JB/014/112/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/112/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>13 Sept 1814</p>
<head>Logic or Ethics</head>
<note>Ch. Aristotelian Virtue</note>
<p>2</p>
 
<p>Of these four definitions &#x2014; the first <del><gap/></del> make<lb/>
sense of it, who can: if it meant any thing it would<lb/>
be that there are exactly two virtues, viz. mediocrity<lb/>
and prudence, and these two are one</p>
 
<p>The three others, <add>not to speak of <unclear>milk</unclear> and <unclear>reason</unclear></add> reconcile them to one another who<lb/>
can.</p>
 
<p>1. The divine will &#x2014; good <add>yes</add>. But to <add><del>no<gap/></del></add> know on each<lb/>
occasion to be assured what the divine will is &#x2014; there lies<lb/>
the difficulty. <del>Fo</del> Is it to the two Testaments old and<lb/>
new, or either of them? that we are to look for it. Unhappily<lb/>
the Old has in some points (but what points?)<lb/>
been superseded by the New &#x2014; and both of them to a<lb/>
degree pregnant with continual doubts, difficulties<lb/>
and disputes deal in generals.</p>
 
<p>2. It consists in conformity to the divine will and<lb/>
to right reason. But Reason <del><gap/> <gap/></del> according<lb/>
to those who occupy themselves with <unclear>most</unclear> zeal and<lb/>
assiduity in the discovery of the divine will, Reason<lb/>
and the divine will or at least the inferences deduced<lb/>
from it, are everlastingly at variance.</p>
 
<p>But, besides consisting in conformity to the divine<lb/>
will and to right reason, it consists in mediocrity.<lb/>
<del>R</del> Unhappily of <add>by</add> this new <add>third</add> standard by reference to<lb/>
this third standard, it appears not <add>seems not easy to say how it is</add> that the abovementioned<lb/>
doubts and difficulties should be removed or so<lb/>
much as lessened.</p>
 





Revision as of 09:02, 6 July 2017

Click Here To Edit

13 Sept 1814

Logic or Ethics Ch. Aristotelian Virtue

2

Of these four definitions — the first make
sense of it, who can: if it meant any thing it would
be that there are exactly two virtues, viz. mediocrity
and prudence, and these two are one

The three others, not to speak of milk and reason reconcile them to one another who
can.

1. The divine will — good yes. But to no know on each
occasion to be assured what the divine will is — there lies
the difficulty. Fo Is it to the two Testaments old and
new, or either of them? that we are to look for it. Unhappily
the Old has in some points (but what points?)
been superseded by the New — and both of them to a
degree pregnant with continual doubts, difficulties
and disputes deal in generals.

2. It consists in conformity to the divine will and
to right reason. But Reason according
to those who occupy themselves with most zeal and
assiduity in the discovery of the divine will, Reason
and the divine will or at least the inferences deduced
from it, are everlastingly at variance.

But, besides consisting in conformity to the divine
will and to right reason, it consists in mediocrity.
R Unhappily of by this new third standard by reference to
this third standard, it appears not seems not easy to say how it is that the abovementioned
doubts and difficulties should be removed or so
much as lessened.




Identifier: | JB/014/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1814-09-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

logic or ethics

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4875

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in