JB/550/230/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/550/230/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<del>43</del><p>in this case, as in others, at the doors of those who make them. Knives,<lb/>however sharp, are very <sic>usefull</sic> things; and, for most purposes, the sharper, the more<lb/><sic>usefull</sic>. I have no fear therefore of your writing to forbid the use of them, because<lb/>they have been sometimes employed by School boys to raise the Devil with,<lb/>or by assassins to cut throats with.</p><p>I hope no critic of more learning than candour will do an<lb/>Inspection-house so much injustice as to compare it to <hi rend="underline">Dionysius's ear.</hi> The<lb/>object of that contrivance was, to know what prisoners said without their<lb/>suspecting any such thing. The object of the Inspection-principle is directly the<lb/>reverse: it is to make them not only suspect, but to be assured, that whatever<lb/>they do is known, even though that should not be the case. Detection is the<lb/>object of the first: prevention that of the latter. In the former case the ruling<lb/>person is a spy: <add>in</add> <del>In</del> the latter he is a <del>minister</del> <add>monitor.</add> The object of the first was to<lb/>pry into the secret recesses of the heart. The latter, confining its attention<lb/>to <hi rend="underline"><del>covert</del></hi> <hi rend="underline"><add>overt</add></hi> <hi rend="underline">acts</hi>, <del>leaving</del> <add>leaves</add> thoughts and fancies to their proper <hi rend="underline">Ordinary</hi>, the<lb/>Court above.</p>
<del>43</del><p>in this case, as in others, at the doors of those who make them. Knives,<lb/>however sharp, are very <sic>usefull</sic> things; and, for most purposes, the sharper, the more<lb/><sic>usefull</sic>. I have no fear therefore of your writing to forbid the use of them, because<lb/>they have been sometimes employed by School boys to raise the Devil with,<lb/>or by assassins to cut throats with.</p><p>I hope no critic of more learning than candour will do an<lb/>Inspection-house so much injustice as to compare it to <hi rend="underline">Dionysius's ear.</hi> The<lb/>object of that contrivance was, to know what prisoners said without their<lb/>suspecting any such thing. The object of the Inspection-principle is directly the<lb/>reverse: it is to make them not only suspect, but to be assured, that whatever<lb/>they do is known, even though that should not be the case. Detection is the<lb/>object of the first: prevention that of the latter. In the former case the ruling<lb/>person is a spy: <add>in</add> <del>In</del> the latter he is a <del>minister</del> <add>monitor.</add> The object of the first was to<lb/>pry into the secret recesses of the heart. The latter, confining its attention<lb/>to <hi rend="underline"><del>covert</del></hi> <hi rend="underline"><add>overt</add></hi> <hi rend="underline">acts</hi>, <del>leaving</del> <add>leaves</add> thoughts and fancies to their proper <hi rend="underline">Ordinary</hi>, the<lb/>Court above.</p>-----<p>When I consider the extensive variety of purposes to which this<lb/>principle may be <sic>applyed</sic>, and the certain efficacy which, as far as I can <del><gap/></del><lb/>trust my own conceptions, it promises to them all, my wonder is, not only<lb/>that this plan should never have hitherto been put in practice, but how any<lb/>other should ever have been thought of. Does it sound natural, that in so<lb/>many edifices, as, from the time of the conquest to the present, have been<lb/>built for the express purpose of safe-custody, instead of placing the<lb/>prisoners under the inspection of the Keepers, the one class should have been<lb/>lodged at one end, perhaps, of a vast building, and the other at another<lb/>end? &#x2014; as if the object of the establishment were, that those who wished to escape<lb/>might be carried on their schemes, in concert and at leisure. I should suppose<lb/>the Inspection principle must long ago have occurred to the ingenious,<lb/>and been rejected by the judicious, could I, after all my efforts, conceive a reason<lb/>for the rejection. The circular form, notwithstanding is taking demonstrably<lb/>less materials than any other, may, for aught I know, on its first construction<lb/>be more expensive than one of equal <add>dimensions,</add> in any of the ordinary forms.<lb/>But this objection, which has no other force than the loose and random<lb/>surmise of one who has had no experience in building, can never have held<lb/>good in comparison to all the other prisons that we have, if in truth it<lb/>holds <add>good in comparison <del><gap/></del></add> to any. Witness the massy piles of Newgate, of which the enormous,<lb/>and upon the <del>present</del> <add>common</add> plans by no means unnecessary, expence, has been<lb/>laid out in the purchase of a degree of security, not equal to that which<lb/>the circular form would have given to the slightest building, that could<lb/>be made to hold together. In short as often as I indulge myself the liberty<lb/>of fancying that my own notions on this head may prove conformable to other people's<lb/><del>of considering the plan as carried into <gap/> <gap/></del>. I think of the old story<lb/>of Columbus and his egg.</p>





Revision as of 18:57, 2 November 2017

Click Here To Edit

43

in this case, as in others, at the doors of those who make them. Knives,
however sharp, are very usefull things; and, for most purposes, the sharper, the more
usefull. I have no fear therefore of your writing to forbid the use of them, because
they have been sometimes employed by School boys to raise the Devil with,
or by assassins to cut throats with.

I hope no critic of more learning than candour will do an
Inspection-house so much injustice as to compare it to Dionysius's ear. The
object of that contrivance was, to know what prisoners said without their
suspecting any such thing. The object of the Inspection-principle is directly the
reverse: it is to make them not only suspect, but to be assured, that whatever
they do is known, even though that should not be the case. Detection is the
object of the first: prevention that of the latter. In the former case the ruling
person is a spy: in In the latter he is a minister monitor. The object of the first was to
pry into the secret recesses of the heart. The latter, confining its attention
to covert overt acts, leaving leaves thoughts and fancies to their proper Ordinary, the
Court above.

-----

When I consider the extensive variety of purposes to which this
principle may be applyed, and the certain efficacy which, as far as I can
trust my own conceptions, it promises to them all, my wonder is, not only
that this plan should never have hitherto been put in practice, but how any
other should ever have been thought of. Does it sound natural, that in so
many edifices, as, from the time of the conquest to the present, have been
built for the express purpose of safe-custody, instead of placing the
prisoners under the inspection of the Keepers, the one class should have been
lodged at one end, perhaps, of a vast building, and the other at another
end? — as if the object of the establishment were, that those who wished to escape
might be carried on their schemes, in concert and at leisure. I should suppose
the Inspection principle must long ago have occurred to the ingenious,
and been rejected by the judicious, could I, after all my efforts, conceive a reason
for the rejection. The circular form, notwithstanding is taking demonstrably
less materials than any other, may, for aught I know, on its first construction
be more expensive than one of equal dimensions, in any of the ordinary forms.
But this objection, which has no other force than the loose and random
surmise of one who has had no experience in building, can never have held
good in comparison to all the other prisons that we have, if in truth it
holds good in comparison to any. Witness the massy piles of Newgate, of which the enormous,
and upon the present common plans by no means unnecessary, expence, has been
laid out in the purchase of a degree of security, not equal to that which
the circular form would have given to the slightest building, that could
be made to hold together. In short as often as I indulge myself the liberty
of fancying that my own notions on this head may prove conformable to other people's
of considering the plan as carried into . I think of the old story
of Columbus and his egg.




Identifier: | JB/550/230/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 550.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

550

Main Headings

Folio number

230

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in