★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1829. June 6, 7. H 2<lb/><head>Article on Utilitarianism.</head> (2 22(3<p>employed by him for the | 1829. June 6, 7. H 2<lb/><head>Article on Utilitarianism.</head> (2 22(3<p>employed by him for the designat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of that branch of the <hi rend="underline">ipse<lb/>dixit</hi> princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> applies to the civil or say non-penal branch<lb/>of law includ<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> every port<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> not comprised within the denominat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>of the penal: the civil or say non-penal over wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> in his<lb/>view <add>system</add> of the matter we shall <add>have found</add> find presiding the<lb/>non-disappointm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> principle.</p><p><note>45.<lb/>Virtue & vice: one<lb/>conduces to happiness, the<lb/>other to unhappiness;<lb/>adjunct to virtue,<lb/>self-denial ie sacrifice<lb/>of present good to<lb/>supposed d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> such sacrifice<lb/>scarcely ever made:<lb/>ex. pleasure of sense<lb/>in general.</note><lb/>To return to virtue & vice. By virtue under the direct<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>of the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> is understood that line of<lb/>conduct & correspondent disposit<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> is conducive to<lb/>happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> In the case of the virtue one <add>addit<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi></add> adjunct, however,<lb/>& that productive of a limitative effect requires to<lb/>be made; thus is that of the sort of action denominated<lb/>virtuous the exercise required more or less of<lb/>self-denial: that is to say of a sacrifice made of the present<lb/>good whether pleas<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> or exempt<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> from pain to some<lb/>greater good to come. For keeping the posit<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> in quest<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>within the pale of truth this limitative adjunct is<lb/>altogether indispensable. For see now whether it<lb/>be not so. Among the act<hi rend="superscript">ns.</hi> <add>by</add> the exercise of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> the<lb/>existence of the individual is continued and among them,<lb/>of those by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> pleas<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> is experienced or pain reverted<lb/>& excluded small is the is the proport<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of those by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>virtue in any shape can with propriety be said to<lb/>be exercised. Why? Because in the exercise made<lb/>of them no self-denial no sacrifice of the present<lb/>to the future good is <add>performed</add> made. Thus it is for example<lb/>with the pleas<hi rend="superscript">es.</hi> of sense in gene<hi rend="superscript">l.</hi>.</p><p><note>46.<lb/>But if a man has his<lb/>desires so under control<lb/>that the sacrifice causes<lb/>no uneasiness, will you<lb/>say his virtue is on a<lb/>lower level in his<lb/>mental frame<lb/>because this is no<lb/>self-denial?</note><lb/>But, here comes in an object<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>. Suppose a man to have<lb/>his appetites & desires of all sorts in such <add>complete</add> subject<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> that,<lb/>in the sacrifice of the lesser present to the greater future<lb/>good, no uneasiness is experienced: nothing that can<lb/>be called <hi rend="underline">self-denial</hi> is practised. Of such a man will<lb/>you say, that in his mental frame virtue is on a<lb/>lower level in the scale of perfect<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>, than in the<lb/>case of one in whom the contest between the lesser<lb/>present & greater future good, or, according to Dean<lb/>Swift's emblem, the game of leap frog between<lb/>flesh & spirit is continually renewed? No<lb/>assuredly. But, for this not less true it is that to the<lb/>applying with propriety to a man's <hi rend="underline">habit</hi> & <hi rend="underline">disposit<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>the appellatives virtue and virtuous the supposit<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>of the existence of reluctance & <hi rend="underline">self-denial</hi> in the character<lb/>of an accompanim<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> of or ingredient in the habit is<lb/>indispensable: at the time in question no such unpleasant<lb/>sensation has place: but at some anterior point of time it<lb/>had place: only in the intervening space of time it has<lb/>been gradually worn away, as a file is smoothed down<lb/>by usage. [<gap/> J. B. substitute a better emblem.]</p> | ||
1829. June 6, 7. H 2
Article on Utilitarianism. (2 22(3
employed by him for the designatn. of that branch of the ipse
dixit prince. whh. applies to the civil or say non-penal branch
of law includg. every portn. not comprised within the denominatn.
of the penal: the civil or say non-penal over whh. in his
view system of the matter we shall have found find presiding the
non-disappointmt. principle.
45.
Virtue & vice: one
conduces to happiness, the
other to unhappiness;
adjunct to virtue,
self-denial ie sacrifice
of present good to
supposed do. such sacrifice
scarcely ever made:
ex. pleasure of sense
in general.
To return to virtue & vice. By virtue under the directn.
of the greatt. happss. prine. is understood that line of
conduct & correspondent dispositn. whh. is conducive to
happss. In the case of the virtue one additn. adjunct, however,
& that productive of a limitative effect requires to
be made; thus is that of the sort of action denominated
virtuous the exercise required more or less of
self-denial: that is to say of a sacrifice made of the present
good whether please. or exemptn. from pain to some
greater good to come. For keeping the positn. in questn.
within the pale of truth this limitative adjunct is
altogether indispensable. For see now whether it
be not so. Among the actns. by the exercise of whh. the
existence of the individual is continued and among them,
of those by whh. please. is experienced or pain reverted
& excluded small is the is the proportn. of those by whh.
virtue in any shape can with propriety be said to
be exercised. Why? Because in the exercise made
of them no self-denial no sacrifice of the present
to the future good is performed made. Thus it is for example
with the pleases. of sense in genel..
46.
But if a man has his
desires so under control
that the sacrifice causes
no uneasiness, will you
say his virtue is on a
lower level in his
mental frame
because this is no
self-denial?
But, here comes in an objectn.. Suppose a man to have
his appetites & desires of all sorts in such complete subjectn. that,
in the sacrifice of the lesser present to the greater future
good, no uneasiness is experienced: nothing that can
be called self-denial is practised. Of such a man will
you say, that in his mental frame virtue is on a
lower level in the scale of perfectn., than in the
case of one in whom the contest between the lesser
present & greater future good, or, according to Dean
Swift's emblem, the game of leap frog between
flesh & spirit is continually renewed? No
assuredly. But, for this not less true it is that to the
applying with propriety to a man's habit & disposit<hi rend="superscript">n.
the appellatives virtue and virtuous the suppositn.
of the existence of reluctance & self-denial in the character
of an accompanimt. of or ingredient in the habit is
indispensable: at the time in question no such unpleasant
sensation has place: but at some anterior point of time it
had place: only in the intervening space of time it has
been gradually worn away, as a file is smoothed down
by usage. [ J. B. substitute a better emblem.]
Identifier: | JB/014/379/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-06-06 |
45-46 |
||
014 |
deontology |
||
379 |
article on utilitarianism |
||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 / f22 |
||
john flowerdew colls |
|||
5142 |
|||