JB/014/382/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/382/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1829. June 7. I 2 25<lb/><head>Art. in West. Rev. (Utilitarianism.)</head><p><note>50.<lb/>In employing 2 assumptions<lb/>1. that it is the general<lb/>rule of action laid down<lb/>by competent authority.<lb/>2. that whatever is<lb/>meant by rectitude &<lb/>propriety this rule is<lb/>a proper one: take<lb/>any maxim of justice<lb/>& apply it so that justice<lb/>will be done. It will<lb/>be found that <add>a</add> dictate<lb/>of <del>justice is</del> greatest<lb/>happiness principle<lb/>is same as d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of justice.</note><lb/>In &amp; by the employm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> given to the word justice two<lb/>assumpt<hi rend="superscript">ns.</hi> are <add>implicitly</add> impliedly contained: ass<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> 1. that by compet<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> author<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> the<lb/>general rule of act<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> has been laid down: ass<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> 2. that <sic>whatsever</sic><lb/>be meant by rectitude &amp; propriety this rule is itself reference had<lb/>to the situat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> in wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> it is thus placed &#x2014; a right &amp; proper one. Now then take<lb/>for exemplificat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> &amp; explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>'s sake any one of the rules of detail brought to<lb/>view in the charac<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> of rules or maxims of justice: rules by the observance<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> justice will be done &#x2014; rules by the non-observance of<lb/>wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> justice will be violated or in other words injustice will<lb/>be done. If then so it be that the rule thus exhibited in the<lb/>character of a maxim or dictate of justice is the same wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>on this same occas<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be found to be a dictate or say<lb/>precept emanating fr<hi rend="superscript">m.</hi> the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, then thus<lb/>far are the notions of the author of the rule in a state of<lb/>conformity &amp; due subordinat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> with reference to the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>: &amp; the dictate or say precept thus deduced<lb/>on the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> may be said to be a<lb/>dictate of justice in consid<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the determinateness of the form<lb/>of words by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> it stands expressed.</p><p><note>51.<lb/>To have a clear idea<lb/>of it justice must be<lb/>divided into civil &<lb/>penal.</note><lb/>Vague, obscure &amp; little satisfactory as the incomplete<lb/>explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the word justice must as yet be<lb/>confessed to be this is all that can yet be done towards<lb/>rendering the import attached to it clear &amp; determinate.<lb/>Before the concep<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> conveyed by it can be clear &amp;<lb/>adequate a divis<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of its import must be <add>brought to view</add> made. A<lb/>divis<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> has been made by the hand of custom &amp;<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> the words civil &amp; penal have been made<lb/>the instrum<hi rend="superscript">ts.</hi></p><p><note>52.<lb/>All-important principle<lb/>in civil justice<lb/>according to J. B. is the<lb/>non-disappointment<lb/>principle -- See Review<lb/>of Humphreys.</note><lb/>According to Mr. Bentham the one all-comprehensive<lb/>rule of civil justice applicable to the<lb/>purpose of giving import &amp; express<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> to all arrangem<hi rend="superscript">ts.</hi><lb/>hav<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> for their subject matters the subj<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> matt<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi> of proprietaty<lb/>rights in all their <add>several</add> shapes or still more<lb/>generally all objects of general desire &amp; seats of<lb/>value is that wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> he has termed the non-disappointm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>or say disapp<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi>-prevent<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> a princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> some<lb/>further explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> herein <add>below</add> above, as also in the art.<lb/>on Mr. Humphreys' work on Real Prop<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> intro<lb/>of this Rev<hi rend="superscript">w.</hi> not that without some modificat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>received from two other sources this subordinate prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> can<lb/>consistently with the dictates of its superordinate the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> principle be employed to determine the expres<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi><lb/> given to all the arrangem<hi rend="superscript">ts.</hi> belong<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> to this branch of<lb/>the all-comprehensive rule of act<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>: but to make any<lb/>further advance into this field w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be to <gap/><lb/>too widely from the track properly belong<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> to this art<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> so</p>
1829. June 7. I 2 25<lb/><head>Art. in West. Rev. (Utilitarianism.)</head><p><note>50.<lb/>In employing 2 assumptions<lb/>1. that it is the general<lb/>rule of action laid down<lb/>by competent authority.<lb/>2. that whatever is<lb/>meant by rectitude &<lb/>propriety this rule is<lb/>a proper one: take<lb/>any maxim of justice<lb/>& apply it so that justice<lb/>will be done. It will<lb/>be found that <add>a</add> dictate<lb/>of <del>justice is</del> greatest<lb/>happiness principle<lb/>is same as d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of justice.</note><lb/>In &amp; by the employm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> given to the word justice two<lb/>assumpt<hi rend="superscript">ns.</hi> are <add>implicitly</add> impliedly contained: ass<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> 1. that by compet<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> author<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> the<lb/>general rule of act<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> has been laid down: ass<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> 2. that <sic>whatsever</sic><lb/>be meant by rectitude &amp; propriety this rule is itself reference had<lb/>to the situat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> in wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> it is thus placed &#x2014; a right &amp; proper one. Now then take<lb/>for exemplificat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> &amp; explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>'s sake any one of the rules of detail brought to<lb/>view in the charac<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> of rules or maxims of justice: rules by the observance<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> justice will be done &#x2014; rules by the non-observance of<lb/>wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> justice will be violated or in other words injustice will<lb/>be done. If then so it be that the rule thus exhibited in the<lb/>character of a maxim or dictate of justice is the same wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>on this same occas<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be found to be a dictate or say<lb/>precept emanating fr<hi rend="superscript">m.</hi> the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, then thus<lb/>far are the notions of the author of the rule in a state of<lb/>conformity &amp; due subordinat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> with reference to the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>: &amp; the dictate or say precept thus deduced<lb/>on the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> may be said to be a<lb/>dictate of justice in consid<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the determinateness of the form<lb/>of words by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> it stands expressed.</p><p><note>51.<lb/>To have a clear idea<lb/>of it justice must be<lb/>divided into civil &<lb/>penal.</note><lb/>Vague, obscure &amp; little satisfactory as the incomplete<lb/>explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the word justice must as yet be<lb/>confessed to be this is all that can yet be done towards<lb/>rendering the import attached to it clear &amp; determinate.<lb/>Before the concep<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> conveyed by it can be clear &amp;<lb/>adequate a divis<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of its import must be <add>brought to view</add> made. A<lb/>divis<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> has been made by the hand of custom &amp;<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> the words civil &amp; penal have been made<lb/>the instrum<hi rend="superscript">ts.</hi></p><p><note>52.<lb/>All-important principle<lb/>in civil justice<lb/>according to J. B. is the<lb/>non-disappointment<lb/>principle -- See Review<lb/>of Humphreys.</note><lb/>According to Mr. Bentham the one all-comprehensive<lb/>rule of civil justice applicable to the purpose<lb/>of giving import &amp; express<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> to all arrangem<hi rend="superscript">ts.</hi><lb/>hav<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> for their subject matters the subj<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> matt<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi> of proprietary<lb/>rights in all their <add>several</add> shapes or still more<lb/>generally all objects of general desire &amp; seats of<lb/>value is that wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> he has termed the non-disappointm<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>or say disapp<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi>-prevent<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi>, a princ<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> some<lb/>further explanat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> herein <add>below</add> above, as also in the art.<lb/>on Mr. Humphreys' work on Real Prop<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> intro<lb/>of this Rev<hi rend="superscript">w.</hi> not that without some modificat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>received from two other sources this subordinate prin<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> can<lb/>consistently with the dictates of its superordinate the great<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi><lb/>happ<hi rend="superscript">ss.</hi> principle be employed to determine the express<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/> given to all the arrangem<hi rend="superscript">ts.</hi> belong<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> to this branch of<lb/>the all-comprehensive rule of act<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi>: but to make any<lb/>further advance into this field w<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be to <gap/><lb/>too widely from the track properly belong<hi rend="superscript">g.</hi> to this art<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> so</p>





Revision as of 19:31, 13 June 2017

Click Here To Edit

1829. June 7. I 2 25
Art. in West. Rev. (Utilitarianism.)

50.
In employing 2 assumptions
1. that it is the general
rule of action laid down
by competent authority.
2. that whatever is
meant by rectitude &
propriety this rule is
a proper one: take
any maxim of justice
& apply it so that justice
will be done. It will
be found that a dictate
of justice is greatest
happiness principle
is same as do. of justice.

In & by the employmt. given to the word justice two
assumptns. are implicitly impliedly contained: assn. 1. that by compett. authory. the
general rule of actn. has been laid down: assn. 2. that whatsever
be meant by rectitude & propriety this rule is itself reference had
to the situatn. in whh. it is thus placed — a right & proper one. Now then take
for exemplificatn. & explanatn.'s sake any one of the rules of detail brought to
view in the characr. of rules or maxims of justice: rules by the observance
of whh. justice will be done — rules by the non-observance of
whh. justice will be violated or in other words injustice will
be done. If then so it be that the rule thus exhibited in the
character of a maxim or dictate of justice is the same whh.
on this same occasn. wd. be found to be a dictate or say
precept emanating frm. the greatt. happss. prine., then thus
far are the notions of the author of the rule in a state of
conformity & due subordinatn. with reference to the greatt.
happss. prine.: & the dictate or say precept thus deduced
on the greatt. happss. prine. may be said to be a
dictate of justice in considn. of the determinateness of the form
of words by whh. it stands expressed.

51.
To have a clear idea
of it justice must be
divided into civil &
penal.

Vague, obscure & little satisfactory as the incomplete
explanatn. of the word justice must as yet be
confessed to be this is all that can yet be done towards
rendering the import attached to it clear & determinate.
Before the concept. conveyed by it can be clear &
adequate a divisn. of its import must be brought to view made. A
divisn. whh. has been made by the hand of custom &
of whh. the words civil & penal have been made
the instrumts.

52.
All-important principle
in civil justice
according to J. B. is the
non-disappointment
principle -- See Review
of Humphreys.

According to Mr. Bentham the one all-comprehensive
rule of civil justice applicable to the purpose
of giving import & expressn. to all arrangemts.
havg. for their subject matters the subjt. matts. of proprietary
rights in all their several shapes or still more
generally all objects of general desire & seats of
value is that whh. he has termed the non-disappointmt.
or say disappt.-preventg. prince., a prince. of whh. some
further explanatn. herein below above, as also in the art.
on Mr. Humphreys' work on Real Propy. intro
of this Revw. not that without some modificatn.
received from two other sources this subordinate prine. can
consistently with the dictates of its superordinate the greatt.
happss. principle be employed to determine the expressn.
given to all the arrangemts. belongg. to this branch of
the all-comprehensive rule of actn.: but to make any
further advance into this field wd. be to
too widely from the track properly belongg. to this arte. so




Identifier: | JB/014/382/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

50-52

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

382

Info in main headings field

art. in west. rev. (utilitarianism)

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

john flowerdew colls

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5145

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in