JB/079/086/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/086/002: Difference between revisions

Zctyp18 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Zctyp18 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
of <unclear>work</unclear>] that perhaps it may be mended.  Nor is it a<lb/>
of <unclear>work</unclear>] that perhaps it may be mended.  Nor is it a<lb/>
good reason to give why Legislators should not speak<lb/>
good reason to give why Legislators should not speak<lb/>
their own meaning, that <add>judges</add> <del><gap/></del> may speak.<lb/>
their own meaning, that <add>judges</add> perhaps <del>judges</del> may speak.<lb/>
it for them.  This is the answer to be given to these <add>[+]</add> <note>[+] who are for retaining impropriety improper <del>and</del> language because it is of long standing, and</note><lb/>
it for them.  This is the answer to be given to those <add>[+]</add> <note>[+] who are for retaining impropriety improper <del>and</del> language because it is of long standing, and</note><lb/>
who think <del><gap/> that</del> a Legislator <del>can</del> <add>may</add> be too <lb/>
who think <del><gap/> that</del> a Legislator <del>can</del> <add>may</add> be too <lb/>
accurate in the choice of his explanations.</p>
accurate in the choice of his explanations.</p>

Revision as of 22:34, 9 April 2011

Click Here To Edit

18
Observations.

that when once the adequate proportion of words is exceedid,
the more than not, the more they are in danger of not using
enough: an observation a proportion seemingly paradoxical, but
the truth of which , becomes apparent when it is
considered, that the grand cause of redundancy in legal
. discourse, is the roaming out into unnecessary
specifications, and that if by a thousand terms
of specific import, less may be said than by the the
general one to which they are stand subordinate.

Again, to the word removing of which is the word in the statute,
I have restituted the word, "quitting business" because it
is a probable case that a person may quit the
business without removing out of the house. A Parent
for example, becoming infirm, gives up
the management of the business house to his child,
but continues there as a border. So For right
vers rights like these there is a remedy in the
accustomed license of judicial construction: that it is but
an indifferent reason for making a law [in a piece
of work] that perhaps it may be mended. Nor is it a
good reason to give why Legislators should not speak
their own meaning, that judges perhaps judges may speak.
it for them. This is the answer to be given to those [+] [+] who are for retaining impropriety improper and language because it is of long standing, and
who think that a Legislator can may be too
accurate in the choice of his explanations.

[+]


Identifier: | JB/079/086/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

086

Info in main headings field

observations

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e17 / e18 / e19 / e20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25528

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in