JB/014/415/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/415/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Jgregor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>4</note>


But in both Horace &amp; Phædrus the mention of Utility<lb/>
as a motive to conduct appears rather accidental than otherwise<lb/>
Neither of them <del>app</del> seems to have understood the value &amp; importance<lb/>
of the <del>principle</del> <add>doctrine</add> <del>they</del> <add>he</add>
put forward &#x2014; In neither case does it occupy<lb/>
the position of a great &amp; important principle &#x2014; It was<lb/>
adopted by no sect &#x2014; it was <add>avowed</add> followed &#x2014; worshipped by no votaries<lb/>
It was wholly in an embryo state &#x2014; It had no influential &#x2014;<lb/>
no presiding power &#x2014; it had not obtained a place in the<del><gap/></del><lb/>
Elysian fields among these aphorisms, written in letters of light<lb/>
which Æneas found Anchises passing under review. Unvalued<lb/>
&amp; unheeded it remained &#x2014; like the <del>Aristotelian <gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del> truth which dropped by chance from the heedless pen of Aristotle</add> that<lb/>
all ideas have their origin in the senses &#x2014; two magnificent<lb/>
principles where consequences were hidden from the perception<lb/>
of many, &#x2014; many generations. Locke




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:32, 26 October 2017

Click Here To Edit

4

But in both Horace & Phædrus the mention of Utility
as a motive to conduct appears rather accidental than otherwise
Neither of them app seems to have understood the value & importance
of the principle doctrine they he put forward — In neither case does it occupy
the position of a great & important principle — It was
adopted by no sect — it was avowed followed — worshipped by no votaries
It was wholly in an embryo state — It had no influential —
no presiding power — it had not obtained a place in the
Elysian fields among these aphorisms, written in letters of light
which Æneas found Anchises passing under review. Unvalued
& unheeded it remained — like the Aristotelian truth which dropped by chance from the heedless pen of Aristotle that
all ideas have their origin in the senses — two magnificent
principles where consequences were hidden from the perception
of many, — many generations. Locke



Identifier: | JB/014/415/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

415

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f4

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial fleur de lys motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5178

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in