JB/014/242/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/242/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1819 Aug. 11.</p>
<head>Deontology Theoretical</head>
<note>Theoretical</note>
<p>1</p>
<note>Pride and Vanity</note>
 
<p><del>Pride and vanity &#x2014; neither exclusively virtues nor d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> vices &#x2014;<lb/>
more apt to be considered as <hi rend="underline">vices</hi> especially when their conjugates<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">proud</hi> and <hi rend="underline">vain</hi> are employed.</del></p>
 
<p>Ordo<lb/>
24 Dec. 1814 Quere notwithstanding the intimacy of the relation quere whether<lb/>
for simplicity of conception, in rewriting it might not be better to <del><gap/></del> consider<lb/>
one of them at a time: explaining that first, and then the other with reference to it.</p>
 
<head>Ch. Of Pride and Vanity.</head>
 
<p>Pride and Vanity, if they be both of them explained,<lb/>
must, to be clearly explained, be explained together.<lb/>
For the explanation of them, the same medium<lb/>
of explanation will be seen to be necessary. This is the<lb/>
popular or moral sanction: including the pleasures<lb/>
and the pains, and, consequently, the interests, desires,<lb/>
and motives, which belong to it: the desires; and, consequently,<lb/>
esteem &#x2014; the ideal possession, which is the<lb/>
object of those desires.</p>
 
<p>Esteem &#x2014; the esteem of that portion of the human<lb/>
race upon which his well-being is regarded by<lb/>
him <add>them</add> as in any way depending is, to the proud man,<lb/>
and the vain man, the common object of their thoughts.</p>
 
<p>With regard to each of them, two questions are continually<lb/>
presenting themselves: two questions &#x2014; having,both of them<lb/>
an indisputable <add>a manifest</add> influence on practice. <add>Pride &#x2014; 1</add> Is it of the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
nature of virtue, or of the nature of vice?: if of the nature<lb/>
of virtue, of what virtue?: if of the nature of vice, of what<lb/>
vice. And so in regard to Vanity.</p>





Revision as of 09:07, 20 September 2017

Click Here To Edit

1819 Aug. 11.

Deontology Theoretical Theoretical

1

Pride and Vanity

Pride and vanity — neither exclusively virtues nor do vices —
more apt to be considered as vices especially when their conjugates
proud and vain are employed.

Ordo
24 Dec. 1814 Quere notwithstanding the intimacy of the relation quere whether
for simplicity of conception, in rewriting it might not be better to consider
one of them at a time: explaining that first, and then the other with reference to it.

Ch. Of Pride and Vanity.

Pride and Vanity, if they be both of them explained,
must, to be clearly explained, be explained together.
For the explanation of them, the same medium
of explanation will be seen to be necessary. This is the
popular or moral sanction: including the pleasures
and the pains, and, consequently, the interests, desires,
and motives, which belong to it: the desires; and, consequently,
esteem — the ideal possession, which is the
object of those desires.

Esteem — the esteem of that portion of the human
race upon which his well-being is regarded by
him them as in any way depending is, to the proud man,
and the vain man, the common object of their thoughts.

With regard to each of them, two questions are continually
presenting themselves: two questions — having,both of them
an indisputable a manifest influence on practice. Pride — 1 Is it of the
nature of virtue, or of the nature of vice?: if of the nature
of virtue, of what virtue?: if of the nature of vice, of what
vice. And so in regard to Vanity.




Identifier: | JB/014/242/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1819-08-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

242

Info in main headings field

deontology theoretical

Image

001

Titles

[[titles::ordo / ch. [ ] of pride and vanity]]

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e1

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5005

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in