JB/042/010/001

Click Here To Edit

1823. Oct.r 251824 March 30 Amendment Copied proposed

Constitutional Code. 1.Enactive Part Used
Ch.IX Ministers collectivelyseverally
S..2 Legislation Ministers
13
Art. 13 Example of
imperfection in the tenor
of the law indicable by
any person, finishing or
not, exercising the melioration
suggestive function
1. defining as to slowness:
stating whether
by ambiguity is obscurity

Art 13 Of The the heads of imperfection, to which anythe suggestions
furnishedsubmitted by any person, functionary or un functionary,
in the exercise of the melioration-suggesting function as applied
to the body of laws, the examples as the following

1. Clearness

1. Clause, the impact of which is supposed not sufficiently clear stating: whether
rendered so by ambiguity or by obscurity reference to the clause by chapter Section and Article to the
with this a description of the obscurity or ambiguity imputed
and the words of a correspondent clause by which the substitution of it is supposed
that the imperfection would be rendered

ii Compleatness

II Can, supposed not provided for becauseas supposed not contemplated; with
references as above, to the

ii Conclusiveness to the used 2. Cases, not for requiring
provision, but not provided
for, as supposed, through
ought

III.Arrangement supposed not to be so imformable to the greatest precept
happiness principle. of utility, as the one the <add>tenor</add> of which are is accordingly be proposed to be substituted:
with reference as above, and reasons. 3. Arrangements, supposed
not,so conformable to greatest
happiness principle

Art.2. Expected in the case of every such suggestion 14
Art 124 Assistance
expected
1. Reference to seat of
the supposed imperfection: passages
in which it has place:
by member of chapter
Sections and Articles.
2. Amendment proposed
Form of proposal designation
in
of the alteration proposed
to be made: namely
1. by indication of the
entire clause proposed to be
eliminated followed by
extinction of do to be intellectual:

2. by detection as in correction
for the press
are the following assistances following: namely
in passage

1. Reference made to the seat of the <add>supposed</add> imperfection: namely to the passage or passages in which the supposed imperfection
it is supposed to have places: reference, by mention by indication of Chapter
Sections and Articles.

2. Amendment proposed: form of proposal<add>determinate</add> designation in namely, by indication of the
alteration proposed to be made: namely by aproposed elimination, addition or substitution: in the addition
of substitution: the substitution being designated either by and in any can either by amendment activally
made, or by instruction for the with and action
followed by the exhibition of an entire clause proposed to be substituted; of the difference between the passage as amended and
the passage as unamended in or by or by direction instruction for making
the amendments substitution<add>with or of</add>word for word, or phrase to phrase, as in the case of corrections for the press.
by here and there a word directed to be substituted to a
word indicated the words substituted

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/042/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1824-03-30	Marginal Summary Numbering	13-14
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	010	Info in main headings field	constitutional code i enactive part
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1822
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1822
Notes public	"used"	ID Number	12933
Box Contents