★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>10 Sept. 1814</p> | |||
<head>Logic or Ethics</head> | |||
<note>Ch Object</note> | |||
<p>8 <note>Virtue what</note></p> | |||
<p>Unfortunately the further he proceeds <add>travels</add>, the thicker is the<lb/> | |||
dust <del>which with</del> in which by his footsteps the subject has<lb/> | |||
been involved. Given for exhaustion, his division of appetite<lb/> | |||
into <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline"><sic>concupiscible</sic></hi> and <hi rend="underline">irascible</hi> — or the phrase is <del>it</del><lb/> | |||
<del>should <gap/></del> (<hi rend="underline"><sic>concupiscition</sic></hi> and <hi rend="underline"><sic>iration</sic></hi> it should rather<lb/> | |||
have been) is no such thing: and at this stage the <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
imperfection of it stares a man <add>reader</add> in the face. <del><gap/></del> Sub<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> jection one's self to pain — to bodily pain for<lb/> | |||
example is not that what he means in among those things<lb/> | |||
which he means by toleration, by tolerance? Yes:<lb/> | |||
if he himself is to be believed, <hi rend="underline">that</hi> it is. "<foreign>Semivirtutes</foreign><lb/> | |||
<!-- Remainder of this sentence in Latin not transcribed. --> | |||
"<foreign>circa Dolores, ut Tolerantia</foreign>. <add>+</add></p> | |||
<note><add>+</add> p. 70</note> | |||
<p><foreign>Tolerantia</foreign> (thereupon continues he a little further on)<lb/> | |||
"ut virtus <!-- Remainder of this paragraph, and the next, in Latin not transcribed. --></p> | |||
<p>The <del><gap/></del> irascible appetite is that appetite <del>of</del><lb/> | |||
which in consequence of anger or ill will in any other<lb/> | |||
shape <del>which</del> takes for its object <del>pains</del> the suffering of<lb/> | |||
some person who in another sense is the object of it:<lb/> | |||
insomuch that <del>by</del> if not in so far as in the <del><gap/></del> breast<lb/> | |||
of that person pain <add>evil</add> at large is produced, at any rate in<lb/> | |||
so far as to the production of it in that same breast<lb/> | |||
the person in question — the angry person is instrumental,<lb/> | |||
the appetite receives its gratification</p> | |||
<p>But in the case here in question, <add>the breast which is</add> the seat of the pain in question<lb/> | |||
<del>is</del> not the breast of <del>the</del> any person with whom he <add>the man of tolerance is</add> is angry, but his own <note>breast: and <add>in short</add> as for anger<lb/> | |||
it forms not any part of the<lb/> | |||
case.</note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
10 Sept. 1814
Logic or Ethics Ch Object
8 Virtue what
Unfortunately the further he proceeds travels, the thicker is the
dust which with in which by his footsteps the subject has
been involved. Given for exhaustion, his division of appetite
into concupiscible and irascible — or the phrase is it
should (concupiscition and iration it should rather
have been) is no such thing: and at this stage the
imperfection of it stares a man reader in the face. Sub
jection one's self to pain — to bodily pain for
example is not that what he means in among those things
which he means by toleration, by tolerance? Yes:
if he himself is to be believed, that it is. "Semivirtutes
"circa Dolores, ut Tolerantia. +
+ p. 70
Tolerantia (thereupon continues he a little further on)
"ut virtus
The irascible appetite is that appetite of
which in consequence of anger or ill will in any other
shape which takes for its object pains the suffering of
some person who in another sense is the object of it:
insomuch that by if not in so far as in the breast
of that person pain evil at large is produced, at any rate in
so far as to the production of it in that same breast
the person in question — the angry person is instrumental,
the appetite receives its gratification
But in the case here in question, the breast which is the seat of the pain in question
is not the breast of the any person with whom he the man of tolerance is is angry, but his own breast: and in short as for anger
it forms not any part of the
case.
|
Identifier: | JB/014/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1814-09-10 |
|||
|
014 |
deontology |
||
|
091 |
logic or ethics |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] mj&l 1811]] |
||
|
colonel aaron burr |
|||
|
1811 |
|||
|
4854 |
|||
