it's political evil consequences,
Mr. Bentham sets his mind on the inquiry
after a remedy, and the appellative Brithibernia,
instead of British and Irish, being added, no such
idea as that of repugnance, and consequent consideration which, by the locution British and Irish,
is so unhappily forced upon the mind,



Identifier: | JB/014/376/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

40

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

376

Info in main headings field

article on utilitarianism

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4 / f19

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

john flowerdew colls

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5139

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in