★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <p>16 Sept. 1814</p> | ||
<p>Logic or Ethics</p> | |||
<note>Ch. Causes of Immorality</note> | |||
<p>3</p> | |||
<note>§.3. Religion misapplied</note> | |||
<p>To take, on this occasion, a distinction between the attributes<lb/> | |||
of God, and the attributes ot man, <add>and in particular</add> to say that<lb/> | |||
God's benevolence, though different from mans <add>God's</add> benevolence,<lb/> | |||
is not the less benevolence is mere mockery. Except <add>Unless</add> in<lb/> | |||
its application <add>to humankind on the one hand &</add> to human conduct, <del><gap/></del> the other to human<lb/> | |||
feelings, whence did the word <hi rend="underline">benevolence</hi> acquire its<lb/> | |||
meaning? <del>The</del> Be it what it may an effect is still<lb/> | |||
the same — it is still itself whatsoever be its author or its<lb/> | |||
cause. <del>If to affect <gap/> little better he who is at the<lb/> | |||
pains of asserting this is trifling</del> If he who asserts this is a<lb/> | |||
trifler what shall <unclear>is</unclear> say of him who <unclear>deems</unclear> it?</p> | |||
<p>To <del><gap/></del> ascribe to God under the name of benevolence<lb/> | |||
<add>to ascribe to God's own being</add> that which if ascribed to man <add>another being</add> would not be benevolence is<lb/> | |||
<del>if</del> on the part of every one, who is not blind <add>whom terror or prejudice has not blinded</add> to the absurdity <add>impropriety</add><lb/> | |||
<unclear>so more cut if fenced</unclear>: <del><gap/> <gap/></del> under the name of<lb/> | |||
a <hi rend="underline">fish</hi> it is to sell a <hi rend="underline">serpent</hi>. By being called a <del>fish</del> <note>tomtit</note><lb/> | |||
would an <del>adder</del> <add><unclear>avantule</unclear></add> be made harmless?</p> | |||
<p><del>Any other</del> True of any one attribute this can not be<lb/> | |||
otherwise than true of any other. Any otherwise than as<lb/> | |||
man <del>can</del> be <add>is</add> just, how can any other being be just? and so<lb/> | |||
of <unclear>powerfulness</unclear> and <add>knowledge and</add> veracity. From what but from the<lb/> | |||
observation of the effect of human conduct on human feelings<lb/> | |||
can the idea of justice or the idea, for the designation of which<lb/> | |||
the word <hi rend="underline">justice</hi>, and then others which in different languages<lb/> | |||
correspond <del><gap/></del> to it, have been employed among men — <add>made use of — employed among human beings —</add> have<lb/> | |||
been derived?</p> | |||
16 Sept. 1814
Logic or Ethics
Ch. Causes of Immorality
3
§.3. Religion misapplied
To take, on this occasion, a distinction between the attributes
of God, and the attributes ot man, and in particular to say that
God's benevolence, though different from mans God's benevolence,
is not the less benevolence is mere mockery. Except Unless in
its application to humankind on the one hand & to human conduct, the other to human
feelings, whence did the word benevolence acquire its
meaning? The Be it what it may an effect is still
the same — it is still itself whatsoever be its author or its
cause. If to affect little better he who is at the
pains of asserting this is trifling If he who asserts this is a
trifler what shall is say of him who deems it?
To ascribe to God under the name of benevolence
to ascribe to God's own being that which if ascribed to man another being would not be benevolence is
if on the part of every one, who is not blind whom terror or prejudice has not blinded to the absurdity impropriety
so more cut if fenced: under the name of
a fish it is to sell a serpent. By being called a fish tomtit
would an adder avantule be made harmless?
Any other True of any one attribute this can not be
otherwise than true of any other. Any otherwise than as
man can be is just, how can any other being be just? and so
of powerfulness and knowledge and veracity. From what but from the
observation of the effect of human conduct on human feelings
can the idea of justice or the idea, for the designation of which
the word justice, and then others which in different languages
correspond to it, have been employed among men — made use of — employed among human beings — have
been derived?
Identifier: | JB/014/128/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1814-09-16 |
|||
014 |
deontology |
||
128 |
logic or ethics |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] mj&l 1811]] |
||
colonel aaron burr |
|||
1811 |
|||
4891 |
|||