JB/014/182/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/182/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>5 Sept. 1814</p>
<head>Deontology</head>
<note>Ch. Principle</note>
<p>2</p>
 
<p>Answer &#x2014; In so far as a man is said to act habitually<lb/>
upon principle &#x2014; to be a man of principle, he is considered<lb/>
as pursuing the course <unclear>pointed</unclear> out by the corresponding<lb/>
rule or system of action notwithstanding all solicitations<lb/>
to the contrary. But these solicitations these temptations<lb/>
to the contrary &#x2014; what are they? They are the solicitations<lb/>
practised the temptations administered by the prospect<lb/>
of <add>eventually</add> approaching pain or eventually approaching pleasure<lb/>
These <add>Such</add> solicitations a man can not have resisted <add>in proportion as a man has proved</add> <add><sic>shewn</sic></add> <add>himself</add>, <unclear>but</unclear><lb/>
able to resist <add>withstand</add>, he has proved himself able to forego<lb/>
pleasure or exemption, though no point <add>respect</add> of proximity<lb/>
and <unclear>extremity</unclear> <add>the</add> <unclear>more</unclear> considerable for the avoidance<lb/>
of <unclear>these</unclear> than equivalent though less nearly situated<lb/>
and perhaps <add>commonly <unclear>were</unclear> it only on that account</add> less certain pain or loss of pleasure.</p>
 
<p>This system &#x2014; the object of that adherence <add><unclear>for</unclear></add> the<lb/>
<del>its</del> <gap/>nantry of which the agent is said to act upon principle,<lb/>
to <sic>shew</sic> himself a man of principle, if it be not<lb/>
in all points conformable to the principle of utility &#x2014; <del>it</del><lb/>
what <del><gap/></del> scarce ever does or can happen is, that<lb/>
it shall not include in it some rules <add>of the rules</add> which are<lb/>
framed under and operate in conformity to that all<lb/>
benefiting principle, and it is only in so far as in<lb/>
the system to which adherence to which is thus maintained<lb/>
upon principle by the adherence to which the prevalence<lb/>
of principle is demonstrated, that <del>the</del> may approbation<lb/>
is bestowed upon the character in question <add>becomes</add> <add>is regarded</add> <add>an object or subject of approbation</add>, as above.</p>





Revision as of 09:51, 18 August 2017

Click Here To Edit

5 Sept. 1814

Deontology Ch. Principle

2

Answer — In so far as a man is said to act habitually
upon principle — to be a man of principle, he is considered
as pursuing the course pointed out by the corresponding
rule or system of action notwithstanding all solicitations
to the contrary. But these solicitations these temptations
to the contrary — what are they? They are the solicitations
practised the temptations administered by the prospect
of eventually approaching pain or eventually approaching pleasure
These Such solicitations a man can not have resisted in proportion as a man has proved shewn himself, but
able to resist withstand, he has proved himself able to forego
pleasure or exemption, though no point respect of proximity
and extremity the more considerable for the avoidance
of these than equivalent though less nearly situated
and perhaps commonly were it only on that account less certain pain or loss of pleasure.

This system — the object of that adherence for the
its nantry of which the agent is said to act upon principle,
to shew himself a man of principle, if it be not
in all points conformable to the principle of utility — it
what scarce ever does or can happen is, that
it shall not include in it some rules of the rules which are
framed under and operate in conformity to that all
benefiting principle, and it is only in so far as in
the system to which adherence to which is thus maintained
upon principle by the adherence to which the prevalence
of principle is demonstrated, that the may approbation
is bestowed upon the character in question becomes is regarded an object or subject of approbation, as above.




Identifier: | JB/014/182/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1815-09-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

182

Info in main headings field

deontology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

4945

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in