★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/072/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>C <lb/> | ||
Offences against one's Self. Paedersty<lb/></head> | |||
<p>in favour of it <add>upon the subject</add> without taking notice of that circumstance.<lb/></p> | |||
A notion more obvious, but perhaps not much <lb/> <note>Whether it hurts population?</note> | |||
better founded than the former is that of it's being <lb/> | |||
prejudicial to population. <add>[+]</add>, <unclear>for</unclear> Voltaire appears <lb/> | |||
disinclined in one part of his works to give <unclear>some</unclear><lb/> | |||
countenance to this opinion. He speaks of it as a <lb/> | |||
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would<lb/> | |||
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.<lb/> | |||
<foreign>Comment est-il <unclear>ju</unclear> faire qu'un vice destructeur <lb/> du genre humain, s'il fait general; qu'un <lb/> | |||
<unclear>allental</unclear> infame contre la nation, <gap/> pourlait si <lb/> | |||
naturel?<add>+</add></foreign>. <del><gap/></del> A little further on speaking of <lb/> | |||
<gap/> Empiricus who would have us believe that the <lb/> | |||
<sic>practise</sic> was "recommended" <del><gap/></del> in Persia by the laws, <lb/> | |||
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to <lb/> | |||
annihilate that human race if it were literally <lb/> | |||
observed. "Non, <add>(says he)</add> il n'est pas dans la nature humaine <lb/> | |||
"Je faire non loi qui contredit, il quit outrage la <lb/> | |||
"nature, une lui qui <unclear>ancontirait</unclear> le genre-humain <lb/> | |||
"si elle etait observie a la lettre." This consequence <lb/> | |||
however is far enough from being a necessary one. <lb/> | |||
For a law of the purport he represents to be should, <lb/> | |||
is sufficient that this unprolific | |||
C
Offences against one's Self. Paedersty
in favour of it upon the subject without taking notice of that circumstance.
A notion more obvious, but perhaps not much
Whether it hurts population?
better founded than the former is that of it's being
prejudicial to population. [+], for Voltaire appears
disinclined in one part of his works to give some
countenance to this opinion. He speaks of it as a
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.
Comment est-il ju faire qu'un vice destructeur
du genre humain, s'il fait general; qu'un
allental infame contre la nation, pourlait si
naturel?+. A little further on speaking of
Empiricus who would have us believe that the
practise was "recommended" in Persia by the laws,
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to
annihilate that human race if it were literally
observed. "Non, (says he) il n'est pas dans la nature humaine
"Je faire non loi qui contredit, il quit outrage la
"nature, une lui qui ancontirait le genre-humain
"si elle etait observie a la lettre." This consequence
however is far enough from being a necessary one.
For a law of the purport he represents to be should,
is sufficient that this unprolific
|
Identifier: | JB/072/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
072 |
penal code |
||
|
194 |
offences against one's self - paederasty |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f13 / f14 / / f16 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
23811 |
|||
