JB/135/068/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/068/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
to another.</p>
to another.</p>


In this case as well as in former conceiving<lb/>
<p>In this case as well as in former conceiving<lb/>
the addition of things, I had considered <hi rend="underline">things</hi><lb/>
the addition of things, I had considered <hi rend="underline">things</hi><lb/>
as expressive of substances having different properties<lb/>
as expressive of substances having different properties<lb/>
Line 20: Line 20:
called them equal in general terms<lb/>
called them equal in general terms<lb/>
without specifying the property in which<lb/>
without specifying the property in which<lb/>
 
they were equal <del>that</del><add>is</add> being supposed<lb/>
to be know what property are thus attended to<lb/>
But <add>the <gap/></add> <hi rend="underline">Things</hi> in the <del>geomet</del> are and in the<lb/>
Geometrical sense only to represent at<lb/>
are time same <del>are</del> property making it<lb/>
a fictitious entity. Quantity appears<lb/>
to be the only fictitious entity treated of<lb/>
by geometry if under the head of quantity<lb/>
we include every thing which can <add>acting by</add> by imagined<lb/>
divided into aliquots.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:25, 22 November 2017

Click Here To Edit

of the and addition was
so is that of Equality.
mebody could not be put in any disble
ircumstances so as to be and to be added
to another for all purposes, so no body
can be put in such circumstances as to be
besaid to be for all purposes equal
to another.

In this case as well as in former conceiving
the addition of things, I had considered things
as expressive of substances having different properties
and what appeared was only that when one
consider one property only of such things that
if they were equal in that respect, we
called them equal in general terms
without specifying the property in which
they were equal thatis being supposed
to be know what property are thus attended to
But the Things in the geomet are and in the
Geometrical sense only to represent at
are time same are property making it
a fictitious entity. Quantity appears
to be the only fictitious entity treated of
by geometry if under the head of quantity
we include every thing which can acting by by imagined
divided into aliquots.



Identifier: | JB/135/068/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

Folio number

068

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

sir samuel bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46186

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in