★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/541/471/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/541/471/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><note> 1793-9-23</note></p> <p> of comparatively no account, as is most likely, and<lb/> the commons objections are repelled <del>which</del> after<lb/> the peers have prevailed, will not this be an<lb?> invidious circumstance to say no more? will it<lb/> be becoming <add>decent</add>(to say nothing of justice) to have<lb/> one measure for the high and another for the low?</p> <p> then if there is to be compulsion who is it to be<lb/> <add>trusted to</add> administer it — An <add> A single</add> individual like myself? — This<lb/> would hardly be endured — who else in short, but<lb/> the same sort of tribunal <del>who</del> that ahs already<lb/> been chosen for the purpose? but this very tribunal<lb/> has already pronounced: it has pronounced<lb/> in <del><gap/></del> confirmation of the present<lb/> spot: shall it be called upon to <del>pronounce</del> reverse<lb/> its judgment, and pronounce a new<lb/> one? An why? upon what ground? — because<lb/> the present proprietor is a man of <add>high</add> rank<lb/> and <del>influence</del> <add>character</add>? what if the next choice fell <lb/> upon ground that happens to be the property<lb/> of a rich peer <del>is it</del> are the Judges to be called<lb/> upon for a new judgment, and so <foreign>toties quoties</foreign><lb/> <sic>untill</sic> the lot fall upon some obscure individual<lb/> who is less able than any of them to<lb?> bear it, and who can not get any body to bear him <add> command an audience</add><lb/> <add>when</add> </p> | |||
1793-9-23
of comparatively no account, as is most likely, and
the commons objections are repelled which after
the peers have prevailed, will not this be an<lb?> invidious circumstance to say no more? will it
be becoming decent(to say nothing of justice) to have
one measure for the high and another for the low?
then if there is to be compulsion who is it to be
trusted to administer it — An A single individual like myself? — This
would hardly be endured — who else in short, but
the same sort of tribunal who that ahs already
been chosen for the purpose? but this very tribunal
has already pronounced: it has pronounced
in confirmation of the present
spot: shall it be called upon to pronounce reverse
its judgment, and pronounce a new
one? An why? upon what ground? — because
the present proprietor is a man of high rank
and influence character? what if the next choice fell
upon ground that happens to be the property
of a rich peer is it are the Judges to be called
upon for a new judgment, and so toties quoties
untill the lot fall upon some obscure individual
who is less able than any of them to<lb?> bear it, and who can not get any body to bear him command an audience
when
|
Identifier: | JB/541/471/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1793-09-23 |
|||
|
541 |
|||
|
471 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Correspondence |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
