JB/014/382/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/382/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1829. June 7. I 2 25<lb/><head>Art. in West. Rev. (Utilitarianism.)</head><p><note>50.<lb/>In employing 2 assumptions<lb/>1. that it is the general<lb/>rule of action laid down<lb/>by competent authority.<lb/>2. that whatever is<lb/>meant by rectitude &<lb/>propriety this rule is<lb/>a proper one: take<lb/>any maxim of justice<lb/>& apply it so that justice<lb/>will be done. It will<lb/>be found that <add>a</add> dictate<lb/>of <del>justice is</del> greatest<lb/>happiness principle<lb/>is same as d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of justice.</note><lb/>In &amp; by the employm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> given to the word justice two<lb/>assumpt<hi rend="superscript">ns.</hi> are <add>implicitly</add> impliedly contained: ass<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> 1. that by compet<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> author<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> the<lb/>general rule of act<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> has been laid down: ass<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> 2. that <sic>whatsever</sic><lb/>be meant by rectitude &amp; propriety this rule is itself reference had<lb/>to the situat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> in wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> it is thus placed &#x2014; a right &amp; proper one. Now then take<lb/>for exemplificat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> &amp; explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>'s sake any one of the rules of detail brought to<lb/>view in the charac<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> of rules or maxims of justice: rules by the observance<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> justice will be done &#x2014; rules by the non-observance of<lb/>wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> justice will be violated or in other words injustice will<lb/>be done. If then so it be that the rule thus exhibited in the<lb/>character of a maxim or dictate of justice is the same wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>on this same occas<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be found to be a dictate or say<lb/>precept emanating fr<hi rend="superscript">m.</hi> the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, then thus<lb/>far are the notions of the author of the rule in a state of<lb/>conformity &amp; due subordinat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> with reference to the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>: &amp; the dictate or say precept thus deduced<lb/>on the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> may be said to be a<lb/>dictate of justice in consid<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the determinateness of the form<lb/>of words by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> it stands expressed.</p>





Revision as of 19:08, 13 June 2017

Click Here To Edit

1829. June 7. I 2 25
Art. in West. Rev. (Utilitarianism.)

50.
In employing 2 assumptions
1. that it is the general
rule of action laid down
by competent authority.
2. that whatever is
meant by rectitude &
propriety this rule is
a proper one: take
any maxim of justice
& apply it so that justice
will be done. It will
be found that a dictate
of justice is greatest
happiness principle
is same as do. of justice.

In & by the employmt. given to the word justice two
assumptns. are implicitly impliedly contained: assn. 1. that by compett. authory. the
general rule of actn. has been laid down: assn. 2. that whatsever
be meant by rectitude & propriety this rule is itself reference had
to the situatn. in whh. it is thus placed — a right & proper one. Now then take
for exemplificatn. & explanatn.'s sake any one of the rules of detail brought to
view in the characr. of rules or maxims of justice: rules by the observance
of whh. justice will be done — rules by the non-observance of
whh. justice will be violated or in other words injustice will
be done. If then so it be that the rule thus exhibited in the
character of a maxim or dictate of justice is the same whh.
on this same occasn. wd. be found to be a dictate or say
precept emanating frm. the greatt. happss. prine., then thus
far are the notions of the author of the rule in a state of
conformity & due subordinatn. with reference to the greatt.
happss. prine.: & the dictate or say precept thus deduced
on the greatt. happss. prine. may be said to be a
dictate of justice in considn. of the determinateness of the form
of words by whh. it stands expressed.




Identifier: | JB/014/382/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

50-52

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

382

Info in main headings field

art. in west. rev. (utilitarianism)

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

john flowerdew colls

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5145

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in